Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
GemPy 1.0: open-source stochastic geological modeling and inversion
Miguel de la Varga
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Computational Geoscience and Reservoir Engineering, RWTH
Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Alexander Schaaf
Institute for Computational Geoscience and Reservoir Engineering, RWTH
Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Florian Wellmann
Institute for Computational Geoscience and Reservoir Engineering, RWTH
Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 11,177 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Mar 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,589 | 7,375 | 213 | 11,177 | 124 | 90 |
- HTML: 3,589
- PDF: 7,375
- XML: 213
- Total: 11,177
- BibTeX: 124
- EndNote: 90
Total article views: 6,947 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Jan 2019)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,967 | 3,780 | 200 | 6,947 | 104 | 77 |
- HTML: 2,967
- PDF: 3,780
- XML: 200
- Total: 6,947
- BibTeX: 104
- EndNote: 77
Total article views: 4,230 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Mar 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
622 | 3,595 | 13 | 4,230 | 20 | 13 |
- HTML: 622
- PDF: 3,595
- XML: 13
- Total: 4,230
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 11,177 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 9,476 with geography defined
and 1,701 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,947 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,792 with geography defined
and 1,155 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,230 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,684 with geography defined
and 546 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
47 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Actors, actions, and uncertainties: optimizing decision-making based on 3-D structural geological models F. Stamm et al. 10.5194/se-10-2015-2019
- LoopStructural 1.0: time-aware geological modelling L. Grose et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3915-2021
- Informed Local Smoothing in 3D Implicit Geological Modeling J. von Harten et al. 10.3390/min11111281
- Model-Based Probabilistic Inversion Using Magnetic Data: A Case Study on the Kevitsa Deposit N. Güdük et al. 10.3390/geosciences11040150
- Impact of In-Situ Density Spatial Model Methods on Resource Tonnages in Highly Intruded Coal Deposits K. Maxwell et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09989-0
- Automated geological map deconstruction for 3D model construction using <i>map2loop</i> 1.0 and <i>map2model</i> 1.0 M. Jessell et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5063-2021
- Modeling the Uncertainty in the Layout of Geological Units by Implicit Boundary Simulation Accounting for a Preexisting Interpretive Geological Model R. Ferrer et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09964-9
- Integrated Geologic Modeling of Fault-Block Reservoir: A Case Study of Ss Oil Field Z. Xiao et al. 10.1155/2022/6864786
- Constraining stochastic 3-D structural geological models with topology information using approximate Bayesian computation in GemPy 2.1 A. Schaaf et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021
- Deformation scale using harmonic curvature analysis: A case study from the Hamersley Province D. Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104302
- Accelerating uncertainty quantification of groundwater flow modelling using a deep neural network proxy M. Lykkegaard et al. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113895
- Stochastic inversion of gravity, magnetic, tracer, lithology, and fault data for geologically realistic structural models: Patua Geothermal Field case study A. Pollack et al. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102129
- 3D Modeling of Large-Scale Geological Structures by Linear Combinations of Implicit Functions: Application to a Large Banded Iron Formation L. Yang et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09901-w
- Structural, petrophysical, and geological constraints in potential field inversion using the Tomofast-x v1.0 open-source code J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-6681-2021
- Modelling of faults in LoopStructural 1.0 L. Grose et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-6197-2021
- Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling for 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success R. Scalzo et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019
- A machine learning model for structural trend fields Í. Gonçalves et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104715
- GeoBO: Python package for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation and Joint Inversion in Geosciences S. Haan 10.21105/joss.02690
- The Potential of Machine Learning for a More Responsible Sourcing of Critical Raw Materials P. Ghamisi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3108049
- The stochastic simulation of karst conduit network structure using anisotropic fast marching, and its application to a geologically complex alpine karst system C. Fandel et al. 10.1007/s10040-022-02464-x
- Uncertainty assessment for 3D geologic modeling of fault zones based on geologic inputs and prior knowledge A. Krajnovich et al. 10.5194/se-11-1457-2020
- An automatic geological 3D cross-section generator: Geopropy, an open-source library A. Hassanzadeh et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105309
- 3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models G. Piris et al. 10.3390/en14217338
- Geophysical tomography as a tool to estimate the geometry of soil layers: relevance for the reliability assessment of dikes J. Chavez Olalla et al. 10.1080/17499518.2021.1971252
- Can Agents Model Hydrocarbon Migration for Petroleum System Analysis? A Fast Screening Tool to De-Risk Hydrocarbon Prospects B. Steffens et al. 10.3390/en15030902
