Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5713-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5713-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
22 Jul 2022
Development and technical paper |
| 22 Jul 2022
| 22 Jul 2022
Use of genetic algorithms for ocean model parameter optimisation: a case study using PISCES-v2_RC for North Atlantic particulate organic carbon
Marcus Falls
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Raffaele Bernardello
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Miguel Castrillo
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Mario Acosta
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Joan Llort
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Department of Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Institut de Ciències del Mar, ICM-CSIC, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Related authors
No articles found.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida B. M. Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Joe Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre A. G. Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik van Ooijen, Guido van der Werf, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-659, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-659, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2025 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2025). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, Jenni Kontkanen, Irina Sandu, Mario Acosta, Mohammed Hussam Al Turjmam, Ivan Alsina-Ferrer, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Leo Arriola, Marvin Axness, Marc Batlle Martín, Peter Bauer, Tobias Becker, Daniel Beltrán, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Sebastien Cabaniols, Silvia Caprioli, Miguel Castrillo, Aparna Chandrasekar, Suvarchal Cheedela, Victor Correal, Emanuele Danovaro, Paolo Davini, Jussi Enkovaara, Claudia Frauen, Barbara Früh, Aina Gaya Àvila, Paolo Ghinassi, Rohit Ghosh, Supriyo Ghosh, Iker González, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Ioan Hadade, Christopher Haine, Carl Hartick, Utz-Uwe Haus, Shane Hearne, Heikki Järvinen, Bernat Jiménez, Amal John, Marlin Juchem, Thomas Jung, Jessica Kegel, Matthias Kelbling, Kai Keller, Bruno Kinoshita, Theresa Kiszler, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Joonas Kolstela, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Aleksander Lacima-Nadolnik, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, Jonni Lehtiranta, Tuomas Lunttila, Anna Luoma, Pekka Manninen, Alexey Medvedev, Sebastian Milinski, Ali Omar Abdelazim Mohammed, Sebastian Müller, Devaraju Naryanappa, Natalia Nazarova, Sami Niemelä, Bimochan Niraula, Henrik Nortamo, Aleksi Nummelin, Matteo Nurisso, Pablo Ortega, Stella Paronuzzi, Xabier Pedruzo Bagazgoitia, Charles Pelletier, Carlos Peña, Suraj Polade, Himansu Pradhan, Rommel Quintanilla, Tiago Quintino, Thomas Rackow, Jouni Räisänen, Maqsood Mubarak Rajput, René Redler, Balthasar Reuter, Nuno Rocha Monteiro, Francesc Roura-Adserias, Silva Ruppert, Susan Sayed, Reiner Schnur, Tanvi Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Outi Sievi-Korte, Albert Soret, Christian Steger, Bjorn Stevens, Jan Streffing, Jaleena Sunny, Luiggi Tenorio, Stephan Thober, Ulf Tigerstedt, Oriol Tinto, Juha Tonttila, Heikki Tuomenvirta, Lauri Tuppi, Ginka Van Thielen, Emanuele Vitali, Jost von Hardenberg, Ingo Wagner, Nils Wedi, Jan Wehner, Sven Willner, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Florian Ziemen, and Janos Zimmermann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Climate Change Adaptation Digital Twin (Climate DT) pioneers the operationalisation of climate projections. The system produces global simulations with local granularity for adaptation decision-making. Applications are embedded to generate tailored indicators. A unified workflow orchestrates all components in several supercomputers. Data management ensures consistency and streaming enables real-time use. It is a complementary innovation to initiatives like CMIP, CORDEX, and climate services.
M. Andrea Orihuela-García, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Vladimir Lapin, Saskia Loosveldt Tomas, Raffaele Bernardello, Margarida Samsó-Cabré, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Miguel Castrillo, and Marti Gali
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.174481514.42345660/v1, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.174481514.42345660/v1, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tiny oceanic algae absorb carbon using sunlight. When they die, some sink as "detritus" that oceanic creatures eat or bacteria decompose. This "biological carbon pump" stores carbon in the deep ocean. Our study found that in warm southern waters, particles decompose quickly but more survive deeper trips. In cold northern waters, creatures eat more particles. Winter water mixing moves carbon down before spring algae bloom. Understanding these processes helps predict future ocean carbon storage.
Sergi Palomas, Mario C. Acosta, Gladys Utrera, and Etienne Tourigny
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3661–3679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present an automatic tool that optimizes resource distribution in coupled climate models, enhancing speed and reducing computational costs without requiring expert knowledge. Users can set energy/time criteria or limit resource usage. Tested on various European Community Earth System Model (EC-Earth) configurations and high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, it achieved up to 34 % faster simulations with fewer resources.
