Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1975-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1975-2020
Model description paper
 | 
21 Apr 2020
Model description paper |  | 21 Apr 2020

The Cloud-resolving model Radar SIMulator (CR-SIM) Version 3.3: description and applications of a virtual observatory

Mariko Oue, Aleksandra Tatarevic, Pavlos Kollias, Dié Wang, Kwangmin Yu, and Andrew M. Vogelmann

Related authors

Shallow cloud variability in Houston, Texas, during the ESCAPE and TRACER field experiments
Zackary Mages, Pavlos Kollias, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Paloma Borque, and Mariko Oue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6025–6045, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6025-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6025-2025, 2025
Short summary
A radar view of ice microphysics and turbulence in Arctic stratiform cloud systems
Jialin Yan, Mariko Oue, Pavlos Kollias, Edward Luke, and Fan Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2149,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2149, 2025
Short summary
Detection of Multi-Modal Doppler Spectra. Part 1: Establishing Characteristic Signals in Radar Moment Data
Sarah Wugofski, Matthew R. Kumjian, Mariko Oue, and Pavlos Kollias
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-671,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-671, 2025
Short summary
Synthesis of surface snowfall rates and radar-observed storm structures in 10+ years of Northeast US winter storms
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, Mariko Oue, and Charles N. Helms
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6, 2025
Short summary
Shallow- and deep-convection characteristics in the greater Houston, Texas, area using cell tracking methodology
Kristofer S. Tuftedal, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Mariko Oue, and Pavlos Kollias
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5637–5657, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5637-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5637-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Optimized dynamic mode decomposition for reconstruction and forecasting of atmospheric chemistry data
Meghana Velagar, Christoph Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4667–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpolating turbulent heat fluxes missing from a prairie observation on the Tibetan Plateau using artificial intelligence models
Quanzhe Hou, Zhiqiu Gao, Zexia Duan, and Minghui Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4625–4641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Carbon dioxide plume dispersion simulated at the hectometer scale using DALES: model formulation and observational evaluation
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Fredrik Jansson, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4571–4599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025, 2025
Short summary
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary
SynRad v1.0: a radar forward operator to simulate synthetic weather radar observations from volcanic ash clouds
Vishnu Nair, Anujah Mohanathan, Michael Herzog, David G. Macfarlane, and Duncan A. Robertson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4417-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, B. A.: Parameterization of trade-cumulus cloud amounts, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 97–105, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<0097:POTCCA>2.0.CO;2, 1981. 
Angevine, W, Olson, J., Kenyon, J., Gustafson, W., Endo, S., Suselj, K., and Turner, D.: Shallow cumulus in WRF parameterizations evaluated against LASSO large-eddy simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 4303–4322, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0115.1, 2018. 
Andsager, K., Beard, K. V., and Laird, N. F.: Laboratory measurements of axis ratios for large drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2673–2683, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2673:LMOARF>2.0.CO;2, 1999. 
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Research Facility. LASSO Data Bundles, 363618.0′′ N, 97296.0′′ W: Southern Great Plains Central Facility (C1), compiled by: Gustafson, W. I., Vogelmann, A. M., Cheng, X., Endo, S., Johnson, K. L., Krishna, B., Li, Z., Toto, T., and Xiao, H., ARM Data Archive: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, https://doi.org/10.5439/1342961, data set accessed at: September 2017. 
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New York, 530 p., ISBN 0-471-29340-7, ISBN 978-0-471-29340-8 (second edition), 1998. 
Download
Short summary
We developed the Cloud-resolving model Radar SIMulator (CR-SIM) capable of apples-to-apples comparisons between the multiwavelength, zenith-pointing, and scanning radar and multi-remote-sensing (radar and lidar) observations and the high-resolution atmospheric model output. Applications of CR-SIM as a virtual observatory operator aid interpretation of the differences and improve understanding of the representativeness errors due to the sampling limitations of the ground-based measurements.
Share