156 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Informed Local Smoothing in 3D Implicit Geological Modeling J. von Harten et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111281
2. Integrating Deep Learning and Deterministic Inversion for Enhancing Fault Detection in Electrical Resistivity Surveys S. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106250
3. Model-Based Probabilistic Inversion Using Magnetic Data: A Case Study on the Kevitsa Deposit N. Güdük et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11040150
4. Multi-Scale 3D Convolution Neural Network with Lightweight Attention Mechanisms for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Pulang Porphyry Deposit, Yunnan Province, Southwest China X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-026-10726-8
5. Impact of In-Situ Density Spatial Model Methods on Resource Tonnages in Highly Intruded Coal Deposits K. Maxwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09989-0
6. Modelling and inferring fracture curvature from borehole GPR data: A case study from the Bedretto Laboratory, Switzerland D. Escallon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12286
7. Automated geological map deconstruction for 3D model construction using map2loop 1.0 and map2model 1.0 M. Jessell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5063-2021
8. LFD (v1.0): latent-compression-free generative diffusion with geological priors and geophysical regularization for implicit structural modeling Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7961-2026
9. Subdivide and Conquer: Adapting Non-Manifold Subdivision Surfaces to Surface-Based Representation and Reconstruction of Complex Geological Structures M. Moulaeifard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-022-10017-x
10. Towards the geological parametrization of seismic tomography V. Tsai et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad140
11. Estimation of Aquifer Storativity Using 3D Geological Modeling and the Spatial Random Bagging Simulation Method: The Saskatchewan River Basin Case Study (Central Canada) M. Hamdi & K. Goïta https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061156
12. Checking the consistency of 3D geological models M. Parquer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-71-2025
13. Accelerating uncertainty quantification of groundwater flow modelling using a deep neural network proxy M. Lykkegaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113895
14. GeoSAE: A 3D Stratigraphic Modeling Method Driven by Geological Constraint Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031185
15. Structural, petrophysical, and geological constraints in potential field inversion using the Tomofast-x v1.0 open-source code J. Giraud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6681-2021
16. Modelling of faults in LoopStructural 1.0 L. Grose et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6197-2021
17. Estimating relative uncertainty of geological 3D models with low density of input data in geologically complex regions F. Staněk et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01778-0
18. Geodynamic Modeling With Uncertain Initial Geometries A. Spang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC010265
19. Impact of structural uncertainty on tracer test design in faulted geothermal reservoirs A. Dashti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102607
20. Automated extraction of orientation and stratigraphic thickness from geological maps L. Nibourel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2023.104865
21. GEOMODELATOR-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for 3D geological modelling T. Kempka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2026.102630
22. The stochastic simulation of karst conduit network structure using anisotropic fast marching, and its application to a geologically complex alpine karst system C. Fandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02464-x
23. Uncertainty assessment for 3D geologic modeling of fault zones based on geologic inputs and prior knowledge A. Krajnovich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1457-2020
24. Lithospheric strength and elastic properties for Mars from InSight geophysical data K. Crane & J. Rich https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115581
25. Uncertainty quantification using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for structural geological modelling with implicit neural representations (INR) K. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2026.106123
26. Three-Dimensional Geologic Modeling of the Kiruna Mining District, Sweden: Insights into the Crustal Architecture and Structural Controls on Iron Oxide-Apatite Mineralization E. Veress et al. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.5080
27. Incremental Emplacement of the Sierra Nevada Batholith Constrained by U-Pb Ages and Potential Field Data H. Sehsah et al. https://doi.org/10.1086/722724
28. 3D structural modeling for seismic exploration based on knowledge graphs X. Zhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0924.1
29. Visualizing the invisible: The use of a new interactive sandbox for teaching evolutionary geological processes A. Marini https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2026201010
30. Towards plausible lithological classification from geophysical inversion: honouring geological principles in subsurface imaging J. Giraud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-419-2020
31. Integrating deep learning and discrete cosine transform for surface waves full-waveform inversion F. Rincón et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae407