Manuel G. Marciani, Miguel Castrillo, Gladys Utrera, Mario C. Acosta, Bruno P. Kinoshita, and Francisco Doblas-Reyes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1104, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1104, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth System Model simulations are executed with workflows in congested HPC resources. These workflows could be made of thousands of tasks, which, if naively submitted to be executed, might add overheads due to queueing for resources. In this paper we explored a technique of aggregating tasks into a single submission. We related it to a key factor used by the software in charge of the scheduling. We find that this simple technique can reduce up to 7 % of the time spent in queue.
Kai Rasmus Keller, Marta Alerany Solé, and Mario Acosta
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1367, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1367, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Can we be sure that different computing environments, that should not change the model climate, indeed leave the climate unaltered? In this article, we present a novel methodology that answers whether two model climates are statistically the same. Besides a new methodology, able to detect significant differences between two model climates 60 % more accurately than a similar recent state-of-the-art method, we also provide an analysis on what actually constitutes a different climate.
Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Thomas Arsouze, Mario Acosta, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Miguel Castrillo, Eric Ferrer, Amanda Frigola, Daria Kuznetsova, Eneko Martin-Martinez, Pablo Ortega, and Sergi Palomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 461–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the high-resolution model version of the EC-Earth global climate model to contribute to HighResMIP. The combined model resolution is about 10–15 km in both the ocean and atmosphere, which makes it one of the finest ever used to complete historical and scenario simulations. This model is compared with two lower-resolution versions, with a 100 km and a 25 km grid. The three models are compared with observations to study the improvements thanks to the increased resolution.
Pedro José Roldán-Gómez, Paolo De Luca, Raffaele Bernardello, and Markus G. Donat
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Current trends in CO2 emissions increase the probability of an overshoot scenario in which temperatures exceed the targets of the Paris Agreement and are brought back afterwards with a net-negative emission strategy. This work analyses how the climate after the overshoot would differ from the climate before, linking large scale non-reversibility mechanisms to changes in regional climates and identifying those regions more impacted by changes in temperature and precipitation extremes.
Yona Silvy, Thomas L. Frölicher, Jens Terhaar, Fortunat Joos, Friedrich A. Burger, Fabrice Lacroix, Myles Allen, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan R. Buzan, Patricia Cadule, Martin Dix, John Dunne, Pierre Friedlingstein, Goran Georgievski, Tomohiro Hajima, Stuart Jenkins, Michio Kawamiya, Nancy Y. Kiang, Vladimir Lapin, Donghyun Lee, Paul Lerner, Nadine Mengis, Estela A. Monteiro, David Paynter, Glen P. Peters, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Sparrow, Eric Stofferahn, Jerry Tjiputra, Etienne Tourigny, and Tilo Ziehn
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1591–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The adaptive emission reduction approach is applied with Earth system models to generate temperature stabilization simulations. These simulations provide compatible emission pathways and budgets for a given warming level, uncovering uncertainty ranges previously missing in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project scenarios. These target-based emission-driven simulations offer a more coherent assessment across models for studying both the carbon cycle and its impacts under climate stabilization.
Colin G. Jones, Fanny Adloff, Ben B. B. Booth, Peter M. Cox, Veronika Eyring, Pierre Friedlingstein, Katja Frieler, Helene T. Hewitt, Hazel A. Jeffery, Sylvie Joussaume, Torben Koenigk, Bryan N. Lawrence, Eleanor O'Rourke, Malcolm J. Roberts, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Samuel Somot, Pier Luigi Vidale, Detlef van Vuuren, Mario Acosta, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Richard Betts, Ed Blockley, Julien Boé, Tom Bracegirdle, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Carlo Buontempo, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Markus Donat, Italo Epicoco, Pete Falloon, Sandro Fiore, Thomas Frölicher, Neven S. Fučkar, Matthew J. Gidden, Helge F. Goessling, Rune Grand Graversen, Silvio Gualdi, José M. Gutiérrez, Tatiana Ilyina, Daniela Jacob, Chris D. Jones, Martin Juckes, Elizabeth Kendon, Erik Kjellström, Reto Knutti, Jason Lowe, Matthew Mizielinski, Paola Nassisi, Michael Obersteiner, Pierre Regnier, Romain Roehrig, David Salas y Mélia, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Michael Schulz, Enrico Scoccimarro, Laurent Terray, Hannes Thiemann, Richard A. Wood, Shuting Yang, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1319–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a number of priority areas for the international climate research community to address over the coming decade. Advances in these areas will both increase our understanding of past and future Earth system change, including the societal and environmental impacts of this change, and deliver significantly improved scientific support to international climate policy, such as future IPCC assessments and the UNFCCC Global Stocktake.
Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa A. Marandino, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, and Rafel Simó
Biogeosciences, 21, 4439–4452, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4439-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4439-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the largest natural source of sulfur in the atmosphere and leads to the formation of cloud condensation nuclei. DMS emission and quantification of its impacts have large uncertainties, but a detailed study on the emissions and drivers of their uncertainty is missing to date. The emissions are usually calculated from the seawater DMS concentrations and a flux parameterization. Here we quantify the differences in DMS seawater products, which can affect DMS fluxes.
Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa A. Marandino, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, Mingxi Yang, and Rafel Simó
Biogeosciences, 21, 4453–4467, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4453-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4453-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the largest natural source of sulfur in the atmosphere and leads to the formation of cloud condensation nuclei. DMS emissions and quantification of their impacts have large uncertainties, but a detailed study on the range of emissions and drivers of their uncertainty is missing to date. The emissions are calculated from the seawater DMS concentrations and a flux parameterization. Here we quantify the differences in the effect of flux parameterizations used in models.
Raffaele Bernardello, Valentina Sicardi, Vladimir Lapin, Pablo Ortega, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Etienne Tourigny, and Eric Ferrer
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1255–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1255-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1255-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The ocean mitigates climate change by absorbing about 25 % of the carbon that is emitted to the atmosphere. However, ocean CO2 uptake is not constant in time, and improving our understanding of the mechanisms regulating this variability can potentially lead to a better predictive capability of its future behavior. In this study, we compare two ocean modeling practices that are used to reconstruct the historical ocean carbon uptake, demonstrating the abilities of one over the other.
Jenny Hieronymus, Magnus Hieronymus, Matthias Gröger, Jörg Schwinger, Raffaele Bernadello, Etienne Tourigny, Valentina Sicardi, Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, and Klaus Wyser
Biogeosciences, 21, 2189–2206, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2189-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2189-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The timing of the net primary production annual maxima in the North Atlantic in the period 1750–2100 is investigated using two Earth system models and the high-emissions scenario SSP5-8.5. It is found that, for most of the region, the annual maxima occur progressively earlier, with the most change occurring after the year 2000. Shifts in the seasonality of the primary production may impact the entire ecosystem, which highlights the need for long-term monitoring campaigns in this area.
Mario C. Acosta, Sergi Palomas, Stella V. Paronuzzi Ticco, Gladys Utrera, Joachim Biercamp, Pierre-Antoine Bretonniere, Reinhard Budich, Miguel Castrillo, Arnaud Caubel, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Italo Epicoco, Uwe Fladrich, Sylvie Joussaume, Alok Kumar Gupta, Bryan Lawrence, Philippe Le Sager, Grenville Lister, Marie-Pierre Moine, Jean-Christophe Rioual, Sophie Valcke, Niki Zadeh, and Venkatramani Balaji
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a collection of performance metrics gathered during the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), a worldwide initiative to study climate change. We analyse the metrics that resulted from collaboration efforts among many partners and models and describe our findings to demonstrate the utility of our study for the scientific community. The research contributes to understanding climate modelling performance on the current high-performance computing (HPC) architectures.
George Manville, Thomas G. Bell, Jane P. Mulcahy, Rafel Simó, Martí Galí, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, and Paul R. Halloran
Biogeosciences, 20, 1813–1828, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1813-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1813-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first global investigation of controls on seawater dimethylsulfide (DMS) spatial variability over scales of up to 100 km. Sea surface height anomalies, density, and chlorophyll a help explain almost 80 % of DMS variability. The results suggest that physical and biogeochemical processes play an equally important role in controlling DMS variability. These data provide independent confirmation that existing parameterisations of seawater DMS concentration use appropriate variables.
