Articles | Volume 15, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7533-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7533-2022
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Oct 2022
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Oct 2022

Recovery of sparse urban greenhouse gas emissions

Benjamin Zanger, Jia Chen, Man Sun, and Florian Dietrich

Related authors

Transferability of machine-learning-based global calibration models for NO2 and NO low-cost sensors
Ayah Abu-Hani, Jia Chen, Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Adrian Wenzel, and Alessandro Bigi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3917–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024, 2024
Short summary
Using a portable FTIR spectrometer to evaluate the consistency of Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) measurements on a global scale: the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) travel standard
Benedikt Herkommer, Carlos Alberti, Paolo Castracane, Jia Chen, Angelika Dehn, Florian Dietrich, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Matthias Max Frey, Jochen Groß, Lawson Gillespie, Frank Hase, Isamu Morino, Nasrin Mostafavi Pak, Brittany Walker, and Debra Wunch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3467–3494, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Greenhouse gas column observations from a portable spectrometer in Uganda
Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, William Okello, Jia Chen, Florian Dietrich, Mark F. Lunt, Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, and Frank Hase
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-234,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-234, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Understanding greenhouse gas (GHG) column concentrations in Munich using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model
Xinxu Zhao, Jia Chen, Julia Marshall, Michal Gałkowski​​​​​​​, Stephan Hachinger, Florian Dietrich, Ankit Shekhar, Johannes Gensheimer, Adrian Wenzel, and Christoph Gerbig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14325–14347, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Spatiotemporal modeling of air pollutant concentrations in Germany using machine learning
Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Jia Chen, Adrian Wenzel, and Frank N. Keutsch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10267–10285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10267-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10267-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
WRF-Comfort: simulating microscale variability in outdoor heat stress at the city scale with a mesoscale model
Alberto Martilli, Negin Nazarian, E. Scott Krayenhoff, Jacob Lachapelle, Jiachen Lu, Esther Rivas, Alejandro Rodriguez-Sanchez, Beatriz Sanchez, and José Luis Santiago
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5023–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Representing effects of surface heterogeneity in a multi-plume eddy diffusivity mass flux boundary layer parameterization
Nathan P. Arnold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5041–5056, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Can TROPOMI NO2 satellite data be used to track the drop in and resurgence of NOx emissions in Germany between 2019–2021 using the multi-source plume method (MSPM)?
Enrico Dammers, Janot Tokaya, Christian Mielke, Kevin Hausmann, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Henk Eskes, and Renske Timmermans
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4983–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024, 2024
Short summary
A spatiotemporally separated framework for reconstructing the sources of atmospheric radionuclide releases
Yuhan Xu, Sheng Fang, Xinwen Dong, and Shuhan Zhuang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4961–4982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024, 2024
Short summary
A parameterization scheme for the floating wind farm in a coupled atmosphere–wave model (COAWST v3.7)
Shaokun Deng, Shengmu Yang, Shengli Chen, Daoyi Chen, Xuefeng Yang, and Shanshan Cui
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4891–4909, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4891-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Baraniuk, R., Davenport, M., DeVore, R., and Wakin, M.: A simple proof of the restricted isometry property for random matrices, Constructive Approximation, 28, 253–263, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-007-9003-x, 2008. a
Boche, H., Calderbank, R., Kutyniok, G., and Vybíral, J.: A survey of compressed sensing, in: Compressed sensing and its applications, 1–39, Springer, 2015. a
Candès, E. J.: The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 346, 589–592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2008.03.014, 2008. a, b
Candès, E. J. and Tao, T.: Decoding by linear programming, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 51, 4203–4215, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.858979, 2005. a
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., and Tao, T.: Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 59, 1207–1223, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20124, 2006. a
Download
Short summary
Gaussian priors (GPs) used in least squares inversion do not reflect the true distributions of greenhouse gas emissions well. A method that does not rely on GPs is sparse reconstruction (SR). We show that necessary conditions for SR are satisfied for cities and that the application of a wavelet transform can further enhance sparsity. We apply the theory of compressed sensing to SR. Our results show that SR needs fewer measurements and is superior for assessing unknown emitters compared to GPs.