Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5891-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5891-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
29 Sep 2021
Methods for assessment of models |
| 29 Sep 2021
| 29 Sep 2021
Using the International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) records as century-long benchmarks for global land-surface models
Department of Ecological Sciences, VU University, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Jonathan Barichivich
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CNRS/CEA/UVSQ, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Brasil 2950, Chile
Philippe Peylin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CNRS/CEA/UVSQ, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Vanessa Haverd
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
deceased, 29 January 2021
Matthew Joseph McGrath
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CNRS/CEA/UVSQ, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Nicolas Vuichard
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CNRS/CEA/UVSQ, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Michael Neil Evans
Department of Geology & ESSIC, University of Maryland, MD 20742-4211, USA
Flurin Babst
Dendro Sciences Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Department of Ecological Sciences, VU University, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Related authors
Guillaume Marie, Jina Jeong, Hervé Jactel, Gunnar Petter, Maxime Cailleret, Matthew J. McGrath, Vladislav Bastrikov, Josefine Ghattas, Bertrand Guenet, Anne Sofie Lansø, Kim Naudts, Aude Valade, Chao Yue, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8023–8047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research looks at how climate change influences forests, and particularly how altered wind and insect activities could make forests emit instead of absorb carbon. We have updated a land surface model called ORCHIDEE to better examine the effect of bark beetles on forest health. Our findings suggest that sudden events, such as insect outbreaks, can dramatically affect carbon storage, offering crucial insights into tackling climate change.
Rémi Gaillard, Patricia Cadule, Philippe Peylin, Nicolas Vuichard, and Bertrand Guenet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3656, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3656, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The release of carbon from thawing permafrost soils could amplify future climate warming. However, this feedback is highly uncertain because most Earth system models (ESM) do not represent permafrost carbon. We have improved the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace ESM by including permafrost physical, carbon and nitrogen processes to better represent Arctic ecosystems. The model more accurately represents past and present permafrost physics and biogeochemistry, paving the way for future projections.
Jon Cranko Page, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andy J. Pitman, Isaac R. Towers, Gabriele Arduini, Martin J. Best, Craig Ferguson, Jürgen Knauer, Hyungjun Kim, David M. Lawrence, Tomoko Nitta, Keith W. Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Anna Ukkola, Nicholas Vuichard, and Gab Abramowitz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4149, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4149, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
This paper used a large dataset of observations, machine learning predictions, and computer model simulations to test how well land surface models represent the water, energy, and carbon cycles. We found that the models work well under "normal" weather but do not meet performance expectations during coinciding extreme conditions. Since these extremes are relatively rare, targeted model improvements could deliver major performance gains.
Lei Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Yitong Yao, Daniel Goll, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Isabel Martínez Cano, Arthur Fendrich, Laurent Li, Hui Yang, Sassan Saatchi, Ricardo Dalagnol, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4915–4933, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4915-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4915-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study enhances the accuracy of modeling the carbon dynamics of the Amazon rainforest by optimizing key model parameters based on satellite data. Using spatially varying parameters for tree mortality and photosynthesis, we improved predictions of biomass, productivity, and tree mortality. Our findings highlight the critical role of wood density and water availability in forest processes, offering insights to use in refining global carbon cycle models.
Michael N. Evans, Lucie J. Lücke, Kevin J. Fan, and Feng Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-364, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-364, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a database of databases (DoD2k) for Common Era (1–2000 A.D.) paleoclimate research. The DoD2k leverages existing code and 5 curated databases, eliminates duplicates, and contains 4613 records. We analyze for common features across moisture and temperature sensitive records, and we test cave carbonate data simulations against observations. DoD2k is expected to be useful for detecting climate change on decadal timescales and for improving data models and paleoclimate reconstructions.
Amali A. Amali, Clemens Schwingshackl, Akihiko Ito, Alina Barbu, Christine Delire, Daniele Peano, David M. Lawrence, David Wårlind, Eddy Robertson, Edouard L. Davin, Elena Shevliakova, Ian N. Harman, Nicolas Vuichard, Paul A. Miller, Peter J. Lawrence, Tilo Ziehn, Tomohiro Hajima, Victor Brovkin, Yanwu Zhang, Vivek K. Arora, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 803–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-803-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-803-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explored the impact of anthropogenic land-use change (LUC) on climate dynamics, focusing on biogeophysical (BGP) and biogeochemical (BGC) effects using data from the Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We found that LUC-induced carbon emissions contribute to a BGC warming of 0.21 °C, with BGC effects dominating globally over BGP effects, which show regional variability. Our findings highlight discrepancies in model simulations and emphasize the need for improved representations of LUC processes.
Espoir Koudjo Gaglo, Emeline Chaste, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Olivier Roupsard, Christophe Jourdan, Sidy Sow, Nadeige Vandewalle, Frédéric Do, Daouda Ngom, and Aude Valade
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1102, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Agroforestry in the Sahel help store carbon and support food production, but land surface models struggle to capture their dynamics. We adapted the ORCHIDEE model to simulate Faidherbia albida, a tree that taps deep groundwater. This work highlights the need to integrate deep water uptake in land surface models for groundwater-dependent ecosystems, as it could enhance predictions, helping to sustain agroforestry in a changing climate.
Cheng Gong, Yan Wang, Hanqin Tian, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1416, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1416, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our results showed substantially varied fertilizer-induced soil NOx emissions in 2019 from 0.84 to 2.2 Tg N yr-1 globally. Such variations further lead to 0.3 to 3.3 ppbv summertime ozone enhancement in agricultural hotspot regions and 7.1 ppbv to 16.6 ppbv reductions in global methane concentrations
Nikolina Mileva, Julia Pongratz, Vivek K. Arora, Akihiko Ito, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Sonali S. McDermid, Paul A. Miller, Daniele Peano, Roland Séférian, Yanwu Zhang, and Wolfgang Buermann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-979, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-979, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Despite forests being so important for mitigating climate change, there are still uncertainties about how much the changes in forest cover contribute to the cooling/warming of the climate. Climate models and real-world observations often disagree about the magnitude and even the direction of these changes. We constrain climate models scenarios of widespread deforestation with satellite and in-situ data and show that models still have difficulties representing the movement of heat and water.
Maureen Beaudor, Didier Hauglustaine, Juliette Lathière, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Nicolas Vuichard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2017–2046, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2017-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Agriculture is the biggest ammonia (NH3) source, impacting air quality, climate, and ecosystems. Because of food demand, NH3 emissions are projected to rise by 2100. Using a global model, we analyzed the impact of present and future NH3 emissions generated from a land model. Our results show improved ammonia patterns compared to a reference inventory. Future scenarios predict up to 70 % increase in global NH3 burden, with significant changes in radiative forcing that can greatly elevate N2O.
Simon Beylat, Nina Raoult, Cédric Bacour, Natalie Douglas, Tristan Quaife, Vladislav Bastrikov, Peter Julien Rayner, and Philippe Peylin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-109, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-109, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface models are important tools for understanding and predicting the land components of the carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO2 concentration data is a valuable source of information that can be used to improve the accuracy of these models. In this study, we present a statistical method named 4DEnVar to calibrate parameters of a land surface model using this data. We show that this method is easy to implement and more efficient and accurate than traditional methods.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Guillaume Marie, Jina Jeong, Hervé Jactel, Gunnar Petter, Maxime Cailleret, Matthew J. McGrath, Vladislav Bastrikov, Josefine Ghattas, Bertrand Guenet, Anne Sofie Lansø, Kim Naudts, Aude Valade, Chao Yue, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8023–8047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research looks at how climate change influences forests, and particularly how altered wind and insect activities could make forests emit instead of absorb carbon. We have updated a land surface model called ORCHIDEE to better examine the effect of bark beetles on forest health. Our findings suggest that sudden events, such as insect outbreaks, can dramatically affect carbon storage, offering crucial insights into tackling climate change.
Jaime A. Riano Sanchez, Nicolas Vuichard, and Philippe Peylin
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1227–1253, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1227-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify the projected change in land carbon store (CLCS) for different socioeconomic scenarios (SSPs). Using factorial simulations of a land surface model, we estimate the CLCS uncertainties associated with land use change (LUC) and nitrogen (N) deposition trajectories. Our study highlights the need for delivering additional LUC and N deposition trajectories from integrated assessment models for each SSP in order to accurately assess their impacts on the carbon cycle and climate.
Nina Raoult, Simon Beylat, James M. Salter, Frédéric Hourdin, Vladislav Bastrikov, Catherine Ottlé, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5779–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use computer models to predict how the land surface will respond to climate change. However, these complex models do not always simulate what we observe in real life, limiting their effectiveness. To improve their accuracy, we use sophisticated statistical and computational techniques. We test a technique called history matching against more common approaches. This method adapts well to these models, helping us better understand how they work and therefore how to make them more realistic.
