Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3567-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3567-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 9
Development and technical paper
 | 
28 Sep 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 28 Sep 2017

Calibrating climate models using inverse methods: case studies with HadAM3, HadAM3P and HadCM3

Simon F. B. Tett, Kuniko Yamazaki, Michael J. Mineter, Coralia Cartis, and Nathan Eizenberg

Viewed

Total article views: 3,248 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,185 946 117 3,248 129 156
  • HTML: 2,185
  • PDF: 946
  • XML: 117
  • Total: 3,248
  • BibTeX: 129
  • EndNote: 156
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,248 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,052 with geography defined and 196 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The paper shows it is possible to automatically calibrate the parameters in the atmospheric component of two climate models. The resulting atmosphere–ocean models are often, but not always, stable and realistic. The computational cost to do this is feasible. The implications are that it is possible to generate multiple configurations of a single model with different parameter values but which all look similar to the standard model and that the techniques could be used to calibrate other models.
Read more