Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3641–3648, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3641–3648, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019
Methods for assessment of models
22 Aug 2019
Methods for assessment of models | 22 Aug 2019

Systematic bias in evaluating chemical transport models with maximum daily 8 h average (MDA8) surface ozone for air quality applications: a case study with GEOS-Chem v9.02

Katherine R. Travis and Daniel J. Jacob

Viewed

Total article views: 2,308 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,380 901 27 2,308 45 44
  • HTML: 1,380
  • PDF: 901
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 2,308
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,308 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,978 with geography defined and 330 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Feb 2023
Download
Short summary
Models of ozone air pollution are often evaluated with the policy metric set by the EPA of the maximum daily 8 h average ozone concentration. These models may be used in policy settings to evaluate air quality regulations. However, most models have difficulty simulating how ozone varies over the course of the day, and thus the use of this metric in model evaluation is problematic. Improved representation of mixed layer dynamics and ozone loss to the surface is needed to resolve this issue.