32. Fault representation in structural modelling with implicit neural representations K. Gao & F. Wellmann https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105911
33. Automatic generation of 2D and 3D geological models using biharmonic functions M. Karaoulis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2026.106271
34. Modeling a geologically complex volcanic watershed for integrated water resources management in Mt. Fuji, Japan S. Musy et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06380-z
35. A generalizable automated geophysical agent workflow for accessible subsurface hydrology analysis H. Chen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdes.2026.100042
36. Geomodelamiento 3D con datos escasos en esquema de código abierto: un caso de estudio en la cuenca de los Llanos en Colombia L. Gómez-Santamaría et al. https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v48n1-2026004
37. The role of geological models and uncertainties in safety assessments M. Bjorge et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10305-z
38. Curlew 1.0: Spatio-temporal implicit geological modelling with neural fields in python A. Kamath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3455-2026
39. Imaging-Guided Pattern Optimization for Seismic Acquisition Geometries Design With Deep Learning A. Mantilla-Dulcey & H. Arguello https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2026.3698802
40. CurvRBF: Mean Curvature-Controllable Radial Basis Functions for Implicit Geological Modeling Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10226-0
41. Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models H. Olierook et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.015
42. G&M3D 1.0: an interactive framework for 3D model construction and forward calculation of potential fields D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5173-2026
43. Unified manifold element mesh generation for geomechanics: Geological multi-representation input adaptation and parallelization J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.108334
44. Actors, actions, and uncertainties: optimizing decision-making based on 3-D structural geological models F. Stamm et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2015-2019
45. Rapid Implicit 3D geological modelling from a large quantity of boreholes via a divide-and-conquer strategy based on Voronoi diagrams and R-functions X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108348
46. Knowledge-driven stochastic modeling of geological geometry features conditioned on drillholes and outcrop contacts X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105779
47. Intelligent Optimization of Coal Mine Dynamic Disaster Control via Deep Learning Surrogate Models and Global Digital Twin Computation Y. Pu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2026.109013
48. Joint interpretation of potential field data using independent Lpq norm inversion and geological modeling: Application to Iron targeting in Central Iran B. Sadraeifar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107347
49. Three-Dimensional Fine Geological Modeling Utilizing a Novel Implicit Neural Network to Constrain Mesh Partitioning Algorithm From GPR Data K. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3707940
50. Modeling the Uncertainty in the Layout of Geological Units by Implicit Boundary Simulation Accounting for a Preexisting Interpretive Geological Model R. Ferrer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09964-9
51. An integrated modeling scheme for characterizing 3D hydrogeological heterogeneity of the New Jersey shelf A. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-022-09475-z
52. Incorporating geological structure into sensitivity analysis of subsurface contaminant transport L. Bigler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104885
53. Estimating uncertainties in 3-D models of complex fold-and-thrust belts: A case study of the Eastern Alps triangle zone S. Brisson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2023.100115
54. Towards a workflow to evaluate geological layering uncertainty on CO2 injection simulation C. Legentil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2023.100118
55. Deformation scale using harmonic curvature analysis: A case study from the Hamersley Province D. Nathan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104302
56. GeoINR 1.0: an implicit neural network approach to three-dimensional geological modelling M. Hillier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023
57. PySubdiv 1.0: open-source geological modeling and reconstruction by non-manifold subdivision surfaces M. Moulaeifard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3565-2023
58. Integrating Remote Sensing and Knowledge-Based Systems for Structural Lineament Mapping in the Rif Belt M. Alaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15090336
59. Blockworlds 0.1.0: a demonstration of anti-aliased geophysics for probabilistic inversions of implicit and kinematic geological models R. Scalzo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3641-2022
60. An improved mapping adaptation method from three-dimensional non-solid geological information models to numerical computational models Z. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1971400
61. Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling for 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success R. Scalzo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019
