Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2221-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2221-2017
Development and technical paper
 | 
16 Jun 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 16 Jun 2017

rpe v5: an emulator for reduced floating-point precision in large numerical simulations

Andrew Dawson and Peter D. Düben

Related authors

Representing model uncertainty for global atmospheric CO2 flux inversions using ECMWF-IFS-46R1
Joe R. McNorton, Nicolas Bousserez, Anna Agustí-Panareda, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Margarita Choulga, Andrew Dawson, Richard Engelen, Zak Kipling, and Simon Lang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2297–2313, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2297-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2297-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0)
Mengjie Han, Qing Zhao, Xili Wang, Ying-Ping Wang, Philippe Ciais, Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Lei Zhu, Zhe Zhao, Zhixuan Guo, Chen Wang, Wei Zhuang, Fengchang Wu, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4871–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hector V3.2.0: functionality and performance of a reduced-complexity climate model
Kalyn Dorheim, Skylar Gering, Robert Gieseke, Corinne Hartin, Leeya Pressburger, Alexey N. Shiklomanov, Steven J. Smith, Claudia Tebaldi, Dawn L. Woodard, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4855–4869, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of PM2.5 and its components over China
Fangxuan Ren, Jintai Lin, Chenghao Xu, Jamiu A. Adeniran, Jingxu Wang, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Larry W. Horowitz, Steven T. Turnock, Naga Oshima, Jie Zhang, Susanne Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Pierre Nabat, David Neubauer, Gary Strand, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Toshihiko Takemura
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4821–4836, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessment of a tiling energy budget approach in a land surface model, ORCHIDEE-MICT (r8205)
Yi Xi, Chunjing Qiu, Yuan Zhang, Dan Zhu, Shushi Peng, Gustaf Hugelius, Jinfeng Chang, Elodie Salmon, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4727–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4727-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections
Georgia Lazoglou, Theo Economou, Christina Anagnostopoulou, George Zittis, Anna Tzyrkalli, Pantelis Georgiades, and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4689–4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model, in: Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, edited by: Chang, J., Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London, 17, 173–265, 1977.
Berger, S. A. and Stamatakis, A.: Accuracy and Performance of Single versus Double Precision Artihmetics for Maximum Liklihood Phylogeny Reconstruction, in: Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics: 8th International Conference, PPAM 2009, Wroclaw, Poland, 13–16 September, 2009, 270–279, 2010.
Cooper, F. C. and Zanna, L.: Optimisation of an Idealised Ocean Model, Stochastic Parameterisation of Sub-Grid Eddies, Ocean Model., 88, 38–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.12.014, 2015.
Dawson, A. and Düben, P. D.: aopp-pred/rpe: v5.0.0, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.154483, 2016.
Dawson, A. and Düben, P. D.: aopp-pred/rpe-examples: gmd-2016-247, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.803274, 2017.
Download
Short summary
Weather and climate models must become more efficient if they continue growing in complexity. One option for reducing computational cost is to reduce numerical precision. We present a tool that allows users to study how models perform with reduced numerical precision. The tool is applied to a geophysical use case where precision is heavily reduced while maintaining suitable accuracy. The tool can be applied to other models to determine whether they can be made more computationally efficient.