Flavienne Bruyant, Rémi Amiraux, Marie-Pier Amyot, Philippe Archambault, Lise Artigue, Lucas Barbedo de Freitas, Guislain Bécu, Simon Bélanger, Pascaline Bourgain, Annick Bricaud, Etienne Brouard, Camille Brunet, Tonya Burgers, Danielle Caleb, Katrine Chalut, Hervé Claustre, Véronique Cornet-Barthaux, Pierre Coupel, Marine Cusa, Fanny Cusset, Laeticia Dadaglio, Marty Davelaar, Gabrièle Deslongchamps, Céline Dimier, Julie Dinasquet, Dany Dumont, Brent Else, Igor Eulaers, Joannie Ferland, Gabrielle Filteau, Marie-Hélène Forget, Jérome Fort, Louis Fortier, Martí Galí, Morgane Gallinari, Svend-Erik Garbus, Nicole Garcia, Catherine Gérikas Ribeiro, Colline Gombault, Priscilla Gourvil, Clémence Goyens, Cindy Grant, Pierre-Luc Grondin, Pascal Guillot, Sandrine Hillion, Rachel Hussherr, Fabien Joux, Hannah Joy-Warren, Gabriel Joyal, David Kieber, Augustin Lafond, José Lagunas, Patrick Lajeunesse, Catherine Lalande, Jade Larivière, Florence Le Gall, Karine Leblanc, Mathieu Leblanc, Justine Legras, Keith Lévesque, Kate-M. Lewis, Edouard Leymarie, Aude Leynaert, Thomas Linkowski, Martine Lizotte, Adriana Lopes dos Santos, Claudie Marec, Dominique Marie, Guillaume Massé, Philippe Massicotte, Atsushi Matsuoka, Lisa A. Miller, Sharif Mirshak, Nathalie Morata, Brivaela Moriceau, Philippe-Israël Morin, Simon Morisset, Anders Mosbech, Alfonso Mucci, Gabrielle Nadaï, Christian Nozais, Ingrid Obernosterer, Thimoté Paire, Christos Panagiotopoulos, Marie Parenteau, Noémie Pelletier, Marc Picheral, Bernard Quéguiner, Patrick Raimbault, Joséphine Ras, Eric Rehm, Llúcia Ribot Lacosta, Jean-François Rontani, Blanche Saint-Béat, Julie Sansoulet, Noé Sardet, Catherine Schmechtig, Antoine Sciandra, Richard Sempéré, Caroline Sévigny, Jordan Toullec, Margot Tragin, Jean-Éric Tremblay, Annie-Pier Trottier, Daniel Vaulot, Anda Vladoiu, Lei Xue, Gustavo Yunda-Guarin, and Marcel Babin
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4607–4642, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4607-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4607-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a dataset acquired during a research cruise held in Baffin Bay in 2016. We observed that the disappearance of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean increases both the length and spatial extent of the phytoplankton growth season. In the future, this will impact the food webs on which the local populations depend for their food supply and fisheries. This dataset will provide insight into quantifying these impacts and help the decision-making process for policymakers.
Shrivardhan Hulswar, Rafel Simó, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, Arancha Lana, Swaleha Inamdar, Paul R. Halloran, George Manville, and Anoop Sharad Mahajan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2963–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The third climatological estimation of sea surface dimethyl sulfide (DMS) concentrations based on in situ measurements was created (DMS-Rev3). The update includes a much larger input dataset and includes improvements in the data unification, filtering, and smoothing algorithm. The DMS-Rev3 climatology provides more realistic monthly estimates of DMS, and shows significant regional differences compared to past climatologies.
Enza Di Tomaso, Jerónimo Escribano, Sara Basart, Paul Ginoux, Francesca Macchia, Francesca Barnaba, Francesco Benincasa, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Arnau Buñuel, Miguel Castrillo, Emilio Cuevas, Paola Formenti, María Gonçalves, Oriol Jorba, Martina Klose, Lucia Mona, Gilbert Montané Pinto, Michail Mytilinaios, Vincenzo Obiso, Miriam Olid, Nick Schutgens, Athanasios Votsis, Ernest Werner, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2785–2816, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MONARCH reanalysis of desert dust aerosols extends the existing observation-based information for mineral dust monitoring by providing 3-hourly upper-air, surface and total column key geophysical variables of the dust cycle over Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe, at a 0.1° horizontal resolution in a rotated grid, from 2007 to 2016. This work provides evidence of the high accuracy of this data set and its suitability for air quality and health and climate service applications.
Matthew L. Dawson, Christian Guzman, Jeffrey H. Curtis, Mario Acosta, Shupeng Zhu, Donald Dabdub, Andrew Conley, Matthew West, Nicole Riemer, and Oriol Jorba
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3663–3689, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3663-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3663-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Progress in identifying complex, mixed-phase physicochemical processes has resulted in an advanced understanding of the evolution of atmospheric systems but has also introduced a level of complexity that few atmospheric models were designed to handle. We present a flexible treatment for multiphase chemical processes for models of diverse scale, from box up to global models. This enables users to build a customized multiphase mechanism that is accessible to a much wider community.
