Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2855-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2855-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
Model evaluation paper
 | 
11 Jul 2019
Model evaluation paper |  | 11 Jul 2019

A spatial evaluation of high-resolution wind fields from empirical and dynamical modeling in hilly and mountainous terrain

Christoph Schlager, Gottfried Kirchengast, Juergen Fuchsberger, Alexander Kann, and Heimo Truhetz

Viewed

Total article views: 3,165 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,079 1,008 78 3,165 86 86
  • HTML: 2,079
  • PDF: 1,008
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 3,165
  • BibTeX: 86
  • EndNote: 86
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,165 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,881 with geography defined and 284 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 09 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Empirical high-resolution surface wind fields from two study areas, automatically generated by a weather diagnostic application, were intercompared with wind fields of different modeling approaches. The focus is on evaluating spatial differences and displacements between the different datasets. In general, the spatial verification indicates a better statistical agreement for the first study area (hilly WegenerNet Feldbach Region), than for the second one (mountainous WegenerNet Johnsbachtal).
Read more
Share