- Combining implicit geological modeling, field surveys, and hydrogeological modeling to describe groundwater flow in a karst aquifer F. D’Affonseca et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02220-z
- Towards an open-source landscape for 3-D CSEM modelling D. Werthmüller et al. 10.1093/gji/ggab238
- Towards plausible lithological classification from geophysical inversion: honouring geological principles in subsurface imaging J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/se-11-419-2020
- A model ensemble generator to explore structural uncertainty in karst systems with unmapped conduits C. Fandel et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02227-6
- Constraining 3D geometric gravity inversion with a 2D reflection seismic profile using a generalized level set approach: application to the eastern Yilgarn Craton M. Rashidifard et al. 10.5194/se-12-2387-2021
- A Python-enhanced urban land surface model SuPy (SUEWS in Python, v2019.2): development, deployment and demonstration T. Sun & S. Grimmond 10.5194/gmd-12-2781-2019
- Integrating fault kinematics into implicit 3D modelling of fault networks L. Grose et al. 10.1080/22020586.2019.12072997
- Automated Monte Carlo-based quantification and updating of geological uncertainty with borehole data (AutoBEL v1.0) Z. Yin et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-651-2020
- The role of geological models and uncertainties in safety assessments M. Bjorge et al. 10.1007/s12665-022-10305-z
- Spatial agents for geological surface modelling E. de Kemp 10.5194/gmd-14-6661-2021
- Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models H. Olierook et al. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.015
- 2.5-D Deep Learning Inversion of LWD and Deep-Sensing EM Measurements Across Formations With Dipping Faults K. Noh et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3128965
- Virtual Reality Modelling of Garden Geography and Geology Based on 3D Modelling Technology Q. Zhang 10.1088/1742-6596/1952/2/022053
- A probabilistic geologic model of the Krafla geothermal system constrained by gravimetric data S. Scott et al. 10.1186/s40517-019-0143-6
- Vector-based three-dimensional (3D) well-path optimization assisted by geological modelling and borehole-log extraction M. Almedallah et al. 10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100053
- A geostatistical implicit modeling framework for uncertainty quantification of 3D geo-domain boundaries: Application to lithological domains from a porphyry copper deposit F. Fouedjio et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104931
- Certified reduced basis method in geosciences D. Degen et al. 10.1007/s10596-019-09916-6
- Implicit Structural Modeling by Minimization of the Bending Energy with Moving Least Squares Functions J. Renaudeau et al. 10.1007/s11004-019-09789-6
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Uncertainty. Toward a Unified, Data-Driven Framework for Uncertainty Characterization in Hydrogeology F. Heße et al. 10.3389/feart.2019.00118
- Boundary simulation – a hierarchical approach for multiple categories F. Amarante et al. 10.1080/25726838.2021.1889295
- Integration of geoscientific uncertainty into geophysical inversion by means of local gradient regularization J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/se-10-193-2019
- Geometric Element Preserving Reconstruction of a Geological Surface S. Yu et al. 10.1007/s13369-021-05536-4
41 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Actors, actions, and uncertainties: optimizing decision-making based on 3-D structural geological models F. Stamm et al. 10.5194/se-10-2015-2019
- LoopStructural 1.0: time-aware geological modelling L. Grose et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3915-2021
- Informed Local Smoothing in 3D Implicit Geological Modeling J. von Harten et al. 10.3390/min11111281
- Model-Based Probabilistic Inversion Using Magnetic Data: A Case Study on the Kevitsa Deposit N. Güdük et al. 10.3390/geosciences11040150
- Impact of In-Situ Density Spatial Model Methods on Resource Tonnages in Highly Intruded Coal Deposits K. Maxwell et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09989-0
- Automated geological map deconstruction for 3D model construction using <i>map2loop</i> 1.0 and <i>map2model</i> 1.0 M. Jessell et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5063-2021
- Modeling the Uncertainty in the Layout of Geological Units by Implicit Boundary Simulation Accounting for a Preexisting Interpretive Geological Model R. Ferrer et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09964-9
- Integrated Geologic Modeling of Fault-Block Reservoir: A Case Study of Ss Oil Field Z. Xiao et al. 10.1155/2022/6864786
- Constraining stochastic 3-D structural geological models with topology information using approximate Bayesian computation in GemPy 2.1 A. Schaaf et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021
- Deformation scale using harmonic curvature analysis: A case study from the Hamersley Province D. Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104302
- Accelerating uncertainty quantification of groundwater flow modelling using a deep neural network proxy M. Lykkegaard et al. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113895
- Stochastic inversion of gravity, magnetic, tracer, lithology, and fault data for geologically realistic structural models: Patua Geothermal Field case study A. Pollack et al. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102129
- 3D Modeling of Large-Scale Geological Structures by Linear Combinations of Implicit Functions: Application to a Large Banded Iron Formation L. Yang et al. 10.1007/s11053-021-09901-w
- Structural, petrophysical, and geological constraints in potential field inversion using the Tomofast-x v1.0 open-source code J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-6681-2021