Ralf Döscher, Mario Acosta, Andrea Alessandri, Peter Anthoni, Thomas Arsouze, Tommi Bergman, Raffaele Bernardello, Souhail Boussetta, Louis-Philippe Caron, Glenn Carver, Miguel Castrillo, Franco Catalano, Ivana Cvijanovic, Paolo Davini, Evelien Dekker, Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, David Docquier, Pablo Echevarria, Uwe Fladrich, Ramon Fuentes-Franco, Matthias Gröger, Jost v. Hardenberg, Jenny Hieronymus, M. Pasha Karami, Jukka-Pekka Keskinen, Torben Koenigk, Risto Makkonen, François Massonnet, Martin Ménégoz, Paul A. Miller, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Lars Nieradzik, Twan van Noije, Paul Nolan, Declan O'Donnell, Pirkka Ollinaho, Gijs van den Oord, Pablo Ortega, Oriol Tintó Prims, Arthur Ramos, Thomas Reerink, Clement Rousset, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Philippe Le Sager, Torben Schmith, Roland Schrödner, Federico Serva, Valentina Sicardi, Marianne Sloth Madsen, Benjamin Smith, Tian Tian, Etienne Tourigny, Petteri Uotila, Martin Vancoppenolle, Shiyu Wang, David Wårlind, Ulrika Willén, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, and Qiong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2973–3020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system model EC-Earth3 is documented here. Key performance metrics show physical behavior and biases well within the frame known from recent models. With improved physical and dynamic features, new ESM components, community tools, and largely improved physical performance compared to the CMIP5 version, EC-Earth3 represents a clear step forward for the only European community ESM. We demonstrate here that EC-Earth3 is suited for a range of tasks in CMIP6 and beyond.
Martí Galí, Marcus Falls, Hervé Claustre, Olivier Aumont, and Raffaele Bernardello
Biogeosciences, 19, 1245–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1245-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1245-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Part of the organic matter produced by plankton in the upper ocean is exported to the deep ocean. This process, known as the biological carbon pump, is key for the regulation of atmospheric carbon dioxide and global climate. However, the dynamics of organic particles below the upper ocean layer are not well understood. Here we compared the measurements acquired by autonomous robots in the top 1000 m of the ocean to a numerical model, which can help improve future climate projections.
Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Gijs van den Oord, Mario C. Acosta, and Glenn D. Carver
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 379–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate prediction models produce a large volume of simulated data that sometimes might not be efficiently managed. In this paper we present an approach to address this issue by reducing the computing time and storage space. As a case study, we analyse the output writing process of the ECMWF atmospheric model called IFS, and we integrate into it a data writing tool called XIOS. The results suggest that the integration between the two components achieves an adequate computational performance.
Roberto Bilbao, Simon Wild, Pablo Ortega, Juan Acosta-Navarro, Thomas Arsouze, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Louis-Philippe Caron, Miguel Castrillo, Rubén Cruz-García, Ivana Cvijanovic, Francisco Javier Doblas-Reyes, Markus Donat, Emanuel Dutra, Pablo Echevarría, An-Chi Ho, Saskia Loosveldt-Tomas, Eduardo Moreno-Chamarro, Núria Pérez-Zanon, Arthur Ramos, Yohan Ruprich-Robert, Valentina Sicardi, Etienne Tourigny, and Javier Vegas-Regidor
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 173–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-173-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-173-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents and evaluates a set of retrospective decadal predictions with the EC-Earth3 climate model. These experiments successfully predict past changes in surface air temperature but show poor predictive capacity in the subpolar North Atlantic, a well-known source region of decadal climate variability. The poor predictive capacity is linked to an initial shock affecting the Atlantic Ocean circulation, ultimately due to a suboptimal representation of the Labrador Sea density.
Betty Croft, Randall V. Martin, Richard H. Moore, Luke D. Ziemba, Ewan C. Crosbie, Hongyu Liu, Lynn M. Russell, Georges Saliba, Armin Wisthaler, Markus Müller, Arne Schiller, Martí Galí, Rachel Y.-W. Chang, Erin E. McDuffie, Kelsey R. Bilsback, and Jeffrey R. Pierce
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1889–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
North Atlantic Aerosols and Marine Ecosystems Study measurements combined with GEOS-Chem-TOMAS modeling suggest that several not-well-understood key factors control northwest Atlantic aerosol number and size. These synergetic and climate-relevant factors include particle formation near and above the marine boundary layer top, particle growth by marine secondary organic aerosol on descent, particle formation/growth related to dimethyl sulfide, sea spray aerosol, and ship emissions.