Hanqin Tian, Naiqing Pan, Rona L. Thompson, Josep G. Canadell, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Pierre Regnier, Eric A. Davidson, Michael Prather, Philippe Ciais, Marilena Muntean, Shufen Pan, Wilfried Winiwarter, Sönke Zaehle, Feng Zhou, Robert B. Jackson, Hermann W. Bange, Sarah Berthet, Zihao Bian, Daniele Bianchi, Alexander F. Bouwman, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Geoffrey Dutton, Minpeng Hu, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Fortunat Joos, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Angela Landolfi, Ronny Lauerwald, Ya Li, Chaoqun Lu, Taylor Maavara, Manfredi Manizza, Dylan B. Millet, Jens Mühle, Prabir K. Patra, Glen P. Peters, Xiaoyu Qin, Peter Raymond, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Hao Shi, Qing Sun, Daniele Tonina, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Junjie Wang, Kelley C. Wells, Luke M. Western, Chris Wilson, Jia Yang, Yuanzhi Yao, Yongfa You, and Qing Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2543–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 273 times more potent than carbon dioxide, have increased by 25 % since the preindustrial period, with the highest observed growth rate in 2020 and 2021. This rapid growth rate has primarily been due to a 40 % increase in anthropogenic emissions since 1980. Observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded the worst-case climate scenario, underscoring the importance of reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions.
Nina Raoult, Louis-Axel Edouard-Rambaut, Nicolas Vuichard, Vladislav Bastrikov, Anne Sofie Lansø, Bertrand Guenet, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 21, 1017–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1017-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1017-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations are used to reduce uncertainty in land surface models (LSMs) by optimising poorly constraining parameters. However, optimising against current conditions does not necessarily ensure that the parameters treated as invariant will be robust in a changing climate. Manipulation experiments offer us a unique chance to optimise our models under different (here atmospheric CO2) conditions. By using these data in optimisations, we gain confidence in the future projections of LSMs.
Nico Wunderling, Anna S. von der Heydt, Yevgeny Aksenov, Stephen Barker, Robbin Bastiaansen, Victor Brovkin, Maura Brunetti, Victor Couplet, Thomas Kleinen, Caroline H. Lear, Johannes Lohmann, Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta, Sacha Sinet, Didier Swingedouw, Ricarda Winkelmann, Pallavi Anand, Jonathan Barichivich, Sebastian Bathiany, Mara Baudena, John T. Bruun, Cristiano M. Chiessi, Helen K. Coxall, David Docquier, Jonathan F. Donges, Swinda K. J. Falkena, Ann Kristin Klose, David Obura, Juan Rocha, Stefanie Rynders, Norman Julius Steinert, and Matteo Willeit
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 41–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-41-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-41-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper maps out the state-of-the-art literature on interactions between tipping elements relevant for current global warming pathways. We find indications that many of the interactions between tipping elements are destabilizing. This means that tipping cascades cannot be ruled out on centennial to millennial timescales at global warming levels between 1.5 and 2.0 °C or on shorter timescales if global warming surpasses 2.0 °C.
Mounia Mostefaoui, Philippe Ciais, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Prabir K. Patra, and Yolandi Ernst
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 245–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-245-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our aim is to assess African anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and removals by using different data products, including inventories and process-based models, and to compare their relative merits with inversion data coming from satellites. We show a good match among the various estimates in terms of overall trends at a regional level and on a decadal basis, but large differences exist even among similar data types, which is a limit to the possibility of verification of country-reported data.
Matthew J. McGrath, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Philippe Peylin, Robbie M. Andrew, Bradley Matthews, Frank Dentener, Juraj Balkovič, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Gregoire Broquet, Philippe Ciais, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Giacomo Grassi, Ian Harris, Matthew Jones, Jürgen Knauer, Matthias Kuhnert, Guillaume Monteil, Saqr Munassar, Paul I. Palmer, Glen P. Peters, Chunjing Qiu, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Oksana Tarasova, Matteo Vizzarri, Karina Winkler, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Antoine Berchet, Peter Briggs, Patrick Brockmann, Frédéric Chevallier, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Sara Filipek, Pierre Friedlingstein, Richard Fuchs, Michael Gauss, Christoph Gerbig, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Richard A. Houghton, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ronny Lauerwald, Bas Lerink, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Géraud Moulas, Marilena Muntean, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Aurélie Paquirissamy, Lucia Perugini, Wouter Peters, Roberto Pilli, Julia Pongratz, Pierre Regnier, Marko Scholze, Yusuf Serengil, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Rona L. Thompson, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, and Sophia Walther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4295–4370, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimation of fluxes of carbon dioxide from the land surface is essential for understanding future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate system. A wide variety of methods currently exist to estimate these sources and sinks. We are continuing work to develop annual comparisons of these diverse methods in order to clarify what they all actually calculate and to resolve apparent disagreement, in addition to highlighting opportunities for increased understanding.
Peter Hoffmann, Vanessa Reinhart, Diana Rechid, Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré, Edouard L. Davin, Christina Asmus, Benjamin Bechtel, Jürgen Böhner, Eleni Katragkou, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3819–3852, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the new high-resolution land use and land cover change dataset LUCAS LUC for Europe (version 1.1), tailored for use in regional climate models. Historical and projected future land use change information from the Land-Use Harmonization 2 (LUH2) dataset is translated into annual plant functional type changes from 1950 to 2015 and 2016 to 2100, respectively, by employing a newly developed land use translator.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Almut Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, Fortunat Joos, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Stephen Sitch, Michael O'Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen (N) is an essential limiting nutrient to terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration. We evaluate N cycling in an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. We find that variability in N processes across models is large. Models tended to overestimate C storage per unit N in vegetation and soil, which could have consequences for projecting the future terrestrial C sink. However, N cycling measurements are highly uncertain, and more are necessary to guide the development of N cycling in models.
Kandice L. Harper, Céline Lamarche, Andrew Hartley, Philippe Peylin, Catherine Ottlé, Vladislav Bastrikov, Rodrigo San Martín, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Grit Kirches, Martin Boettcher, Roman Shevchuk, Carsten Brockmann, and Pierre Defourny
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1465–1499, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We built a spatially explicit annual plant-functional-type (PFT) dataset for 1992–2020 exhibiting intra-class spatial variability in PFT fractional cover at 300 m. For each year, 14 maps of percentage cover are produced: bare soil, water, permanent snow/ice, built, managed grasses, natural grasses, and trees and shrubs, each split into leaf type and seasonality. Model simulations indicate significant differences in simulated carbon, water, and energy fluxes in some regions using this new set.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Dominik Brunner, Matthias Kuhnert, Bradley Matthews, Paul I. Palmer, Oksana Tarasova, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wilfried Winiwarter, Giuseppe Etiope, Tuula Aalto, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Vladislav Bastrikov, Antoine Berchet, Patrick Brockmann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Frank Dentener, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Massaer Kouyate, Adrian Leip, Antti Leppänen, Emanuele Lugato, Manon Maisonnier, Alistair J. Manning, Tiina Markkanen, Joe McNorton, Marilena Muntean, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Prabir K. Patra, Lucia Perugini, Isabelle Pison, Maarit T. Raivonen, Marielle Saunois, Arjo J. Segers, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Hanqin Tian, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, Guido R. van der Werf, Chris Wilson, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1197–1268, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the state-of-the-art scientific overview of CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK in Petrescu et al. (2021a). Yearly updates are needed to improve the different respective approaches and to inform on the development of formal verification systems. It integrates the most recent emission inventories, process-based model and regional/global inversions, comparing them with UNFCCC national GHG inventories, in support to policy to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Giacomo Grassi, Clemens Schwingshackl, Thomas Gasser, Richard A. Houghton, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Alessandro Cescatti, Philippe Ciais, Sandro Federici, Pierre Friedlingstein, Werner A. Kurz, Maria J. Sanz Sanchez, Raúl Abad Viñas, Ramdane Alkama, Selma Bultan, Guido Ceccherini, Stefanie Falk, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Anu Korosuo, Joana Melo, Matthew J. McGrath, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Benjamin Poulter, Anna A. Romanovskaya, Simone Rossi, Hanqin Tian, Anthony P. Walker, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1093–1114, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Striking differences exist in estimates of land-use CO2 fluxes between the national greenhouse gas inventories and the IPCC assessment reports. These differences hamper an accurate assessment of the collective progress under the Paris Agreement. By implementing an approach that conceptually reconciles land-use CO2 flux from national inventories and the global models used by the IPCC, our study is an important step forward for increasing confidence in land-use CO2 flux estimates.