62. GeoBO: Python package for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation and Joint Inversion in Geosciences S. Haan https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02690
63. An algorithm for identifying stratigraphic piles from interpreted boreholes L. Schorpp et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1461658
64. The Potential of Machine Learning for a More Responsible Sourcing of Critical Raw Materials P. Ghamisi et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3108049
65. loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification G. Pirot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022
66. An automatic geological 3D cross-section generator: Geopropy, an open-source library A. Hassanzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105309
67. Variational Gaussian processes for implicit geological modeling Í. Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105323
68. Multiscale progressive 3D geological modeling based on isochronous stratigraphy identification in urban underground space Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04185-3
69. Probabilistic stratigraphic modeling of waste soil landfills using multiple UAV data S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.107903
70. Combining implicit geological modeling, field surveys, and hydrogeological modeling to describe groundwater flow in a karst aquifer F. D’Affonseca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02220-z
71. A greedy sensor selection algorithm for hyperparameterized linear Bayesian inverse problems with correlated noise models N. Aretz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112599
72. A model ensemble generator to explore structural uncertainty in karst systems with unmapped conduits C. Fandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02227-6
73. PyGMI - a python package for geoscience modelling and interpretation P. Cole https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.07019
74. 3D structural implicit modelling of folded metamorphic units at Lago di Cignana with uncertainty assessment G. Arienti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105329
75. Constraining 3D geometric gravity inversion with a 2D reflection seismic profile using a generalized level set approach: application to the eastern Yilgarn Craton M. Rashidifard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-2387-2021
76. AdaHRBF v1.0: gradient-adaptive Hermite–Birkhoff radial basis function interpolants for three-dimensional stratigraphic implicit modeling B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3651-2023
77. Flexible Geological Modeling with Radial Basis Functions Integrating External Drift J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10250-0
78. GeoPDNN 1.0: a semi-supervised deep learning neural network using pseudo-labels for three-dimensional shallow strata modelling and uncertainty analysis in urban areas from borehole data J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-957-2024
79. The Geodynamic World Builder: A planetary structure creator for the geosciences M. Fraters et al. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06671
80. Automated Hierarchical 3D Modeling of Quaternary Aquifers: The ArchPy Approach L. Schorpp et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.884075
81. Regional-scale 3D modelling in metamorphic belts: An implicit model-driven workflow applied in the Pennine Alps G. Arienti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2023.105045
82. An improved parametric 3D geologic modeling framework for seismic structure identification using deep learning in complex geologic settings L. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2024-0532.1
83. Virtual Reality Modelling of Garden Geography and Geology Based on 3D Modelling Technology Q. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1952/2/022053
84. 3D simulation of complex fractures with a simple mesh J. Wu https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6986
85. Characteristics and controls of an offshore freshened groundwater system in the Shengsi region, East China Sea A. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1198215
86. Integrated framework for geological modeling: integration of data, knowledge, and methods H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03794-8
87. LoopStructural 1.0: time-aware geological modelling L. Grose et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3915-2021
88. A Scenario-Based Simulation Model for Earthwork Cost Management Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology T. Rachmawati et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010503
89. ArchPy and MODFLOW: Toward a General Integration of Heterogeneity into Groundwater Models L. Schorpp et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.70028
90. Geophysical model generation with generative adversarial networks V. Puzyrev et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-022-00241-y
91. Implicit 3D structural geological modeling of the Mexico Basin: a scalable and reproducible open-source workflow J. Montaño-Caro & E. Morales-Casique https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-02064-9
92. 3D Modeling of Large-Scale Geological Structures by Linear Combinations of Implicit Functions: Application to a Large Banded Iron Formation L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09901-w
93. Uncertainties and robustness with regard to the safety of a repository for high-level radioactive waste: introduction of a research initiative K. Kurgyis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11346-8
94. Einstein-Telescope in the Euregio-Meuse-Rhine – Preliminary engineering geological site characterization for siting and design R. Burchartz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04623-2