Cited articles
Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Kidston, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Jones,
C., Jung, M., Myneni, R., and Zhu, R.: Evaluating the Land and Ocean
Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models,
J. Climate, 26, 6801–6843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1, 2013. a
Aumont, O., van Hulten, M., Roy-Barman, M., Dutay, J.-C., Éthé, C., and Gehlen, M.: Variable reactivity of particulate organic matter in a global ocean biogeochemical model, Biogeosciences, 14, 2321–2341, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2321-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Ayata, S. D., Lévy, M., Aumont, O., Sciandra, A., Sainte-Marie, J., Tagliabue,
A., and Bernard, O.: Phytoplankton growth formulation in marine ecosystem
models: Should we take into account photo-acclimation and variable
stoichiometry in oligotrophic areas?, J. Marine Syst., 125, 29–40,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.12.010, 2013. a, b, c
Bagniewski, W., Fennel, K., Perry, M. J., and D'Asaro, E. A.: Optimizing models of the North Atlantic spring bloom using physical, chemical and bio-optical observations from a Lagrangian float, Biogeosciences, 8, 1291–1307, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1291-2011, 2011. a
Belcher, A., Iversen, M., Giering, S., Riou, V., Henson, S. A., Berline, L., Guilloux, L., and Sanders, R.: Depth-resolved particle-associated microbial respiration in the northeast Atlantic, Biogeosciences, 13, 4927–4943, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4927-2016, 2016. a
Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A., and Weber, T.:
Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean, Nature,
568, 327–335, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1098-2, 2019. a
Briggs, N., Dall'Olmo, G., and Claustre, H.: Major role of particle
fragmentation in regulating biological sequestration of CO2 by the oceans, Science,
367, 791–793, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay1790, 2020. a
Broekema, C.P. Van Nieuwpoort, R. V. and Bal, H. E.: ExaScale high performance
computing in the square kilometer array, Astro-HPC, 12, 9–16,
https://doi.org/10.1145/2286976.2286982, 2012. a
Burd, A., Hansell, D., Steinberg, D., Anderson, T., Arístegui, J., Baltar, F.,
Beaupré, S. R., Buesseler, K., DeHairs, F., Jackson, G., Kadko, D.,
Koppelmann, R., Lampitt, R., Nagata, T., Reinthaler, T., Robinson, C.,
Robison, B. H., Tamburini, C., and Tanaka, T.: Assessing the apparent
imbalance between geochemical and biochemical indicators of meso- and
bathypelagic biological activity: What the is wrong with present calculations
of carbon budgets?, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 57, 1557–1571, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.022, 2010. a
Casanova, H., Legrand, A., and Robert, Y.: Parallel Algortihms, Chapman and
hall/CBC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781584889465, 2011. a
Claustre, H., Johnson, K., and Takeshita, Y.: Observing the Global Ocean with
Biogeochemical-Argo, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 12, 23–48,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010956, 2020. a
De Jong, K. A., Spears, W. M., and Gordon, D. F.: Using genetic algorithms for
concept learning, Mach. Learn., 13, 161–188, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993042,
1993. a
Dueben, P. D. and Bauer, P.: Challenges and design choices for global weather and climate models based on machine learning, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3999–4009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3999-2018, 2018. a
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016. a
Falls, M., Galí, M.m and Castrillo, M.: Genetic Algorithm Pisces 1D Workflow and config files, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5205760, 2021. a
Fasham, M. J. R., Ducklow, H. W., and McKelvie, S. M.: A nitrogen-based model
of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer, J. Mar. Res.,
48, 591–639, https://doi.org/10.1357/002224090784984678, 1990. a, b
Fennel, K., Losch, M., Schroter, J., and Wenzel, M.: Testing a marine ecosystem
model: sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization, J. Marine
Syst., 28, 45–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00083-X, 2000. a
Flato, G.: Earth system models: an overview, WIREs Clim. Change, 2, 783–800,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.148, 2011. a
Friedrichs, M. A., Dusenberry, J. A., Anderson, L. A., Armstrong, R. A., Chai,
F., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J., Fujii, M., Hood, R.,
McGillicuddy Jr., D. J., Moore, J. K., Schartau, M., Spitz, Y. H., and
Wiggert, J. D.: Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine
biogeochemical models: Role of multiple planktonic groups, J.
Geophys. Res., 112, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003852, 2007. a, b, c
Galbraith, E. D., Dunne, J. P., Gnanadesikan, A., Slater, R. D., Sarmiento,
J. L., Dufour, C. O., de Souza, G. F., Bianchi, D., Claret, M., Rodgers,
K. B., and Marvasti, S. S.: Complex functionality with minimal computation:
Promise and pitfalls of reduced‐tracer ocean biogeochemistry models,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 2012–2018,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000463, 2015. a
Galí, M., Benardello, R., Falls, M., Claustre, H., and Aumont, O.: Datasets for the comparison between POC estimated from BGC-Argo floats and PISCES model simulations (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5139602, 2021a. a
Galí, M., Benardello, R., Falls, M., Claustre, H., and Aumont, O.: PISCES-v2 1D configuration used to study POC dynamics as observed by BGC-Argo floats, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5243343, 2021b. a
Gaudier, F.: URANIE: The CEA/DEN Uncertainty and Sensitivity platform, Sixth
International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, 2,
7660–7661, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.166, 2010. a
Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Emprin, N., Aumont, O., Heinze, C., and Ragueneau, O.: Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment composition in a global biogeochemical ocean model, Biogeosciences, 3, 521–537, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006, 2006. a