Maureen Beaudor, Nicolas Vuichard, Juliette Lathière, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Didier Hauglustaine
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1053–1081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia mainly comes from the agricultural sector, and its volatilization relies on environmental variables. Our approach aims at benefiting from an Earth system model framework to estimate it. By doing so, we represent a consistent spatial distribution of the emissions' response to environmental changes.
We greatly improved the seasonal cycle of emissions compared with previous work. In addition, our model includes natural soil emissions (that are rarely represented in modeling approaches).
Yi-Ying Chen and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Biogeosciences, 20, 349–363, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-349-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-349-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical cyclones are typically assumed to be associated with ecosystem damage. This study challenges this assumption and suggests that instead of reducing leaf area, cyclones in East Asia may increase leaf area by alleviating water stress.
Huanhuan Wang, Chao Yue, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Biogeosciences, 20, 75–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study provided a synthesis of three influential methods to quantify afforestation impact on surface temperature. Results showed that actual effect following afforestation was highly dependent on afforestation fraction. When full afforestation is assumed, the actual effect approaches the potential effect. We provided evidence the afforestation faction is a key factor in reconciling different methods and emphasized that it should be considered for surface cooling impacts in policy evaluation.
Yuan Zhang, Devaraju Narayanappa, Philippe Ciais, Wei Li, Daniel Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Martin G. De Kauwe, Laurent Li, and Fabienne Maignan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9111–9125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There are a few studies to examine if current models correctly represented the complex processes of transpiration. Here, we use a coefficient Ω, which indicates if transpiration is mainly controlled by vegetation processes or by turbulence, to evaluate the ORCHIDEE model. We found a good performance of ORCHIDEE, but due to compensation of biases in different processes, we also identified how different factors control Ω and where the model is wrong. Our method is generic to evaluate other models.
Jörg Franke, Michael N. Evans, Andrew Schurer, and Gabriele C. Hegerl
Clim. Past, 18, 2583–2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-2583-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-2583-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Detection and attribution is a statistical method to evaluate if external factors or random variability have caused climatic changes. We use for the first time a comparison of simulated and observed tree-ring width that circumvents many limitations of previous studies relying on climate reconstructions. We attribute variability in temperature-limited trees to strong volcanic eruptions and for the first time detect a spatial pattern in the growth of moisture-sensitive trees after eruptions.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Yitong Yao, Emilie Joetzjer, Philippe Ciais, Nicolas Viovy, Fabio Cresto Aleina, Jerome Chave, Lawren Sack, Megan Bartlett, Patrick Meir, Rosie Fisher, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7809–7833, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7809-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7809-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To facilitate more mechanistic modeling of drought effects on forest dynamics, our study implements a hydraulic module to simulate the vertical water flow, change in water storage and percentage loss of stem conductance (PLC). With the relationship between PLC and tree mortality, our model can successfully reproduce the large biomass drop observed under throughfall exclusion. Our hydraulic module provides promising avenues benefiting the prediction for mortality under future drought events.
Arthur Nicolaus Fendrich, Philippe Ciais, Emanuele Lugato, Marco Carozzi, Bertrand Guenet, Pasquale Borrelli, Victoria Naipal, Matthew McGrath, Philippe Martin, and Panos Panagos
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7835–7857, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7835-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7835-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Currently, spatially explicit models for soil carbon stock can simulate the impacts of several changes. However, they do not incorporate the erosion, lateral transport, and deposition (ETD) of soil material. The present work developed ETD formulation, illustrated model calibration and validation for Europe, and presented the results for a depositional site. We expect that our work advances ETD models' description and facilitates their reproduction and incorporation in land surface models.
Camille Abadie, Fabienne Maignan, Marine Remaud, Jérôme Ogée, J. Elliott Campbell, Mary E. Whelan, Florian Kitz, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Richard Wehr, Wu Sun, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Didier Hauglustaine, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Sauveur Belviso, David Montagne, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W. Jones, Michael O'Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Rob B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Laurent Bopp, Thi Tuyet Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Kim I. Currie, Bertrand Decharme, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Thomas Gasser, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Atul Jain, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Sebastian Lienert, Junjie Liu, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Clemens Schwingshackl, Roland Séférian, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Chisato Wada, Rik Wanninkhof, Andrew J. Watson, David Willis, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1917–2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2021 describes the data sets and methodology used to quantify the emissions of carbon dioxide and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. These living data are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Ruqi Yang, Jun Wang, Ning Zeng, Stephen Sitch, Wenhan Tang, Matthew Joseph McGrath, Qixiang Cai, Di Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Hanqin Tian, Atul K. Jain, and Pengfei Han
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 833–849, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-833-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-833-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We comprehensively investigate historical GPP trends based on five kinds of GPP datasets and analyze the causes for any discrepancies among them. Results show contrasting behaviors between modeled and satellite-based GPP trends, and their inconsistencies are likely caused by the contrasting performance between satellite-derived and modeled leaf area index (LAI). Thus, the uncertainty in satellite-based GPP induced by LAI undermines its role in assessing the performance of DGVM simulations.
Irina Melnikova, Olivier Boucher, Patricia Cadule, Katsumasa Tanaka, Thomas Gasser, Tomohiro Hajima, Yann Quilcaille, Hideo Shiogama, Roland Séférian, Kaoru Tachiiri, Nicolas Vuichard, Tokuta Yokohata, and Philippe Ciais
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 779–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The deployment of bioenergy crops for capturing carbon from the atmosphere facilitates global warming mitigation via generating negative CO2 emissions. Here, we explored the consequences of large-scale energy crops deployment on the land carbon cycle. The land-use change for energy crops leads to carbon emissions and loss of future potential increase in carbon uptake by natural ecosystems. This impact should be taken into account by the modeling teams and accounted for in mitigation policies.
Elodie Salmon, Fabrice Jégou, Bertrand Guenet, Line Jourdain, Chunjing Qiu, Vladislav Bastrikov, Christophe Guimbaud, Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Peylin, Sébastien Gogo, Fatima Laggoun-Défarge, Mika Aurela, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Jiquan Chen, Bogdan H. Chojnicki, Housen Chu, Colin W. Edgar, Eugenie S. Euskirchen, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Krzysztof Fortuniak, David Holl, Janina Klatt, Olaf Kolle, Natalia Kowalska, Lars Kutzbach, Annalea Lohila, Lutz Merbold, Włodzimierz Pawlak, Torsten Sachs, and Klaudia Ziemblińska
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2813–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A methane model that features methane production and transport by plants, the ebullition process and diffusion in soil, oxidation to CO2, and CH4 fluxes to the atmosphere has been embedded in the ORCHIDEE-PEAT land surface model, which includes an explicit representation of northern peatlands. This model, ORCHIDEE-PCH4, was calibrated and evaluated on 14 peatland sites. Results show that the model is sensitive to temperature and substrate availability over the top 75 cm of soil depth.
Guillaume Marie, B. Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Cecile Dardel, Thuy Le Toan, Alexandre Bouvet, Stéphane Mermoz, Ludovic Villard, Vladislav Bastrikov, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2599–2617, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2599-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2599-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most Earth system models make use of vegetation maps to initialize a simulation at global scale. Satellite-based biomass map estimates for Africa were used to estimate cover fractions for the 15 land cover classes. This study successfully demonstrates that satellite-based biomass maps can be used to better constrain vegetation maps. Applying this approach at the global scale would increase confidence in assessments of present-day biomass stocks.
Yohanna Villalobos, Peter J. Rayner, Jeremy D. Silver, Steven Thomas, Vanessa Haverd, Jürgen Knauer, Zoë M. Loh, Nicholas M. Deutscher, David W. T. Griffith, and David F. Pollard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17453–17494, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Semi-arid ecosystems such as those in Australia are evolving and might play an essential role in the future of climate change. We use carbon dioxide concentrations derived from the OCO-2 satellite instrument and a regional transport model to understand if Australia was a carbon sink or source of CO2 in 2015. Our research's main findings suggest that Australia acted as a carbon sink of about −0.41 ± 0.08 petagrams of carbon in 2015, driven primarily by savanna and sparsely vegetated ecosystems.
Julia Bres, Pierre Sepulchre, Nicolas Viovy, and Nicolas Vuichard
Biogeosciences, 18, 5729–5750, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5729-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5729-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We emulate angiosperm paleo-traits in a land surface model according to the fossil record, and we assess this paleovegetation functioning under different pCO2 from the leaf scale to the global scale. We show that photosynthesis, transpiration and water-use efficiency are dependent on both the vegetation parameterization and the pCO2. Comparing the modeled vegetation with the fossil record, we provide clues on how to account for angiosperm evolutionary traits in paleoclimate simulations.
