Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 3

Methods for assessment of models 23 Mar 2021

Methods for assessment of models | 23 Mar 2021

Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences

Bruno Ringeval et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,054 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
736 280 38 1,054 90 37 42
  • HTML: 736
  • PDF: 280
  • XML: 38
  • Total: 1,054
  • Supplement: 90
  • BibTeX: 37
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 862 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
We assess how and why global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield. We build a GCCM emulator based on generic formalism and fit its parameters against aboveground biomass and yield at harvest simulated by eight GGCMs. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that the calibration of a few key parameters allows the emulator to reproduce the GGCM simulations. Our simple but mechanistic model could help to improve the global simulation of potential yield.
Read more