Goncalves, J. and Resende, M.: Biased random-key genetic algorithms for
combinatorial optimization, J. Heuristics, 17, 487–525,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-010-9143-1, 2011. a, b
Gruber, N., Clement, D., Carter, B. R., Feely, R. A., Heuven, S., Hoppema, M.,
Ishii, M., Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Lauvset, S. K., Lo Monaco, C., Mathis,
J. T., Murata, A., Olsen, A., Perez, F. F., Sabine, C. L., Tanhua, T., and
Wanninkhof, R.: The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007,
Science, 363, 1193–1199, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5153, 2019. a
Guidi, L., Legendre, L., Reygondeau, G., Uitz, J., Stemmann, L., and Henson,
S. A.: A new look at ocean carbon remineralization for estimating deepwater
sequestration, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1044–1059,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005063, 2015. a
Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., Madsen, E., J., M. P., Le Moigne, F., and Quartly,
G. D.: A reduced estimate of the strength of the ocean's biological carbon
pump, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046735, 2011. a
Henson, S. A., Laufkötter, C., Leung, S., Giering, S. L. C., Palevsky, H., and
Cavan, E. L.: Uncertain response of ocean biological carbon export in a
changing world, Nat. Geosci., 15, 248–254,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00927-0, 2022. a, b, c
Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates, Biogeosciences, 7, 2613–2624, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010, 2010. a
Jackson, G. A.: Flux feeding as a mechanism for zooplankton grazing and its
implications for vertical particulate flux, Limnol. Oceanogr., 38,
1328–1331, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1993.38.6.1328, 1993. a
Júnior, B., Costa, R., Pinheiro, P., Luiz, J., Araújo, L., and Grichshenko,
A.: A biased random-key genetic algorithm using dotted board model for
solving two-dimensional irregular strip packing problems, Conference: 2020
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC),
https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185794, 2020. a
Kriest, I., Kähler, P., Koeve, W., Kvale, K., Sauerland, V., and Oschlies, A.: One size fits all? Calibrating an ocean biogeochemistry model for different circulations, Biogeosciences, 17, 3057–3082, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Löptien, U. and Dietze, H.: Reciprocal bias compensation and ensuing uncertainties in model-based climate projections: pelagic biogeochemistry versus ocean mixing, Biogeosciences, 16, 1865–1881, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-1865-2019, 2019. a, b
Madec, G., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Ethé, C., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lévy, C., Lovato, T., Martin, M., Masson, S., Mocavero, S., Rousset, S., Storkey, D., Müeller, S., Nurser, G., Bell, M., Samson, G., and Moulin, A.: NEMO ocean engine. In Notes du Pôle de modélisation de l'Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) (v4.0, Number 27), Zenodo [data set] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878122, 2022. a, b
Manubens-Gil, D., Vegas-Regidor, J., Prodhomme, C., Mula-Valls, O., and
Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: Seamless management of ensemble climate prediction
experiments on hpc platforms, 2016 International Conference on High
Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), 895–900,
https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568429, 2016. a, b, c
Marsay, C. M., Sanders, R. J., Henson, S. A., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg,
E. P., and Lampitt, R. S.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon
flux through the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 112, 1089–1094,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415311112, 2015. a
Martin, A., Boyd, P., Buesseler, K., Cetinic, I., Claustre, H., Giering, S.,
Henson, S., Irigoien, X., Kriest, I., Memery, L., Robinson, C., Saba, G.,
Sanders, R. Siegel, D., Villa-Alfageme, M., and Guidi, L.: The oceans'
twilight zone must be studied now, before it is too late, Nature, 580,
26–28, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00915-7, 2020. a
Matear, R.: Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using
simulated annealing: A case study at Station P, J. Mar. Res.,
53, 571–607, https://doi.org/10.1357/0022240953213098, 1995. a
Oana, L. and Spataru, A.: Use of Genetic Algorithms in Numerical Weather
Prediction, 18th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms
for Scientific Computing (SYNASC), 456–461,
https://doi.org/10.1109/SYNASC.2016.075., 2016. a, b
Pahlow, M., Dietze, H., and Oschlies, A.: Optimality-based model of
phytoplankton growth and diazotrophy, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 489, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10449, 2013. a
Palmer, T. N.: A Nonlinear Dynamical Perspective on Climate Prediction, J. Climate, 12, 575–591, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0575:ANDPOC>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Palmer, T. N.: Record-breaking winters and global climate change, Science, 344,
803–804, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255147, 2014. a
Roemmich, D., Alford, M. H., C. H., Johnson, K., King, B., Moum, J., Oke, P.,
Owens, W., Brechner, P. S., Purkey, S., M., S., Suga, T., Wijffels, S.,
Zilberman, N., Bakker, D., Baringer, M., Belbeoch, M., Bittig, H. C., Boss,
E., Calil, P., Carse, F., Carval, T., Chai, F., O'Conchubhair, D.,
d'Ortenzio, F., Dall'Olmo, G., Desbruyeres, D., Fennel, K., Fer, I.,
Ferrari, R., Forget, G., Freeland, H., Fujiki, T., Gehlen, M., Greenan, B.,
Hallberg, R., Hibiya, T., Hosoda, S., Jayne, S., Jochum, M., Johnson, G. C.,
Kang, K., Kolodziejczyk, N., Körtzinger, A., Le Traon, P. Y., Lenn, Y.,
Maze, G., Mork, K. A., Morris, T., Nagai, T., Nash, J., Garabato, A. N.,
Olsen, A., Pattabhi, R. R., Prakash, S., Riser, S., Schmechtig, C., Schmid,
C., Shroyer, E., Sterl, A., Sutton, P., Talley, L., Tanhua, T., Thierry, V.,
Thomalla, S., Toole, J., Troisi, A., Trull, T. W., Turton, J., Velez-Belchi,
P. J., Walczowski, W., Wang, H., Wanninkhof, R., Waterhouse, A. F., Waterman,
S., Watson, A., Wilson, C., Wong, A. P. S., Xu, J., and Yasuda, I.: On the
Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array, Front.