Alexander J. Winkler, Ranga B. Myneni, Alexis Hannart, Stephen Sitch, Vanessa Haverd, Danica Lombardozzi, Vivek K. Arora, Julia Pongratz, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Daniel S. Goll, Etsushi Kato, Hanqin Tian, Almut Arneth, Pierre Friedlingstein, Atul K. Jain, Sönke Zaehle, and Victor Brovkin
Biogeosciences, 18, 4985–5010, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4985-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4985-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite observations since the early 1980s show that Earth's greening trend is slowing down and that browning clusters have been emerging, especially in the last 2 decades. A collection of model simulations in conjunction with causal theory points at climatic changes as a key driver of vegetation changes in natural ecosystems. Most models underestimate the observed vegetation browning, especially in tropical rainforests, which could be due to an excessive CO2 fertilization effect in models.
Peter Hoffmann, Vanessa Reinhart, Diana Rechid, Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré, Edouard L. Davin, Christina Asmus, Benjamin Bechtel, Jürgen Böhner, Eleni Katragkou, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-252, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-252, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the new high-resolution land-use land-cover change dataset LUCAS LUC historical and future land use and land cover change dataset (Version 1.0), tailored for use in regional climate models. Historical and projected future land use change information from the Land-Use Harmonization 2 (LUH2) dataset is translated into annual plant functional type changes from 1950 to 2015 and 2016 to 2100, respectively, by employing a newly developed land use translator.
Thomas Janssen, Ype van der Velde, Florian Hofhansl, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Kim Naudts, Bart Driessen, Katrin Fleischer, and Han Dolman
Biogeosciences, 18, 4445–4472, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4445-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4445-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite images show that the Amazon forest has greened up during past droughts. Measurements of tree stem growth and leaf litterfall upscaled using machine-learning algorithms show that leaf flushing at the onset of a drought results in canopy rejuvenation and green-up during drought while simultaneously trees excessively shed older leaves and tree stem growth declines. Canopy green-up during drought therefore does not necessarily point to enhanced tree growth and improved forest health.
Jonathan Barichivich, Philippe Peylin, Thomas Launois, Valerie Daux, Camille Risi, Jina Jeong, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Biogeosciences, 18, 3781–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The width and the chemical signals of tree rings have the potential to test and improve the physiological responses simulated by global land surface models, which are at the core of future climate projections. Here, we demonstrate the novel use of tree-ring width and carbon and oxygen stable isotopes to evaluate the representation of tree growth and physiology in a global land surface model at temporal scales beyond experimentation and direct observation.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Philippe Peylin, Matthew J. McGrath, Efisio Solazzo, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Francesco N. Tubiello, Peter Bergamaschi, Dominik Brunner, Glen P. Peters, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Aki Tsuruta, Wilfried Winiwarter, Prabir K. Patra, Matthias Kuhnert, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Monica Crippa, Marielle Saunois, Lucia Perugini, Tiina Markkanen, Tuula Aalto, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Hanqin Tian, Yuanzhi Yao, Chris Wilson, Giulia Conchedda, Dirk Günther, Adrian Leip, Pete Smith, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Antti Leppänen, Alistair J. Manning, Joe McNorton, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2307–2362, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with process-based model data and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling them with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Matthew J. McGrath, Robbie M. Andrew, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Gregoire Broquet, Francesco N. Tubiello, Christoph Gerbig, Julia Pongratz, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Giacomo Grassi, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, Matthias Kuhnert, Juraj Balkovič, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Hugo A. C. Denier van der
Gon, Efisio Solazzo, Chunjing Qiu, Roberto Pilli, Igor B. Konovalov, Richard A. Houghton, Dirk Günther, Lucia Perugini, Monica Crippa, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Pete Smith, Saqr Munassar, Rona L. Thompson, Giulia Conchedda, Guillaume Monteil, Marko Scholze, Ute Karstens, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2363–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CO2 fossil emissions and CO2 land fluxes in the EU27+UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with ecosystem data, land carbon models and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling CO2 estimates with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and facilitating real-time verification procedures.
Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Tammas Loughran, Kerstin Hartung, Ana Bastos, Felix Havermann, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Daniel S. Goll, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Benjamin Poulter, Stephen Sitch, Michael O. Sullivan, Hanqin Tian, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Soenke Zaehle, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 635–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-635-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-635-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We provide the first spatio-temporally explicit comparison of different model-derived fluxes from land use and land cover changes (fLULCCs) by using the TRENDY v8 dynamic global vegetation models used in the 2019 global carbon budget. We find huge regional fLULCC differences resulting from environmental assumptions, simulated periods, and the timing of land use and land cover changes, and we argue for a method consistent across time and space and for carefully choosing the accounting period.
Fabienne Maignan, Camille Abadie, Marine Remaud, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Róisín Commane, Richard Wehr, J. Elliott Campbell, Sauveur Belviso, Stephen A. Montzka, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Yoichi P. Shiga, Nicolas Vuichard, Mary E. Whelan, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 18, 2917–2955, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a proxy for gross primary production (GPP). Using a land surface and a transport model, we compare a mechanistic representation of the plant COS uptake (Berry et al., 2013) to the classical leaf relative uptake (LRU) approach linking GPP and vegetation COS fluxes. We show that at high temporal resolutions a mechanistic approach is mandatory, but at large scales the LRU approach compares similarly.
Zichong Chen, Junjie Liu, Daven K. Henze, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Kelley C. Wells, Stephen Sitch, Pierre Friedlingstein, Emilie Joetzjer, Vladislav Bastrikov, Daniel S. Goll, Vanessa Haverd, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Sebastian Lienert, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Benjamin Poulter, Hanqin Tian, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, and Scot M. Miller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6663–6680, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6663-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6663-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite observes atmospheric CO2 globally. We use a multiple regression and inverse model to quantify the relationships between OCO-2 and environmental drivers within individual years for 2015–2018 and within seven global biomes. Our results point to limitations of current space-based observations for inferring environmental relationships but also indicate the potential to inform key relationships that are very uncertain in process-based models.
Hiroki Mizuochi, Agnès Ducharne, Frédérique Cheruy, Josefine Ghattas, Amen Al-Yaari, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Vladislav Bastrikov, Philippe Peylin, Fabienne Maignan, and Nicolas Vuichard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2199–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021, 2021
Daniele Peano, Deborah Hemming, Stefano Materia, Christine Delire, Yuanchao Fan, Emilie Joetzjer, Hanna Lee, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Taejin Park, Philippe Peylin, David Wårlind, Andy Wiltshire, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 18, 2405–2428, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Global climate models are the scientist’s tools used for studying past, present, and future climate conditions. This work examines the ability of a group of our tools in reproducing and capturing the right timing and length of the season when plants show their green leaves. This season, indeed, is fundamental for CO2 exchanges between land, atmosphere, and climate. This work shows that discrepancies compared to observations remain, demanding further polishing of these tools.
Richard Essery, Hyungjun Kim, Libo Wang, Paul Bartlett, Aaron Boone, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Eleanor Burke, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Yeugeniy Gusev, Stefan Hagemann, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Gerhard Krinner, Matthieu Lafaysse, Yves Lejeune, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Christoph Marty, Cecile B. Menard, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, John Pomeroy, Gerd Schädler, Vladimir Semenov, Tatiana Smirnova, Sean Swenson, Dmitry Turkov, Nander Wever, and Hua Yuan
The Cryosphere, 14, 4687–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are uncertain in predicting how warming changes snow cover. This paper compares 22 snow models with the same meteorological inputs. Predicted trends agree with observations at four snow research sites: winter snow cover does not start later, but snow now melts earlier in spring than in the 1980s at two of the sites. Cold regions where snow can last until late summer are predicted to be particularly sensitive to warming because the snow then melts faster at warmer times of year.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Corinne Le Quéré, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone Alin, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Selma Bultan, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Wiley Evans, Liesbeth Florentie, Piers M. Forster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Ian Harris, Kerstin Hartung, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Emilie Joetzjer, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Vassilis Kitidis, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Zhu Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Metzl, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Adam J. P. Smith, Adrienne J. Sutton, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Guido van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Andrew J. Watson, David Willis, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3269–3340, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2020 describes the data sets and methodology used to quantify the emissions of carbon dioxide and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. These living data are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Lena R. Boysen, Victor Brovkin, Julia Pongratz, David M. Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Nicolas Vuichard, Philippe Peylin, Spencer Liddicoat, Tomohiro Hajima, Yanwu Zhang, Matthias Rocher, Christine Delire, Roland Séférian, Vivek K. Arora, Lars Nieradzik, Peter Anthoni, Wim Thiery, Marysa M. Laguë, Deborah Lawrence, and Min-Hui Lo
Biogeosciences, 17, 5615–5638, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5615-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5615-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We find a biogeophysically induced global cooling with strong carbon losses in a 20 million square kilometre idealized deforestation experiment performed by nine CMIP6 Earth system models. It takes many decades for the temperature signal to emerge, with non-local effects playing an important role. Despite a consistent experimental setup, models diverge substantially in their climate responses. This study offers unprecedented insights for understanding land use change effects in CMIP6 models.
