Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2009-2018
Model description paper
 | 
04 Jun 2018
Model description paper |  | 04 Jun 2018

Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): a process-based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil

Fabiola Murguia-Flores, Sandra Arndt, Anita L. Ganesan, Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo, and Edward R. C. Hornibrook

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Fabiola Murguia-Flores on behalf of the Authors (13 Sep 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Oct 2017) by Tomomichi Kato
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (19 Oct 2017)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (02 Nov 2017)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (10 Feb 2018)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (28 Feb 2018) by Tomomichi Kato
AR by Fabiola Murguia-Flores on behalf of the Authors (26 Mar 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (17 Apr 2018) by Tomomichi Kato
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (22 Apr 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (03 May 2018)
ED: Publish as is (07 May 2018) by Tomomichi Kato
AR by Fabiola Murguia-Flores on behalf of the Authors (08 May 2018)  Manuscript 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Soil bacteria known as methanotrophs are the only biological sink for atmospheric methane (CH4). Their activity depends on climatic and edaphic conditions, thus varies spatially and temporarily. Based on this, we developed a model (MeMo v1.0) to assess the global CH4 consumption by soils. The global CH4 uptake was 33.5 Tg CH4 yr-1 for 1990–2009, with an increasing trend of 0.1 Tg CH4 yr-2. The regional analysis proved that warm and semiarid regions represent the most efficient CH4 sink.