- Modelling of faults in LoopStructural 1.0 L. Grose et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-6197-2021
- Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling for 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success R. Scalzo et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019
- A machine learning model for structural trend fields Í. Gonçalves et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104715
- GeoBO: Python package for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation and Joint Inversion in Geosciences S. Haan 10.21105/joss.02690
- The Potential of Machine Learning for a More Responsible Sourcing of Critical Raw Materials P. Ghamisi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3108049
- The stochastic simulation of karst conduit network structure using anisotropic fast marching, and its application to a geologically complex alpine karst system C. Fandel et al. 10.1007/s10040-022-02464-x
- Uncertainty assessment for 3D geologic modeling of fault zones based on geologic inputs and prior knowledge A. Krajnovich et al. 10.5194/se-11-1457-2020
- An automatic geological 3D cross-section generator: Geopropy, an open-source library A. Hassanzadeh et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105309
- 3DHIP-Calculator—A New Tool to Stochastically Assess Deep Geothermal Potential Using the Heat-In-Place Method from Voxel-Based 3D Geological Models G. Piris et al. 10.3390/en14217338
- Geophysical tomography as a tool to estimate the geometry of soil layers: relevance for the reliability assessment of dikes J. Chavez Olalla et al. 10.1080/17499518.2021.1971252
- Can Agents Model Hydrocarbon Migration for Petroleum System Analysis? A Fast Screening Tool to De-Risk Hydrocarbon Prospects B. Steffens et al. 10.3390/en15030902
- Combining implicit geological modeling, field surveys, and hydrogeological modeling to describe groundwater flow in a karst aquifer F. D’Affonseca et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02220-z
- Towards an open-source landscape for 3-D CSEM modelling D. Werthmüller et al. 10.1093/gji/ggab238
- Towards plausible lithological classification from geophysical inversion: honouring geological principles in subsurface imaging J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/se-11-419-2020
- A model ensemble generator to explore structural uncertainty in karst systems with unmapped conduits C. Fandel et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02227-6
- Constraining 3D geometric gravity inversion with a 2D reflection seismic profile using a generalized level set approach: application to the eastern Yilgarn Craton M. Rashidifard et al. 10.5194/se-12-2387-2021
- A Python-enhanced urban land surface model SuPy (SUEWS in Python, v2019.2): development, deployment and demonstration T. Sun & S. Grimmond 10.5194/gmd-12-2781-2019
- Integrating fault kinematics into implicit 3D modelling of fault networks L. Grose et al. 10.1080/22020586.2019.12072997
- Automated Monte Carlo-based quantification and updating of geological uncertainty with borehole data (AutoBEL v1.0) Z. Yin et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-651-2020
- The role of geological models and uncertainties in safety assessments M. Bjorge et al. 10.1007/s12665-022-10305-z
- Spatial agents for geological surface modelling E. de Kemp 10.5194/gmd-14-6661-2021
- Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models H. Olierook et al. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.015
- 2.5-D Deep Learning Inversion of LWD and Deep-Sensing EM Measurements Across Formations With Dipping Faults K. Noh et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3128965
- Virtual Reality Modelling of Garden Geography and Geology Based on 3D Modelling Technology Q. Zhang 10.1088/1742-6596/1952/2/022053
- A probabilistic geologic model of the Krafla geothermal system constrained by gravimetric data S. Scott et al. 10.1186/s40517-019-0143-6
- Vector-based three-dimensional (3D) well-path optimization assisted by geological modelling and borehole-log extraction M. Almedallah et al. 10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100053
- A geostatistical implicit modeling framework for uncertainty quantification of 3D geo-domain boundaries: Application to lithological domains from a porphyry copper deposit F. Fouedjio et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104931
6 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Certified reduced basis method in geosciences D. Degen et al. 10.1007/s10596-019-09916-6
- Implicit Structural Modeling by Minimization of the Bending Energy with Moving Least Squares Functions J. Renaudeau et al. 10.1007/s11004-019-09789-6
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Uncertainty. Toward a Unified, Data-Driven Framework for Uncertainty Characterization in Hydrogeology F. Heße et al. 10.3389/feart.2019.00118
- Boundary simulation – a hierarchical approach for multiple categories F. Amarante et al. 10.1080/25726838.2021.1889295
- Integration of geoscientific uncertainty into geophysical inversion by means of local gradient regularization J. Giraud et al. 10.5194/se-10-193-2019
- Geometric Element Preserving Reconstruction of a Geological Surface S. Yu et al. 10.1007/s13369-021-05536-4
Latest update: 09 Jun 2023
Short summary
GemPy is an open-source Python-based 3-D structural geological modeling software, which allows the implicit (i.e. automatic) creation of complex geological models from interface and orientation data. GemPy is implemented in the programming language Python, making use of a highly efficient underlying library, Theano, for efficient code generation that performs automatic differentiation. This enables the link to probabilistic machine-learning and Bayesian inference frameworks.
GemPy is an open-source Python-based 3-D structural geological modeling software, which allows...