Articles | Volume 13, issue 7
Model evaluation paper
17 Jul 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 17 Jul 2020

Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project

Stijn Hantson, Douglas I. Kelley, Almut Arneth, Sandy P. Harrison, Sally Archibald, Dominique Bachelet, Matthew Forrest, Thomas Hickler, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, Stephane Mangeon, Joe R. Melton, Lars Nieradzik, Sam S. Rabin, I. Colin Prentice, Tim Sheehan, Stephen Sitch, Lina Teckentrup, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Chao Yue


Total article views: 7,099 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,513 1,524 62 7,099 672 67 95
  • HTML: 5,513
  • PDF: 1,524
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 7,099
  • Supplement: 672
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,099 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,100 with geography defined and 999 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1


Latest update: 25 Feb 2024

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Global fire–vegetation models are widely used, but there has been limited evaluation of how well they represent various aspects of fire regimes. Here we perform a systematic evaluation of simulations made by nine FireMIP models in order to quantify their ability to reproduce a range of fire and vegetation benchmarks. While some FireMIP models are better at representing certain aspects of the fire regime, no model clearly outperforms all other models across the full range of variables assessed.