Natasha MacBean, Russell L. Scott, Joel A. Biederman, Catherine Ottlé, Nicolas Vuichard, Agnès Ducharne, Thomas Kolb, Sabina Dore, Marcy Litvak, and David J. P. Moore
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5203–5230, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5203-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5203-2020, 2020
Yuan Zhang, Ana Bastos, Fabienne Maignan, Daniel Goll, Olivier Boucher, Laurent Li, Alessandro Cescatti, Nicolas Vuichard, Xiuzhi Chen, Christof Ammann, M. Altaf Arain, T. Andrew Black, Bogdan Chojnicki, Tomomichi Kato, Ivan Mammarella, Leonardo Montagnani, Olivier Roupsard, Maria J. Sanz, Lukas Siebicke, Marek Urbaniak, Francesco Primo Vaccari, Georg Wohlfahrt, Will Woodgate, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5401–5423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5401-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5401-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We improved the ORCHIDEE LSM by distinguishing diffuse and direct light in canopy and evaluated the new model with observations from 159 sites. Compared with the old model, the new model has better sunny GPP and reproduced the diffuse light fertilization effect observed at flux sites. Our simulations also indicate different mechanisms causing the observed GPP enhancement under cloudy conditions at different times. The new model has the potential to study large-scale impacts of aerosol changes.
Guillaume Monteil, Grégoire Broquet, Marko Scholze, Matthew Lang, Ute Karstens, Christoph Gerbig, Frank-Thomas Koch, Naomi E. Smith, Rona L. Thompson, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Emily White, Antoon Meesters, Philippe Ciais, Anita L. Ganesan, Alistair Manning, Michael Mischurow, Wouter Peters, Philippe Peylin, Jerôme Tarniewicz, Matt Rigby, Christian Rödenbeck, Alex Vermeulen, and Evie M. Walton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12063–12091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12063-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12063-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents the first results from the EUROCOM project, a regional atmospheric inversion intercomparison exercise involving six European research groups. It aims to produce an estimate of the net carbon flux between the European terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere for the period 2006–2015, based on constraints provided by observed CO2 concentrations and using inverse modelling techniques. The use of six different models enables us to investigate the robustness of the results.
Cited articles
Alexander, M. R., Rollinson, C. R., Babst, F., Trouet, V., and Moore, D. J. P.: Relative influences of multiple sources of uncertainty on cumulative and incremental tree-ring-derived aboveground biomass estimates, Trees, 32,
265–276, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1629-0, 2018. a
Amthor, J. S.: The McCree–de Wit–Penning de Vries–Thornley Respiration
Paradigms: 30 Years Later, Ann. Botany, 86, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1175, 2000. a
Archambault, S. and Bergeron, Y.: Lac Duparquet – THOC – ITRDB CANA106 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/rmbz-ga96, 2002. a
Babst, F., Alexander, M. R., Szejner, P., Bouriaud, O., Klesse, S., Roden, J., Ciais, P., Poulter, B., Frank, D., Moore, D. J., and Trouet, V.: A tree-ring perspective on the terrestrial carbon cycle, Oecologia, 176, 307–322, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3031-6, 2014a. a, b, c
Babst, F., Bouriaud, O., Alexander, R., Trouet, V., and Frank, D.: Toward
consistent measurements of carbon accumulation: A multi-site assessment of
biomass and basal area increment across Europe, Dendrochronologia, 32,
153–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2014.01.002, 2014b. a, b
Babst, F., Poulter, B., Bodesheim, P., Mahecha, M. D., and Frank, D. C.:
Improved tree-ring archives will support earth-system science, Nat. Ecol.
Evol., 1, 0008, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0008, 2017. a
Babst, F., Bodesheim, P., Charney, N., Friend, A. D., Girardin, M. P., Klesse, S., Moore, D. J. P., Seftigen, K., Björklund, J., and Bouriaud, O.: When tree rings go global: challenges and opportunities for retro-and
prospective insight, Quatern. Sci. Rev., 197, 1–20, 2018. a
Bakker, J. D.: A new, proportional method for reconstructing historical tree
diameters, Can. J. Forest Res., 35, 2515–2520,
https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-136, 2005. a
Barichivich, J., Peylin, P., Launois, T., Daux, V., Risi, C., Jeong, J., and Luyssaert, S.: A triple tree-ring constraint for tree growth and physiology in a global land surface model, Biogeosciences, 18, 3781–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, 2021. a
Bell, R., Magre, F., and Senter, D.: Jefferson County Missouri – JUVI – ITRDB MO009 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/d4mc-nh83, 2002. a
Bellassen, V., Le Maire, G., Dhôte, J., Ciais, P., and Viovy, N.:
Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model – Part 1: Model
structure and general behaviour, Ecol. Model., 221, 2458–2474,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.008, 2010. a, b
Blyth, E., Gash, J., Lloyd, A., Pryor, M., Weedon, G. P., and Shuttleworth, J.: Evaluating the JULES Land Surface Model Energy Fluxes Using FLUXNET Data, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 509–519, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1183.1, 2010. a
Bonan, G. B., Williams, M., Fisher, R. A., and Oleson, K. W.: Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system: linking leaf water-use efficiency and water transport along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2193–2222, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2193-2014, 2014. a
Bowman, D. M., Brienen, R. J., Gloor, E., Phillips, O. L., and Prior, L. D.:
Detecting trends in tree growth: not so simple, Trends Plant Sci.,
18, 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.005, 2013. a, b
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M.,
Cochrane, M. A., D'Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison,
S. P., Johnston, F. H., Keeley, J. E., Krawchuk, M. A., Kull, C. A., Marston,
J. B., Moritz, M. A., Prentice, I. C., Roos, C. I., Scott, A. C., Swetnam,
T. W., van der Werf, G. R., and Pyne, S. J.: Fire in the Earth System,
Science, 324, 481–484, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886, 2009. a
Bräuning, A., De Ridder, M., Zafirov, N., García-González, I., Petrov Dimitrov, D., and Gärtner, H.: Tree-Ring Features: Indicators Of Extreme Event Impacts, IAWA Journal, 37, 206–231, https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-20160131, 2016. a
Brienen, R. J. W., Gloor, E., and Zuidema, P. A.: Detecting evidence for CO2 fertilization from tree ring studies: The potential role of sampling biases, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB1025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004143, 2012. a, b
Brienen, R. J. W., Gloor, M., and Ziv, G.: Tree demography dominates
long‐term growth trends inferred from tree rings, Glob. Change Biol.,
23, 474–484, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13410, 2017. a
Briffa, K. and Schweingruber, F.: Cascade Radar St. Payette – PCEN – ITRDB
ID007 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/6pcv-me64, 2002. a
Briffa, K. R. and Melvin, T. M.: A Closer Look at Regional Curve
Standardization of Tree-Ring Records: Justification of the Need, a Warning of
Some Pitfalls, and Suggested Improvements in Its Application,
Dendroclimatology, 11, 113–145, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5725-0_5, 2011. a, b, c, d, e
Briffa, K. R., Osborn, T. J., and Schweingruber, F. H.: Large-scale
temperature inferences from tree rings: a review, Global Planet.
