Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3879-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3879-2021
Model description paper
 | 
24 Jun 2021
Model description paper |  | 24 Jun 2021

Partitioning soil organic carbon into its centennially stable and active fractions with machine-learning models based on Rock-Eval® thermal analysis (PARTYSOCv2.0 and PARTYSOCv2.0EU)

Lauric Cécillon, François Baudin, Claire Chenu, Bent T. Christensen, Uwe Franko, Sabine Houot, Eva Kanari, Thomas Kätterer, Ines Merbach, Folkert van Oort, Christopher Poeplau, Juan Carlos Quezada, Florence Savignac, Laure N. Soucémarianadin, and Pierre Barré

Related authors

A robust initialization method for accurate soil organic carbon simulations
Eva Kanari, Lauric Cécillon, François Baudin, Hugues Clivot, Fabien Ferchaud, Sabine Houot, Florent Levavasseur, Bruno Mary, Laure Soucémarianadin, Claire Chenu, and Pierre Barré
Biogeosciences, 19, 375–387, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-375-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-375-2022, 2022
Short summary
Long-term bare-fallow soil fractions reveal thermo-chemical properties controlling soil organic carbon dynamics
Mathieu Chassé, Suzanne Lutfalla, Lauric Cécillon, François Baudin, Samuel Abiven, Claire Chenu, and Pierre Barré
Biogeosciences, 18, 1703–1718, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1703-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1703-2021, 2021
Short summary
A model based on Rock-Eval thermal analysis to quantify the size of the centennially persistent organic carbon pool in temperate soils
Lauric Cécillon, François Baudin, Claire Chenu, Sabine Houot, Romain Jolivet, Thomas Kätterer, Suzanne Lutfalla, Andy Macdonald, Folkert van Oort, Alain F. Plante, Florence Savignac, Laure N. Soucémarianadin, and Pierre Barré
Biogeosciences, 15, 2835–2849, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2835-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2835-2018, 2018
Ideas and perspectives: Can we use the soil carbon saturation deficit to quantitatively assess the soil carbon storage potential, or should we explore other strategies?
Pierre Barré, Denis A. Angers, Isabelle Basile-Doelsch, Antonio Bispo, Lauric Cécillon, Claire Chenu, Tiphaine Chevallier, Delphine Derrien, Thomas K. Eglin, and Sylvain Pellerin
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-395,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-395, 2017
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Modeling boreal forest soil dynamics with the microbially explicit soil model MIMICS+ (v1.0)
Elin Ristorp Aas, Heleen A. de Wit, and Terje K. Berntsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2929–2959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Optimal enzyme allocation leads to the constrained enzyme hypothesis: the Soil Enzyme Steady Allocation Model (SESAM; v3.1)
Thomas Wutzler, Christian Reimers, Bernhard Ahrens, and Marion Schrumpf
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2705–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementing a dynamic representation of fire and harvest including subgrid-scale heterogeneity in the tile-based land surface model CLASSIC v1.45
Salvatore R. Curasi, Joe R. Melton, Elyn R. Humphreys, Txomin Hermosilla, and Michael A. Wulder
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2683–2704, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2683-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2683-2024, 2024
Short summary
Inferring the tree regeneration niche from inventory data using a dynamic forest model
Yannek Käber, Florian Hartig, and Harald Bugmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2727–2753, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Optimising CH4 simulations from the LPJ-GUESS model v4.1 using an adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm
Jalisha T. Kallingal, Johan Lindström, Paul A. Miller, Janne Rinne, Maarit Raivonen, and Marko Scholze
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2299–2324, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2299-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2299-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abiven, S., Menasseri, S., and Chenu, C.: The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability – A literature analysis, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.015, 2009. 
Amundson, R., Berhe, A. A., Hopmans, J. W., Olson, C., Sztein, A. E., and Sparks, D. L.: Soil and human security in the 21st century, Science, 348, 1261071–1261071, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071, 2015. 
Ansorge, H.: Die Wirkung des Stallmistes im “Statischen Düngungsversuch” Lauchstädt, 2. Mitteilung: Veränderung des Humusgehaltes im Boden, 10, 401–412, 1966. 
Avery, B. W. and Catt, J. A.: The soil at Rothamsted, Lawes Agricultural Trust, Harpenden, 1995. 
Baldock, J. A., Hawke, B., Sanderman, J., and Macdonald, L. M.: Predicting contents of carbon and its component fractions in Australian soils from diffuse reflectance mid-infrared spectra, Soil Res., 51, 577, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR13077, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
Partitioning soil organic carbon (SOC) into fractions that are stable or active on a century scale is key for more accurate models of the carbon cycle. Here, we describe the second version of a machine-learning model, named PARTYsoc, which reliably predicts the proportion of the centennially stable SOC fraction at its northwestern European validation sites with Cambisols and Luvisols, the two dominant soil groups in this region, fostering modelling works of SOC dynamics.