the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bias correction of multi-ensemble simulations from the HAPPI model intercomparison project
Abstract. Prior to using climate data as input for sectoral impact models, statistical bias correction is commonly applied to correct climate model data for systematic deviations. Different approaches have been adopted for this purpose, however the most common are those based on the transfer functions, generated to map the distribution of the simulated historical data to that of the observations. Here, we present results of a novel bias correction method, developed for Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2b (ISIMIP2b) and applied to outputs of different GCMs generated within the HAPPI (Half A degree Additional warming, Projections, Prognosis and Impacts) project. We have employed various analysis measures including mean seasonal differences, ensemble variability, annual cycles, extreme indices as well as a global hydrological model to assess the performance of ISIMIP2b bias correction technique. The results indicate substantial improvements after the application of bias correction when compared against observational data. Moreover, the extreme indices as well as output of global hydrological model also reveal a marked improvement. At the same time, the ensemble spread of the original data is preserved after the application of bias correction. We find that the bias corrected HAPPI data can provide a reliable basis for sectoral climate impact projections.
- Preprint
(14947 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(67272 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'How does this article extend the state-of-the-art?', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2018
- AC1: 'Response to Referee's comment', Fahad Saeed, 16 Oct 2018
-
EC1: 'Editor decision', James Annan, 09 Oct 2018
- AC2: 'Response to Editor's comment', Fahad Saeed, 16 Oct 2018
-
RC1: 'How does this article extend the state-of-the-art?', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2018
- AC1: 'Response to Referee's comment', Fahad Saeed, 16 Oct 2018
-
EC1: 'Editor decision', James Annan, 09 Oct 2018
- AC2: 'Response to Editor's comment', Fahad Saeed, 16 Oct 2018
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,342 | 490 | 85 | 1,917 | 238 | 120 | 117 |
- HTML: 1,342
- PDF: 490
- XML: 85
- Total: 1,917
- Supplement: 238
- BibTeX: 120
- EndNote: 117
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- 1.5°C Hotspots: Climate Hazards, Vulnerabilities, and Impacts C. Schleussner et al. 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025835
- Regional disparities in the exposure to heat-related mortality risk under 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming Y. Fan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5adf
- Water availability in Pakistan from Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalayan watersheds at 1.5 °C and 2 °C Paris Agreement targets S. Hasson et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.06.010
- Deadly Heat Stress to Become Commonplace Across South Asia Already at 1.5°C of Global Warming F. Saeed et al. 10.1029/2020GL091191