Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-731-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-731-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
27 Jan 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 27 Jan 2022

EuLerian Identification of ascending AirStreams (ELIAS 2.0) in numerical weather prediction and climate models – Part 2: Model application to different datasets

Julian F. Quinting, Christian M. Grams, Annika Oertel, and Moritz Pickl

Related authors

On the role of moist and dry processes for atmospheric blocking biases in the Euro-Atlantic region in CMIP6
Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Olivia Martius, and Julian Quinting
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2878,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2878, 2024
Short summary
A satellite-based analysis of semi-direct effects of biomass burning aerosols on fog and low cloud dissipation in the Namib Desert
Alexandre Mass, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Paola Formenti, Eva Pauli, and Julian Quinting
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1627,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1627, 2024
Short summary
Architectural Insights and Training Methodology Optimization of Pangu-Weather
Deifilia Aurora To, Julian Quinting, Gholam Ali Hoshyaripour, Markus Götz, Achim Streit, and Charlotte Debus
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1714,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1714, 2024
Short summary
Warm conveyor belt activity over the Pacific: modulation by the Madden–Julian Oscillation and impact on tropical–extratropical teleconnections
Julian F. Quinting, Christian M. Grams, Edmund Kar-Man Chang, Stephan Pfahl, and Heini Wernli
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 65–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-65-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-65-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud–radiation interaction during Saharan dust episodes: the dusty cirrus puzzle
Axel Seifert, Vanessa Bachmann, Florian Filipitsch, Jochen Förstner, Christian M. Grams, Gholam Ali Hoshyaripour, Julian Quinting, Anika Rohde, Heike Vogel, Annette Wagner, and Bernhard Vogel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6409–6430, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6409-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6409-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmadi-Givi, F., Graig, G. C., and Plant, R. S.: The Dynamics of a Midlatitude Cyclone with Very Strong Latent-Heat Release, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 295–323, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.226, 2004. a
Bechtold, P., Köhler, M., Jung, T., Doblas-Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M., Rodwell, M. J., Vitart, F., and Balsamo, G.: Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1337–1351, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.289, 2008. a
Binder, H., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., and Wernli, H.: The role of warm conveyor belts for the intensification of extratropical cyclones in Northern Hemisphere winter, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3997–4020, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0302.1, 2016. a, b, c
Bosart, L. F., Moore, B. J., Cordeira, J. M., and Archambault, H. M.: Interactions of north pacific tropical, midlatitude, and polar disturbances resulting in linked extreme weather events over North America in October 2007, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 1245–1273, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0230.1, 2017. a
Browning, K. A.: Conceptual models of precipitation systems., ESA Journal, 9, 157–180, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1986)001<0023:cmops>2.0.co;2, 1985. a
Short summary
This study applies novel artificial-intelligence-based models that allow the identification of one specific weather system which affects the midlatitude circulation. We show that the models yield similar results as their trajectory-based counterpart, which requires data at higher spatiotemporal resolution and is computationally more expensive. Overall, we aim to show how deep learning methods can be used efficiently to support process understanding of biases in weather prediction models.