Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4489-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4489-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
09 Nov 2018
Development and technical paper |
| 09 Nov 2018
| 09 Nov 2018
On the impact of recent developments of the LMDz atmospheric general circulation model on the simulation of CO2 transport
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Orme des Merisiers, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
Frédéric Chevallier
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Orme des Merisiers, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
Anne Cozic
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Orme des Merisiers, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
Xin Lin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Orme des Merisiers, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
Philippe Bousquet
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Orme des Merisiers, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
Viewed
Total article views: 4,717 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Jul 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,536 | 1,100 | 81 | 4,717 | 234 | 107 | 92 |
- HTML: 3,536
- PDF: 1,100
- XML: 81
- Total: 4,717
- Supplement: 234
- BibTeX: 107
- EndNote: 92
Total article views: 3,880 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Nov 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,034 | 772 | 74 | 3,880 | 234 | 99 | 85 |
- HTML: 3,034
- PDF: 772
- XML: 74
- Total: 3,880
- Supplement: 234
- BibTeX: 99
- EndNote: 85
Total article views: 837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Jul 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502 | 328 | 7 | 837 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 502
- PDF: 328
- XML: 7
- Total: 837
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,717 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,318 with geography defined
and 399 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,880 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,518 with geography defined
and 362 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 800 with geography defined
and 37 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Downhill and uphill diffusion of gases with temperature inversions in the atmosphere V. Dung & T. Tuan 10.1007/s12648-021-02167-1
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- How Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Drive Surface Variability of N2O and CFC‐11 D. Ruiz et al. 10.1029/2020JD033979
- Toward High‐Resolution Global Atmospheric Inverse Modeling Using Graphics Accelerators F. Chevallier et al. 10.1029/2022GL102135
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Local Anomalies in the Column‐Averaged Dry Air Mole Fractions of Carbon Dioxide Across the Globe During the First Months of the Coronavirus Recession F. Chevallier et al. 10.1029/2020GL090244
- Weak sensitivity of the terrestrial water budget to global soil texture maps in the ORCHIDEE land surface model S. Tafasca et al. 10.5194/hess-24-3753-2020
- Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
- Approximation of multi-year time series of XCO2 concentrations using satellite observations and statistical interpolation methods W. Wefers et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106965
- Multi-year observations reveal a larger than expected autumn respiration signal across northeast Eurasia B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4779-2022
- Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Modelling CO<sub>2</sub> weather – why horizontal resolution matters A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019
- Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
- Evaluation of earth system model and atmospheric inversion using total column CO2 observations from GOSAT and OCO-2 P. Patra et al. 10.1186/s40645-021-00420-z
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- The Canadian atmospheric transport model for simulating greenhouse gas evolution on regional scales: GEM–MACH–GHG v.137-reg J. Kim et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-269-2020
- Multi‐Season Evaluation of CO2 Weather in OCO‐2 MIP Models L. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021JD035457
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
- National CO2budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Contrasting Regional Carbon Cycle Responses to Seasonal Climate Anomalies Across the East‐West Divide of Temperate North America B. Byrne et al. 10.1029/2020GB006598
- Comparison of CAMS Data on CO2 with Measurements in Peterhof G. Nerobelov et al. 10.1134/S102485602106018X
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
- Optimizing 4 years of CO2 biospheric fluxes from OCO-2 and in situ data in TM5: fire emissions from GFED and inferred from MOPITT CO data H. Peiro et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15817-2022
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Downhill and uphill diffusion of gases with temperature inversions in the atmosphere V. Dung & T. Tuan 10.1007/s12648-021-02167-1
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions F. Chevallier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14233-2019
- How Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Drive Surface Variability of N2O and CFC‐11 D. Ruiz et al. 10.1029/2020JD033979
- Toward High‐Resolution Global Atmospheric Inverse Modeling Using Graphics Accelerators F. Chevallier et al. 10.1029/2022GL102135
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- Local Anomalies in the Column‐Averaged Dry Air Mole Fractions of Carbon Dioxide Across the Globe During the First Months of the Coronavirus Recession F. Chevallier et al. 10.1029/2020GL090244
- Weak sensitivity of the terrestrial water budget to global soil texture maps in the ORCHIDEE land surface model S. Tafasca et al. 10.5194/hess-24-3753-2020
- Global Carbon Budget 2020 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
- Approximation of multi-year time series of XCO2 concentrations using satellite observations and statistical interpolation methods W. Wefers et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106965
- Multi-year observations reveal a larger than expected autumn respiration signal across northeast Eurasia B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/bg-19-4779-2022
- Global Carbon Budget 2022 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
- Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling M. Remaud et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
- Modelling CO<sub>2</sub> weather – why horizontal resolution matters A. Agustí-Panareda et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019
- Global Carbon Budget 2021 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
- Evaluation of earth system model and atmospheric inversion using total column CO2 observations from GOSAT and OCO-2 P. Patra et al. 10.1186/s40645-021-00420-z
- Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach F. Maignan et al. 10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021
- The Canadian atmospheric transport model for simulating greenhouse gas evolution on regional scales: GEM–MACH–GHG v.137-reg J. Kim et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-269-2020
- Multi‐Season Evaluation of CO2 Weather in OCO‐2 MIP Models L. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021JD035457
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Global Carbon Budget 2019 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
- National CO2budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Contrasting Regional Carbon Cycle Responses to Seasonal Climate Anomalies Across the East‐West Divide of Temperate North America B. Byrne et al. 10.1029/2020GB006598
- Comparison of CAMS Data on CO2 with Measurements in Peterhof G. Nerobelov et al. 10.1134/S102485602106018X
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Global Carbon Budget 2023 P. Friedlingstein et al. 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
- Optimizing 4 years of CO2 biospheric fluxes from OCO-2 and in situ data in TM5: fire emissions from GFED and inferred from MOPITT CO data H. Peiro et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15817-2022
Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Short summary
We compare several versions of a global atmospheric transport model for the simulation of CO2. The representation of subgrid-scale processes modulates the interhemispheric gradient and the amplitude of the seasonal cycle in the Northern Hemisphere. It has the largest impact over Brazil. Refining the horizontal resolution improves the simulation near emission hotspots or along the coastlines. The sensitivities to the land surface model and to the increase in vertical resolution are marginal.
We compare several versions of a global atmospheric transport model for the simulation of CO2....