Change, 40, 11–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00095-X,
2004. a
Briongos, J. and Cerro-Barja, A.: La Camarilla el Provencio Cuenca Undisturbed – PIPN – ITRDB SPAI055 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/p9h0-g517, 2007. a
Bunde, A., Büntgen, U., Ludescher, J., Luterbacher, J., and von Storch,
H.: Is there memory in precipitation?, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 174–175,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1830, 2013. a
Campbell, J. E., Berry, J. A., Seibt, U., Smith, S. J., Montzka, S. A.,
Launois, T., Belviso, S., Bopp, L., and Laine, M.: Large historical growth
in global terrestrial gross primary production, Nature, 544, 84–87,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22030, 2017. a
Cao, X., Tian, F., Li, F., Gaillard, M.-J., Rudaya, N., Xu, Q., and Herzschuh, U.: Pollen-based quantitative land-cover reconstruction for northern Asia covering the last 40 ka cal BP, Clim. Past, 15, 1503–1536, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1503-2019, 2019. a
Cedro, A.: Growth-climate relationships of wild service trees on the
easternmost range boundary in Poland, STR16/04, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, p. 24,
https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-16042, 2016. a
Chen, Y., Yang, K., He, J., Qin, J., Shi, J., Du, J., and He, Q.: Improving
land surface temperature modeling for dry land of China, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015921, 2011. a
Chen, Y., Ryder, J., Bastrikov, V., McGrath, M. J., Naudts, K., Otto, J., Ottlé, C., Peylin, P., Polcher, J., Valade, A., Black, A., Elbers, J. A., Moors, E., Foken, T., van Gorsel, E., Haverd, V., Heinesch, B., Tiedemann, F., Knohl, A., Launiainen, S., Loustau, D., Ogée, J., Vessala, T., and Luyssaert, S.: Evaluating the performance of land surface model ORCHIDEE-CAN v1.0 on water and energy flux estimation with a single- and multi-layer energy budget scheme, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2951–2972, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2951-2016, 2016. a
Chen, Y.-Y., Gardiner, B., Pasztor, F., Blennow, K., Ryder, J., Valade, A., Naudts, K., Otto, J., McGrath, M. J., Planque, C., and Luyssaert, S.: Simulating damage for wind storms in the land surface model ORCHIDEE-CAN (revision 4262), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 771–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-771-2018, 2018. a
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman,
P. Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri,
M., Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L.,
Woodruff, S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis
Project, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 1–28,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776, 2011. a
Cook, E. R.: A time series analysis approach to tree ring standardization, PhD Thesis, 1985. a
Cook, E. R. and Kairiukstis, L. A.: Methods of Dendrochronology, Springer
Netherlands, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7879-0, 1990. a, b, c, d
Cook, E. R., Briffa, K. R., Meko, D. M., Graybill, D. A., and Funkhouser, G.:
The “segment length curse” in long tree-ring chronology development for
palaeoclimatic studies, The Holocene, 5, 229–237,
https://doi.org/10.1177/095968369500500211, 1995. a, b
D'Arrigo, R., Wilson, R., Liepert, B., and Cherubini, P.: On the “Divergence
Problem” in Northern Forests: A review of the tree-ring evidence and possible causes, Global Planet. Change, 60, 289–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.03.004, 2008. a
Davi, N., D'Arrigo, R., Jacoby, G. C., Buckley, B., and Kobayashi, O.:
Shiretoko – PCGN – ITRDB JAPA011 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/wnc6-1r75, 2011. a
De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C.,
Hickler, T., Jain, A. K., Luo, Y., Parton, W. J., Prentice, I. C., Smith, B.,
Thornton, P. E., Wang, S., Wang, Y.-P., Wårlind, D., Weng, E., Crous,
K. Y., Ellsworth, D. S., Hanson, P. J., Seok Kim, H., Warren, J. M., Oren,
R., and Norby, R. J.: Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated
CO2: a model-data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE
sites, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 1759–1779, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12164, 2013. a
De Schepper, V. and Steppe, K.: Development and verification of a water and sugar transport model using measured stem diameter variations, J. Exp. Bot., 61, 2083–2099, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq018, 2010. a
Deleuze, C. and Houllier, F.: Simple process-based xylem growth model for
describing wood microdensitometric profiles, J. Theor. Biol.,
193, 99–113, https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1998.0689, 1998. a
Deleuze, C., Pain, O., Dhôte, J.-F., and Hervé, J.-C.: A flexible radial increment model for individual trees in pure even-aged stands, Ann. Forest Sci., 61, 327–335, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004026, 2004. a
Demarty, J., Chevallier, F., Friend, A. D., Viovy, N., Piao, S., and Ciais, P.: Assimilation of global MODIS leaf area index retrievals within a terrestrial biosphere model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L15402,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030014, 2007. a
Drew, D. M., Downes, G. M., and Battaglia, M.: CAMBIUM, a process-based model of daily xylem development in Eucalyptus, J. Theor. Biol.,
264, 395–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.013, 2010. a
Ducoudré, N. I., Laval, K., and Perrier, A.: SECHIBA, a New Set of
Parameterizations of the Hydrologic Exchanges at the Land-Atmosphere
Interface within the LMD Atmospheric General Circulation Model, J.
Climate, 6, 248–273, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0248:SANSOP>2.0.CO;2,
1993. a
Dufrêne, E., Davi, H., François, C., Le Maire, G., Le Dantec,
V., and Granier, A.: Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest.
Part I: Model description and uncertainty analysis on modelled NEE,
Ecol. Model., 185, 407–436, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.004,
2005. a
Eyring, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Hess, P., Arfeuille, F., Bowman, K., Chipperfiel, M. P., Duncan, B., Fiore, A., Gettelman, A., and Giorgetta, M. A.: Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) community simulations in support of upcoming ozone and climate assessments, SPARC newsletter, 40, 48–66, 2013. a
Farquhar, G. D.: Models of Integrated Photosynthesis of Cells and Leaves,
Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 323,
357–367, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1989.0016, 1989. a
Fisher, R. A., Muszala, S., Verteinstein, M., Lawrence, P., Xu, C., McDowell, N. G., Knox, R. G., Koven, C., Holm, J., Rogers, B. M., Spessa, A., Lawrence, D., and Bonan, G.: Taking off the training wheels: the properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes, CLM4.5(ED), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3593–3619, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3593-2015, 2015. a
Franklin, O., Johansson, J., Dewar, R. C., Dieckmann, U., McMurtrie, R. E.,
Brännström, Å., and Dybzinski, R.: Modeling carbon
allocation in trees: a search for principles, Tree Physiol., 32, 648–666,
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr138, 2012. a
Friedlingstein, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., Bloh, W. V., Brovkin, V., Doney, S.,
Eby, M., Fung, I., Govindasamy, B., John, J., Jones, C., Joos, F., Kato, T.,
Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D., Raddatz, T., Rayner,
P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K. G., Schnurr, R., Strassmann, K.,
Thompson, S., J Weaver, A., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.: Climate –carbon
cycle feedback analysis, results from the C4MIP model intercomparison,
J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3800.1, 2006. a
Friedlingstein, P., Meinshausen, M., Arora, V. K., Jones, C. D., Anav, A.,
Liddicoat, S. K., and Knutti, R.: Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections
due to carbon cycle feedbacks, J. Climate, 27, 511–526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1, 2014. a
Friend, A. D., Eckes-Shephard, A. H., Fonti, P., Rademacher, T. T., Rathgeber, C. B., Richardson, A. D., and Turton, R. H.: On the need to consider wood formation processes in global vegetation models and a suggested approach, Ann. Forest Sci., 76, 49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0819-x, 2019. a
Fritts, H. C., Shashkin, A., and Downes, G. M.: A simulation model of conifer ring growth and cell structure, in: Tree-ring analysis: biological, methodological and environmental aspects, CABI publishing,Wallingford, UK,
3–32, 1999. a
Griggs, C., Kuniholm, P., and Petrucci, A.: Devecikonak Forest – QUSP – ITRDB TURK027 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/axza-3w94, 2006. a
Grissino-Mayer, H. D. and Fritts, H. C.: The International Tree-Ring Data