Mar. Sci., https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00439, 2019. a
Rueda-Bayona, J. G., Guzman, A., and Silva, R.: Genetic algorithms to determine
JONSWAP spectra parameters, Ocean Dynam., 70, 561–571,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01341-8, 2020. a
Schlitzer, R.: Export Production in the Equatorial and North Pacific Derived
from Dissolved Oxygen, Nutrient and Carbon Data, J. Oceangr., 60,
53–62, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038318.38916.e6, 2004. a
Seferian, R. amd Berthet, S., Yool, A., Palmieri, J., Bopp, L., Tagliabue, A.,
Kwiatkowski, L., Aumont, O., Christian, J., Dunne, J., Gehlen, M., Ilyina,
T., John, J. G., Li, H., Long, M., Luo, J. Y., Nakano, H., Romanou, A.,
Schwinger, J., Stock, C., Santana-Falcón, Y., Takano, Y., Tjiputra, J.,
Tsujino, H., Watanabe, M., Wu, T., Wu, F., and Yamamoto, A.: Tracking
improvement in simulated marine biogeochemistry between CMIP5 and CMIP6,
Current Climate Change Reports, 6, 95–119,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-020-00160-0, 2020. a
Shu, C., Xiu, P., Xing, X., Qiu, G., Ma, W., Brewin, R., and Ciavatta, S.:
Biogeochemical Model Optimization by Using Satellite-Derived Phytoplankton
Functional Type Data and BGC-Argo Observations in the Northern South China
Sea, Remote Sensing, 14, 1297, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051297, 2022. a
Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., and Gorsky, G.: A vertical model of particle size
distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that includes biological and
physical processes – Part II: application to a three year survey in the NW
Mediterranean Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51, 885–908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.03.002., 2004. a
Stukel, M. R., Ohman, M. D., Kelly, T. B., and Biard, T.: The Roles of
Suspension-Feeding and Flux-Feeding Zooplankton as Gatekeepers of Particle
Flux Into the Mesopelagic Ocean in the Northeast Pacific, Front. Mar.
Sci., 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00397, 2019. a
Uruchi, W., Castrillo, M., and Beltran, D.: Autosubmit GUI: A Javascript-based
Graphical User Interface to Monitor Experiments Workflow Execution, J.
Open Source Softw., 6, 3049, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03049, 2021. a, b
Ward, B. A., Friedruchs, M., Anderson, T. R., and Oschlies, A.: Contributions
from Advances in Marine Ecosystem Modelling Research II 23–26 June 2008,
Plymouth, UK, J. Marine Syst., 81, 34–43,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.005, 2010. a, b
Weber, T., Cram, J. A., Leung, S. W., DeVries, T., and Deutsch, C.: Deep ocean
nutrients imply large latitudinal variation in particle transfer efficiency,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 8606–8611, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604414113, 2016. a
Wilson, J. D., Ridgwell, A., and Barker, S.: Can organic matter flux profiles be diagnosed using remineralisation rates derived from observed tracers and modelled ocean transport rates?, Biogeosciences, 12, 5547–5562, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5547-2015, 2015. a
Short summary
This paper describes and tests a method which uses a genetic algorithm (GA), a type of optimisation algorithm, on an ocean biogeochemical model. The aim is to produce a set of numerical parameters that best reflect the observed data of particulate organic carbon in a specific region of the ocean. We show that the GA can provide optimised model parameters in a robust and efficient manner and can also help detect model limitations, ultimately leading to a reduction in the model uncertainties.
This paper describes and tests a method which uses a genetic algorithm (GA), a type of...
Special issue