Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4271–4285, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4271-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4271–4285, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4271-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
Development and technical paper
16 Sep 2020
Development and technical paper | 16 Sep 2020

Can machine learning improve the model representation of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the boundary layer for complex terrain?

Nicola Bodini et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,884 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,314 521 49 1,884 145 53 48
  • HTML: 1,314
  • PDF: 521
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 1,884
  • Supplement: 145
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,601 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,594 with geography defined and 7 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Jun 2022
Download
Short summary
While turbulence dissipation rate (ε) is an essential parameter for the prediction of wind speed, its current representation in weather prediction models is inaccurate, especially in complex terrain. In this study, we leverage the potential of machine-learning techniques to provide a more accurate representation of turbulence dissipation rate. Our results show a 30 % reduction in the average error compared to the current model representation of ε and a total elimination of its average bias.
Read more