Bank: an enhanced global database serving the global scientific community,
The Holocene, 7, 235–238, https://doi.org/10.1177/095968369700700212, 1997. a
Haverd, V., Smith, B., Cook, G. D., Briggs, P. R., Nieradzik, L., Roxburgh,
S. H., Liedloff, A., Meyer, C. P., and Canadell, J. G.: A stand-alone tree
demography and landscape structure module for Earth system models,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5234–5239, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50972, 2013. a, b
Hayat, A., Hacket-Pain, A. J., Pretzsch, H., Rademacher, T. T., and Friend,
A. D.: Modeling Tree Growth Taking into Account Carbon Source and Sink
Limitations, Front. Plant Sci., 8, 182, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00182,
2017. a
Hemming, D., Fritts, H., Leavitt, S. W., Wright, W., Long, A., and Shashkin,
A.: Modelling tree-ring δ13C, Dendrochronologia, 19, 23–38, 2001. a
Hess, C., Niemeyer, T., Fichtner, A., Jansen, K., Kunz, M., Maneke, M., von
Wehrden, H., Quante, M., Walmsley, D., von Oheimb, G., and Härdtle, W.:
Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition alters growth responses of European beech
(Fagus sylvativa L.) to climate change, Environ. Pollut., 233,
92–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.024, 2018. a
Hirata, R., Hirano, T., Saigusa, N., Fujinuma, Y., Inukai, K., Kitamori, Y.,
Takahashi, Y., and Yamamoto, S.: Seasonal and interannual variations in
carbon dioxide exchange of a temperate larch forest, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 147, 110–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.07.005, 2007. a
Hölttä, T., Vesala, T., Sevanto, S., Perämäki, M., and Nikinmaa, E.: Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis, Trees, 20, 67–78,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0014-6, 2006. a
Hughes, M. K., Swetnam, T. W., and Diaz, H. F.: Dendroclimatology, vol. 11, in: Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research, Springer Netherlands,
Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5725-0, 2011. a, b
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and
New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2013. a
Jeong, J., Barichivich, J., Peylin, P., Haverd, V., McGrath, M. J., Vuichard, N., Evans, M. N., Babst, F., and Luyssaert, S.: Source codes for gmd-2020-29, Version 1.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4899742, 2021. a
Jiang, X., Huang, J.-G., Cheng, J., Dawson, A., Stadt, K. J., Comeau, P. G.,
and Chen, H. Y.: Interspecific variation in growth responses to tree size,
competition and climate of western Canadian boreal mixed forests, Sci. Total Environ., 631-632, 1070–1078, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.099, 2018. a
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo,
K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
77, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Keeling, C. D., Chin, J. F. S., and Whorf, T. P.: Increased activity of
northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements, Nature, 382, 146–149, https://doi.org/10.1038/382146a0, 1996. a
Klesse, S., Babst, F., Lienert, S., Spahni, R., Joos, F., Bouriaud, O., Carrer, M., Di Filippo, A., Poulter, B., Trotsiuk, V., Wilson, R., and Frank, D. C.: A Combined Tree Ring and Vegetation Model Assessment of European Forest Growth Sensitivity to Interannual Climate Variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1226–1240, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005856, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f
Kolus, H. R., Huntzinger, D. N., Schwalm, C. R., Fisher, J. B., McKay, N.,
Fang, Y., Michalak, A. M., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Poulter, B., Mao, J.,
Parazoo, N. C., and Shi, X.: Land carbon models underestimate the severity
and duration of drought's impact on plant productivity, Sci. Reports,
9, 2758, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1, 2019. a
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher, J., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., and Prentice, I. C.: A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB1015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199, 2005. a, b
Krusic, P. and Cook, E.: Above Gheri – ABSB – ITRDB NEPA003 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/xtp6-zh97, 2005. a
Laloyaux, P., de Boisseson, E., Balmaseda, M., Bidlot, J.-R., Broennimann, S., Buizza, R., Dalhgren, P., Dee, D., Haimberger, L., Hersbach, H., Kosaka, Y., Martin, M., Poli, P., Rayner, N., Rustemeier, E., and Schepers, D.: CERA-20C: A Coupled Reanalysis of the Twentieth Century, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1172–1195,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001273, 2018. a
LaMarche, V. C., Graybill, D. A., Fritts, H. C., and Rose, M. R.: Increasing
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Tree Ring Evidence for Growth Enhancement in
Natural Vegetation, Science, 225, 1019–1021,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.225.4666.1019, 1984. a
Leuzinger, S., Manusch, C., Bugmann, H., and Wolf, A.: A sink-limited growth
model improves biomass estimation along boreal and alpine tree lines, Global
Ecol. Biogeogr., 22, 924–932, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12047, 2013. a
Levesque, M., Andreu-Hayles, L., Smith, W. K., Williams, A. P., Hobi, M. L.,
Allred, B. W., and Pederson, N.: Tree-ring isotopes capture interannual
vegetation productivity dynamics at the biome scale, Nat. Commun.,
10, 742, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08634-y, 2019. a
Li, G., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., and Falster, D.: Simulation of tree-ring widths with a model for primary production, carbon allocation, and growth, Biogeosciences, 11, 6711–6724, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6711-2014, 2014. a, b
Lu, C. and Tian, H.: Global nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use for agriculture production in the past half century: shifted hot spots and nutrient imbalance, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 181–192, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-181-2017, 2017. a
Luo, Y. Q., Randerson, J. T., Abramowitz, G., Bacour, C., Blyth, E., Carvalhais, N., Ciais, P., Dalmonech, D., Fisher, J. B., Fisher, R., Friedlingstein, P., Hibbard, K., Hoffman, F., Huntzinger, D., Jones, C. D., Koven, C., Lawrence, D., Li, D. J., Mahecha, M., Niu, S. L., Norby, R., Piao, S. L., Qi, X., Peylin, P., Prentice, I. C., Riley, W., Reichstein, M., Schwalm, C., Wang, Y. P., Xia, J. Y., Zaehle, S., and Zhou, X. H.: A framework for benchmarking land models, Biogeosciences, 9, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3857-2012, 2012. a
Luyssaert, S.: ORCHIDEE_CN_CAN_r5698, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL) [code], https://doi.org/10.14768/20200228001.1, 2019. a
Magnani, F., Mencuccini, M., Borghetti, M., Berbigier, P., Berninger, F.,
Delzon, S., Grelle, A., Hari, P., Jarvis, P. G., Kolari, P., Kowalski, A. S.,
Lankreijer, H., Law, B. E., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Manca, G., Moncrieff,
J. B., Rayment, M., Tedeschi, V., Valentini, R., and Grace, J.: The human
footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests, Nature, 447,
849–851, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05847, 2007. a
McGuffie, A., K. and Henderson‐Sellers: Practical Climate Modelling, in: A
Climate Modelling Primer, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1002/0470857617.ch6, 2005. a
Melvin, T.: Historical growth rates and changing climatic sensitivity of
boreal conifers, PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 2004. a
Melvin, T.: Vytamoselka – PISY – ITRDB FINL055 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/kayq-q277, 2005. a
Mencuccini, M., Martínez-Vilalta, J., Vanderklein, D., Hamid, H. A.,
Korakaki, E., Lee, S., Michiels, B., Martínez‐Vilalta, J.,
Vanderklein, D., Hamid, H. A., Korakaki, E., Lee, S., and Michiels, B.:
Size‐mediated ageing reduces vigour in trees, Ecol. Lett., 8,
1183–1190, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00819.x, 2005. a
Merganičová, K., Merganič, J., Lehtonen, A., Vacchiano, G.,
Sever, M. Z. O., Augustynczik, A. L. D., Grote, R., Kyselová, I.,
Mäkelä, A., Yousefpour, R., Krejza, J., Collalti, A., and Reyer,
C. P. O.: Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change, Tree
Physiol., 39, 1937–1960, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz105, 2019. a
Meriläinen, J., Lindholm, M., Timonen, M., and Kolström, T.: Kukelo
Ahmovaara Juuka – PISY – ITRDB FINL052 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/jjxq-dh12, 2004. a
Misson, L.: MAIDEN: a model for analyzing ecosystem processes in
dendroecology, Can. J. Forest Res., 34, 874–887,
https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-252, 2004. a
Moorcroft, P. R., Hurtt, G. C., and Pacala, S. W.: A method for scaling
vegetation dynamics: The ecosystem demography model (ED), Ecol.
