Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4241-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4241-2021
Development and technical paper
 | 
06 Jul 2021
Development and technical paper |  | 06 Jul 2021

Parallel computing efficiency of SWAN 40.91

Christo Rautenbach, Julia C. Mullarney, and Karin R. Bryan

Related authors

Marine meteorological forecasts for coastal ocean users – perceptions, usability and uptake
Christo Rautenbach and Berill Blair
Geosci. Commun., 4, 361–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-361-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-361-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Oceanography
Barents-2.5km v2.0: an operational data-assimilative coupled ocean and sea ice ensemble prediction model for the Barents Sea and Svalbard
Johannes Röhrs, Yvonne Gusdal, Edel S. U. Rikardsen, Marina Durán Moro, Jostein Brændshøi, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Sindre Fritzner, Keguang Wang, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, Martina Idžanović, Thomas Lavergne, Jens Boldingh Debernard, and Kai H. Christensen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5401–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, 2023
Short summary
Open-ocean tides simulated by ICON-O, version icon-2.6.6
Jin-Song von Storch, Eileen Hertwig, Veit Lüschow, Nils Brüggemann, Helmuth Haak, Peter Korn, and Vikram Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5179–5196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5179-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Using Probability Density Functions to Evaluate Models (PDFEM, v1.0) to compare a biogeochemical model with satellite-derived chlorophyll
Bror F. Jönsson, Christopher L. Follett, Jacob Bien, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, Sangwon Hyun, Gemma Kulk, Gael L. Forget, Christian Müller, Marie-Fanny Racault, Christopher N. Hill, Thomas Jackson, and Shubha Sathyendranath
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4639–4657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4639-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Data assimilation sensitivity experiments in the East Auckland Current system using 4D-Var
Rafael Santana, Helen Macdonald, Joanne O'Callaghan, Brian Powell, Sarah Wakes, and Sutara H. Suanda
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3675–3698, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3675-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3675-2023, 2023
Short summary
Using the COAsT Python package to develop a standardised validation workflow for ocean physics models
David Byrne, Jeff Polton, Enda O'Dea, and Joanne Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3749–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Babatunde, A., Pascale, B., Sin, C. C., William, C., Peter, C., Fatima, D., Seita, E., Veronika, E., Forest, C., Peter, G., Eric, G., Christian, J., Vladimir, K., Chris, R., and Markku, R.: Evaluation of Climate Models, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013. 
Collins, J. I.: Prediction of shallow-water spectra, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 2693–2707, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC077i015p02693, 1972. 
de Souza, J. M. A. C., Couto, P., Soutelino, R., and Roughan, M.: Evaluation of four global ocean reanalysis products for New Zealand waters – A guide for regional ocean modelling, New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh., 55, 132–155, https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2020.1713179, 2020. 
Dietrich, J. C., Tanaka, S., Westerink, J. J., Dawson, C. N., Luettich, R. A., Zijlema, M., Holthuijsen, L. H., Smith, J. M., Westerink, L. G., and Westerink, H. J.: Performance of the Unstructured-Mesh, SWAN+ADCIRC Model in Computing Hurricane Waves and Surge, J. Sci. Comput., 52, 468–497, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-011-9555-6, 2012. 
Frihy, O. E.: The necessity of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in implementing coastal projects: lessons learned from the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast, Ocean Coast. Manage., 44, 489–516, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00062-X, 2001. 
Download
Short summary
The simulation of ocean waves is important for various reasons, e.g. ship route safety and coastal vulnerability assessments. SWAN is a popular tool with which ocean waves may be predicted. Simulations using this tool can be computationally expensive. The present study thus aimed to understand which typical parallel-computing SWAN model set-up will be most effective. There thus do exist configurations where these simulations are most time-saving and effective.