Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2221-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2221-2017
Development and technical paper
 | 
16 Jun 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 16 Jun 2017

rpe v5: an emulator for reduced floating-point precision in large numerical simulations

Andrew Dawson and Peter D. Düben

Related authors

Representing model uncertainty for global atmospheric CO2 flux inversions using ECMWF-IFS-46R1
Joe R. McNorton, Nicolas Bousserez, Anna Agustí-Panareda, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Margarita Choulga, Andrew Dawson, Richard Engelen, Zak Kipling, and Simon Lang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2297–2313, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2297-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2297-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
An overview of cloud–radiation denial experiments for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1
Bryce E. Harrop, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, William K. M. Lau, Kyu-Myong Kim, Brian Medeiros, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Bosong Zhang, and Balwinder Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3111–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, 2024
Short summary
The computational and energy cost of simulation and storage for climate science: lessons from CMIP6
Mario C. Acosta, Sergi Palomas, Stella V. Paronuzzi Ticco, Gladys Utrera, Joachim Biercamp, Pierre-Antoine Bretonniere, Reinhard Budich, Miguel Castrillo, Arnaud Caubel, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Italo Epicoco, Uwe Fladrich, Sylvie Joussaume, Alok Kumar Gupta, Bryan Lawrence, Philippe Le Sager, Grenville Lister, Marie-Pierre Moine, Jean-Christophe Rioual, Sophie Valcke, Niki Zadeh, and Venkatramani Balaji
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Subgrid-scale variability of cloud ice in the ICON-AES 1.3.00
Sabine Doktorowski, Jan Kretzschmar, Johannes Quaas, Marc Salzmann, and Odran Sourdeval
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3099–3110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024, 2024
Short summary
INFERNO-peat v1.0.0: a representation of northern high-latitude peat fires in the JULES-INFERNO global fire model
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
The 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled land data assimilation system for E3SM version 2
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, Samson M. Hagos, and Shixuan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model, in: Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, edited by: Chang, J., Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London, 17, 173–265, 1977.
Berger, S. A. and Stamatakis, A.: Accuracy and Performance of Single versus Double Precision Artihmetics for Maximum Liklihood Phylogeny Reconstruction, in: Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics: 8th International Conference, PPAM 2009, Wroclaw, Poland, 13–16 September, 2009, 270–279, 2010.
Cooper, F. C. and Zanna, L.: Optimisation of an Idealised Ocean Model, Stochastic Parameterisation of Sub-Grid Eddies, Ocean Model., 88, 38–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.12.014, 2015.
Dawson, A. and Düben, P. D.: aopp-pred/rpe: v5.0.0, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.154483, 2016.
Dawson, A. and Düben, P. D.: aopp-pred/rpe-examples: gmd-2016-247, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.803274, 2017.
Download
Short summary
Weather and climate models must become more efficient if they continue growing in complexity. One option for reducing computational cost is to reduce numerical precision. We present a tool that allows users to study how models perform with reduced numerical precision. The tool is applied to a geophysical use case where precision is heavily reduced while maintaining suitable accuracy. The tool can be applied to other models to determine whether they can be made more computationally efficient.