Monogr., 71, 557–586,
https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0557:AMFSVD]2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Nash, S. E.: Fundamentals of tree-ring research. James H. Speer.,
Geoarchaeology, 26, 453–455, https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20357, 2011. a
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB), Version: 7.22, NOAA [data set], available at:
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/paleoclimatology/tree-ring (last access: 15 September 2021), 2020. a
Naudts, K., Ryder, J., McGrath, M. J., Otto, J., Chen, Y., Valade, A., Bellasen, V., Berhongaray, G., Bönisch, G., Campioli, M., Ghattas, J., De Groote, T., Haverd, V., Kattge, J., MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Merilä, P., Penuelas, J., Peylin, P., Pinty, B., Pretzsch, H., Schulze, E. D., Solyga, D., Vuichard, N., Yan, Y., and Luyssaert, S.: A vertically discretised canopy description for ORCHIDEE (SVN r2290) and the modifications to the energy, water and carbon fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2035–2065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2035-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Babst, F., Klesse, S., Nötzli, M., Bouriaud, O.,
Neukom, R., Dobbertin, M., and Frank, D.: The influence of sampling design
on tree-ring-based quantification of forest growth, Glob. Change Biol.,
20, 2867–2885, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12599, 2014. a, b
Neuwirth, B., Schweingruber, F. H., and Winiger, M.: Spatial patterns of
central European pointer years from 1901 to 1971, Dendrochronologia,
24, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2006.05.004, 2007. a, b
Nicklen, E. F., Roland, C. A., Csank, A. Z., Wilmking, M., Ruess, R. W., and
Muldoon, L. A.: Stand basal area and solar radiation amplify white spruce
climate sensitivity in interior Alaska: Evidence from carbon isotopes and
tree rings, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 911–926, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14511,
2019. a
Nickless, A., Scholes, R. J., and Archibald, S.: A method for calculating the variance and confidence intervals for tree biomass estimates obtained from allometric equations, S. Afr. J. Sci., 107, 86–95,
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i5/6.356, 2011. a
Oliver, C. D. and Larson, B. C.: Forest stand dynamics, Wiley, New York, 1996. a
Ols, C., Girardin, M. P., Hofgaard, A., Bergeron, Y., and Drobyshev, I.:
Monitoring Climate Sensitivity Shifts in Tree-Rings of Eastern Boreal North
America Using Model-Data Comparison, Ecosystems, 21, 1042–1057,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0203-3, 2018. a
PAGES 2k Consortium, P.: Continental-scale temperature variability during the past
two millennia, Nat. Geosci., 6, 339–346, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1797,
2013. a
Panthi, S., Fan, Z.-X., van der Sleen, P., and Zuidema, P. A.: Long-term
physiological and growth responses of Himalayan fir to environmental change
are mediated by mean climate, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 1778–1794,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14910, 2020. a
Pappas, C., Maillet, J., Rakowski, S., Baltzer, J. L., Barr, A. G., Black,
T. A., Fatichi, S., Laroque, C. P., Matheny, A. M., Roy, A., Sonnentag, O.,
and Zha, T.: Aboveground tree growth is a minor and decoupled fraction of
boreal forest carbon input, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 290,
108030, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108030, 2020. a
Paris Agreements: Paris agreement, in: Report of the Conference of the
Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 21st
Session, 2015, Paris, HeinOnline, vol. 4, p. 2017, 2015. a
Peylin, P., Bacour, C., MacBean, N., Leonard, S., Rayner, P., Kuppel, S., Koffi, E., Kane, A., Maignan, F., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., and Prunet, P.: A new stepwise carbon cycle data assimilation system using multiple data streams to constrain the simulated land surface carbon cycle, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3321–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3321-2016, 2016. a
Rammig, A., Wiedermann, M., Donges, J. F., Babst, F., von Bloh, W., Frank, D., Thonicke, K., and Mahecha, M. D.: Coincidences of climate extremes and anomalous vegetation responses: comparing tree ring patterns to simulated productivity, Biogeosciences, 12, 373–385, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-373-2015, 2015. a, b
Randerson, J. T., Hoffman, F. M., Thorton, P. E., Mahowald, N. M., Lindsay, K., Lee, Y., Nevison, C. D., Doney, S. C., Bonan, G., Stöckli, R., Covey, C., Running, S. W., and Fung, I. Y.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01912.x, 2009. a
Rollinson, C. R., Liu, Y., Raiho, A., Moore, D. J. P., McLachlan, J., Bishop,
D. A., Dye, A., Matthes, J. H., Hessl, A., Hickler, T., Pederson, N.,
Poulter, B., Quaife, T., Schaefer, K., Steinkamp, J., and Dietze, M. C.:
Emergent climate and CO2 sensitivities of net primary productivity in
ecosystem models do not agree with empirical data in temperate forests of
eastern North America, Glob. Change Biol., 23, 2755–2767,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13626, 2017. a
Ryder, J., Polcher, J., Peylin, P., Ottlé, C., Chen, Y., van Gorsel, E., Haverd, V., McGrath, M. J., Naudts, K., Otto, J., Valade, A., and Luyssaert, S.: A multi-layer land surface energy budget model for implicit coupling with global atmospheric simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 223–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-223-2016, 2016. a
Sato, H., Itoh, A., and Kohyama, T.: SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global
Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach,
Ecol. Model., 200, 279–307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.006,
2007. a, b
Schulman, E.: Longevity under Adversity in Conifersca, Science, 119,
396–399, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.119.3091.396, 1954. a
Schweingruber, F. H.: Drimmie Schottland – PISY – ITRDB BRIT021 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/ctw7-nj47,
1995. a, b
Schweingruber, F. H.: Schweingruber – El Quintar – PISY – ITRDB SPAI006, https://doi.org/10.25921/406d-5k34, 2020. a
Shen, Y., Fukatsu, E., Muraoka, H., Saitoh, T. M., Hirano, Y., and Yasue, K.:
Climate responses of ring widths and radial growth phenology of Betula
ermanii, Fagus crenata and Quercus crispula in a cool temperate forest in
central Japan, Trees, 34, 679–692, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01948-w, 2020. a
Smith, B.: LPJ-GUESS-an ecosystem modelling framework, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystems Analysis, INES, Sölvegatan, 12, 22362, 2001. a
Steppe, K., De Pauw, D. J. W., Lemeur, R., and Vanrolleghem, P. A.: A
mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter
fluctuations and radial stem growth, Tree Physiol., 26, 257–273,
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.3.257, 2006. a
Stine, A. R.: Global demonstration of local Liebig's law behavior for
tree‐ring reconstructions of climate, Paleoceanogr.
Paleoclimatol., 34, 203–216, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018PA003449, 2019. a, b
Strumia, G.: Weinerwald – QUPE – ITRDB AUST112 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/18tv-he69, 2005. a
Teets, A., Fraver, S., Weiskittel, A. R., and Hollinger, D. Y.: Quantifying
climate–growth relationships at the stand level in a mature mixed‐species
conifer forest, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 3587–3602, 2018. a
Temme, A. A., Liu, J. C., Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., and Aerts,
R.: Winners always win: growth of a wide range of plant species from low to
future high CO2, Ecol. Evolut., 5, 4949–4961,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1687, 2015. a
Tessier, L.: Mimet (mt. L' Eloile) – PISY – ITRDB FRAN4 – RWL, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.25921/e5zh-ry13, 1996. a
Vaganov, E. A., Hughes, M. K., and Shashkin, A. V.: Growth dynamics of conifer tree rings: images of past and future environments, vol. 183, Springer, New York, 2006. a
Viovy, N.: CRUNCEP data set Version 5.3.2, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.5065/PZ8F-F017, 2016. a
Vuichard, N., Messina, P., Luyssaert, S., Guenet, B., Zaehle, S., Ghattas, J., Bastrikov, V., and Peylin, P.: Accounting for carbon and nitrogen interactions in the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE (trunk version, rev 4999): multi-scale evaluation of gross primary production, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4751–4779, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Wilkinson, S., Ogée, J. J., Domec, J.-C. C., Rayment, M., and Wingate,
L.: Biophysical modelling of intra-ring variations in tracheid features and
wood density of Pinus pinaster trees exposed to seasonal droughts, Tree
Physiol., 35, 305–318, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv010, 2015. a
Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M., Stoy, P. C., Peylin, P., Verbeeck, H., Carvalhais, N., Jung, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Kattge, J., Leuning, R., Luo, Y., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and Wang, Y.-P.: Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data, Biogeosciences, 6, 1341–1359, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1341-2009, 2009. a
Wilson, B. F. and Howard, R. A.: A computer model for cambial activity,
Forest Sci., 14, 77–90, https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/14.1.77, 1968. a
Wolf, A., Ciais, P., Bellassen, V., Delbart, N., Field, C. B., and Berry,
J. A.: Forest biomass allometry in global land surface models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003917, 2011. a
Yue, C., Ciais, P., Cadule, P., Thonicke, K., Archibald, S., Poulter, B., Hao, W. M., Hantson, S., Mouillot, F., Friedlingstein, P., Maignan, F., and Viovy, N.: Modelling the role of fires in the terrestrial carbon balance by incorporating SPITFIRE into the global vegetation model ORCHIDEE – Part 1: simulating historical global burned area and fire regimes, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2747–2767, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2747-2014, 2014. a
Zaehle, S. and Friend, A. D.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN
land surface model: 1. Model description, site‐scale evaluation, and
sensitivity to parameter estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1005,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521, 2010.
a, b, c
Zhang, Z., Babst, F., Bellassen, V., Frank, D., Launois, T., Tan, K., Ciais,
P., and Poulter, B.: Converging Climate Sensitivities of European Forests
Between Observed Radial Tree Growth and Vegetation Models, Ecosystems, 21,
410–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0157-5, 2018. a
Zhao, S., Pederson, N., D'Orangeville, L., HilleRisLambers, J., Boose, E.,
Penone, C., Bauer, B., Jiang, Y., and Manzanedo, R. D.: The International
Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) revisited: Data availability and global
ecological representativity, J. Biogeogr., 46, 355–368,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13488, 2019. a, b, c
Zuidema, P. A., Vlam, M., and Chien, P. D.: Ages and long-term growth patterns of four threatened Vietnamese tree species, Trees, 25, 29–38,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0473-2, 2011. a
Zuidema, P. A., Poulter, B., and Frank, D. C.: A Wood Biology Agenda to
Support Global Vegetation Modelling, Trends Plant Sci., 23,
1006–1015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.003, 2018. a
Zuidema, P. A., Heinrich, I., Rahman, M., Vlam, M., Zwartsenberg, S. A., and
Sleen, P.: Recent CO2 rise has modified the sensitivity of tropical tree
growth to rainfall and temperature, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 4028–4041,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15092, 2020. a
Short summary
We have proposed and evaluated the use of four benchmarks that leverage tree-ring width observations to provide more nuanced verification targets for land-surface models (LSMs), which currently lack a long-term benchmark for forest ecosystem functioning. Using relatively unbiased European biomass network datasets, we identify the extent to which presumed biases in the much larger International Tree-Ring Data Bank might degrade the validation of LSMs.
We have proposed and evaluated the use of four benchmarks that leverage tree-ring width...
