Dear Dr Piton,

As you can see from the reviewer's report, the reviewer is largely satisified with the changes made in the revised manuscript. There are just a few fairly technical issues that they still have. Once these are addressed I will be in a position to accept the manuscript for publication.

Regards,

David

Dear Violane,

Thanks for addressing the reviewer's comments. The only remaining issue, which I should have picked up last time, is that the Zenodo citations in the code and data availability section are presented incorrectly. You have included URLs for locations on the Zenodo website. This is incorrect for two reasons. First, you should be using the DOI, not the URL, and second the citations should be presented in the bibliography and cited from the text like any other reference.

If you navigate to any of your Zenodo pages, e.g. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2669396, and look to the bottom right, it shows you the correct form of the bibliography entry, in that case it is:

Piton Violaine. (2019). Grid for T-UGO [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2640763

An example of a GMDD manuscript with correct Zenodo citations in the code and data availability section is: https://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2019-86/gmd-2019-86.pdf

Regards,

David