95. Spatial uncertainty constraints reduce overfitting for potential field geophysical inversion M. Lindsay et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag133
96. SubsurfaceBreaks v. 1.0: a supervised detection of fault-related structures on triangulated models of subsurface homoclinal interfaces M. Michalak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4469-2025
97. Data- and knowledge-driven three-dimensional geological reconstruction method for tunnel engineering Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.08.028
98. Unraveling the uncertainty of geological interfaces through data-knowledge-driven trend surface analysis L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105419
99. Bedding Scale Correlation on Mars in Western Arabia Terra A. Annex et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JE007776
100. 3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models G. Piris et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217338
101. Geologically guided ambient noise tomography inversion with 3-D interface structures: methodology and application to a gold mine region in China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf376
102. On the visualization of 3D geological models and their uncertainty B. Zehner https://doi.org/10.1127/zdgg/2020/0251
103. Can Agents Model Hydrocarbon Migration for Petroleum System Analysis? A Fast Screening Tool to De-Risk Hydrocarbon Prospects B. Steffens et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030902
104. Towards an open-source landscape for 3-D CSEM modelling D. Werthmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab238
105. Horizon-assisted lithologic modeling: understanding Mississippi Embayment and Coastal Lowlands aquifer systems in Louisiana and southwestern Mississippi, USA S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02804-z
106. pyKasso: An open-source three-dimensional discrete karst network generator F. Miville et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106362
107. Digital twins of geosystems O. Kolditz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egge.2026.100001
108. Implicit modelling and dynamic update of tunnel unfavourable geology based on multi-source data fusion using support vector machine B. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2023.2239778
109. Bridging the visual-computational gap: transforming UAV reality meshes into volumetric geological models via explicit-implicit integration Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105420
110. Three-dimensional hydrogeological parametrization using sparse piezometric data D. Rambourg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6147-2022
111. Three-dimensional geological modeling based on dual-task stratigraphy-aware attention networks (Geo-SAN v1.0) Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8407-2026
112. Automated Monte Carlo-based quantification and updating of geological uncertainty with borehole data (AutoBEL v1.0) Z. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-651-2020
113. Spatial agents for geological surface modelling E. de Kemp https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6661-2021
114. Automated geological modeling with ArcGIS Engine: a methodological framework for surface and subsurface data integration G. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-026-02185-9
115. 2.5-D Deep Learning Inversion of LWD and Deep-Sensing EM Measurements Across Formations With Dipping Faults K. Noh et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3128965
116. Developing a 3D hydrostratigraphical model of the emerged part of the Pelotas Basin along the northern coast of Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil L. Marquetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11609-y
117. Modelo estructural estocástico de bofedal mediante interpolación 3D de las conductividades eléctricas con gempy, microcuenca apacheta, 2021. J. Huaman Musaja https://doi.org/10.57063/ricay.v3i2.95
118. Quantitative benchmark of data-driven vs. knowledge-driven implicit modeling paradigms for complex fault networks Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2026.100418
119. A probabilistic geologic model of the Krafla geothermal system constrained by gravimetric data S. Scott et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-019-0143-6
120. The structural development of the strike-slip Água Bonita Basin, Brazil, using receiver function and the HVSR method D. Gomes-Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2025-012
121. Integration of automatic implicit geological modelling in deterministic geophysical inversion J. Giraud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-63-2024
122. Paleo-hydrological controls on continental-shelf groundwater salinity distribution offshore New Jersey, USA C. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135701
123. Integrated Three-Dimensional Structural and Petrophysical Modeling for Assessment of CO2 Storage Potential in Gas Reservoir S. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2024_222
124. Integrated Geologic Modeling of Fault-Block Reservoir: A Case Study of Ss Oil Field Z. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6864786
125. Delineation of LNAPL plumes in a clay-rich site in Gyeongsangnam-do Province, South Korea: integration of geophysical survey data with borehole data and soil sampling information B. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12202-9
