Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.240 IF 5.240
  • IF 5-year value: 5.768 IF 5-year
    5.768
  • CiteScore value: 8.9 CiteScore
    8.9
  • SNIP value: 1.713 SNIP 1.713
  • IPP value: 5.53 IPP 5.53
  • SJR value: 3.18 SJR 3.18
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
GMD | Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1873–1886, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1873-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1873–1886, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1873-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 15 May 2018

Methods for assessment of models | 15 May 2018

The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models

Julian Koch et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,228 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,136 1,005 87 3,228 51 69
  • HTML: 2,136
  • PDF: 1,005
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 3,228
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,962 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,940 with geography defined and 22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 10 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Our work addresses a key challenge in earth system modelling: how to optimally exploit the information contained in satellite remote sensing observations in the calibration of such models. For this we thoroughly test a number of measures that quantify the fit between an observed and a simulated spatial pattern. We acknowledge the difficulties associated with such a comparison and suggest using measures that regard multiple aspects of spatial information, i.e. magnitude and variability.
Our work addresses a key challenge in earth system modelling: how to optimally exploit the...
Citation