Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6605-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6605-2021
Model evaluation paper
 | 
29 Oct 2021
Model evaluation paper |  | 29 Oct 2021

Comparing an exponential respiration model to alternative models for soil respiration components in a Canadian wildfire chronosequence (FireResp v1.0)

John Zobitz, Heidi Aaltonen, Xuan Zhou, Frank Berninger, Jukka Pumpanen, and Kajar Köster

Viewed

Total article views: 2,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,751 465 72 2,288 249 46 42
  • HTML: 1,751
  • PDF: 465
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 2,288
  • Supplement: 249
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,106 with geography defined and 182 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
Forest fires heavily affect carbon stocks and fluxes of carbon in high-latitude forests. Long-term trends in soil respiration following forest fires are associated with recovery of aboveground biomass. We evaluated models for soil autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration with data from a chronosequence of stand-replacing forest fires in northern Canada. The best model that reproduced expected patterns in soil respiration components takes into account soil microbe carbon as a model variable.