126. Constraining stochastic 3-D structural geological models with topology information using approximate Bayesian computation in GemPy 2.1 A. Schaaf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021
127. Maximising the value of hyperspectral drill core scanning through real-time processing and analysis S. Thiele et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1433662
128. 3D structural and probabilistic modelling of geothermal reservoir horizons in the Northern Eifel and its foreland A. Jüstel et al. https://doi.org/10.1127/zdgg/2025/0436
129. An implicit storage method for 3D geological models supporting multiscale modelling and cross-sectional analysis Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2026.106204
130. Towards automatic and rapid 3D geological modelling of urban sedimentary strata from a large amount of borehole data using a parallel solution of implicit equations X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01164-8
131. Using an Open-Source Tool to Develop a Three-Dimensional Hydrogeologic Framework of the Kobo Valley, Ethiopia S. Mekonen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14010003
132. Generation of random geological models using multi-randomization for machine learning K. Gao & T. Chen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2026.106133
133. Stochastic inversion of gravity, magnetic, tracer, lithology, and fault data for geologically realistic structural models: Patua Geothermal Field case study A. Pollack et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102129
134. Computational modeling and analytical validation of singular geometric effects in fault data using a combinatorial approach M. Michalak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-1025-2025
135. Improving understanding of groundwater flow in an alpine karst system by reconstructing its geologic history using conduit network model ensembles C. Fandel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4205-2023
136. A method to construct statistical prior models of geology for probabilistic inversion of geophysical data R. Madsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107252
137. A seamless geo-flow modelling workflow to tackle structural uncertainty using LoopStructural and MODFLOW K. Bardot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106557
138. A machine learning model for structural trend fields Í. Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104715
139. Geological Modelling of Urban Environments Under Data Uncertainty C. Ntigkakis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15110423
140. 数据和知识融合的Bayesian-MCMC三维地质建模 L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2023.069
141. Integrative analysis of the Aachen geothermal system (Germany) with an interdisciplinary conceptual model E. Gómez-Díaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-024-00327-0
142. A Smart Data Hub to integrate subsurface properties into model-based decision-support tools Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07580-x
143. Geophysical tomography as a tool to estimate the geometry of soil layers: relevance for the reliability assessment of dikes J. Chavez Olalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2021.1971252
144. Structure-based geophysical inversion using implicit geological models A. Balza-Morales et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf445
145. Estimation of CO 2 saturation maps from synthetic seismic data using a deep-learning method with a multi-scale approach G. Pantaleo et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2023-057
146. GeophysicalModelGenerator.jl: A Julia package to visualise geoscientific data and create numerical model setups B. Kaus et al. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06763
147. Three-Dimensional Stratigraphic Structure and Property Collaborative Modeling in Urban Engineering Construction B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030345
148. A lightweight convolutional neural network with end-to-end learning for three-dimensional mineral prospectivity modeling: A case study of the Sanhetun Area, Heilongjiang Province, Northeastern China B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105788
149. Efficient geo-electromagnetic modeling techniques for complex geological structures: A karst MT example M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105557
150. A Python-enhanced urban land surface model SuPy (SUEWS in Python, v2019.2): development, deployment and demonstration T. Sun & S. Grimmond https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2781-2019
151. Integrating fault kinematics into implicit 3D modelling of fault networks L. Grose et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072997
152. Construction and Usefulness Verification of Modeling Method of Subsurface Soil Layers for Numerical Analysis of Urban Area Ground Motion H. Motoyama & M. Hori https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3020013
153. From Maps to Models - Tutorials for structural geological modeling using GemPy and GemGIS A. Jüstel et al. https://doi.org/10.21105/jose.00185
154. Vector-based three-dimensional (3D) well-path optimization assisted by geological modelling and borehole-log extraction M. Almedallah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100053
155. A geostatistical implicit modeling framework for uncertainty quantification of 3D geo-domain boundaries: Application to lithological domains from a porphyry copper deposit F. Fouedjio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104931
156. Kernel method for gravity forward simulation in implicit probabilistic geologic modeling Z. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0308.1