254 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Using R packages 'tmap', 'raster' and 'ggmap' for cartographic visualization: An example of dem-based terrain modelling of Italy, Apennine Peninsula P. Lemenkova https://doi.org/10.5937/zrgfub2068099L
2. Land surface diversity: A geomorphodiversity index of Italy M. Burnelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5679
3. Geostatistical Modeling to Capture Seismic‐Shaking Patterns From Earthquake‐Induced Landslides L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005056
4. A python system for regional landslide susceptibility assessment by integrating machine learning models and its application Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21542
5. New and existing settlements built on hillslopes weakened by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03492-1
6. Rockfall impacts on the road network of the Metropolitan Area of Rome: a risk prioritisation framework for decision-makers G. Marmoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106182
7. Study on the spatial distribution pattern of correlation between surface deformation and reservoir water level in the Three Gorges Reservoir area H. Sang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02356-z
8. Assessing locations susceptible to shallow landslide initiation during prolonged intense rainfall in the Lares, Utuado, and Naranjito municipalities of Puerto Rico R. Baum et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1579-2024
9. Comparative analysis of slope and grid units for co-seismic landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning methods T. Bhattarai & N. Bhandary https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00489-3
10. Preparing first-time slope failures hazard maps: from pixel-based to slope unit-based G. Domènech et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01279-4
11. Leveraging artificial intelligence to quantify slope rainfall sensitivity for refining regional landslide rainfall thresholds Y. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108260
12. Administrative boundaries and urban areas in Italy: A perspective from scaling laws M. Alvioli https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103906
13. Framework for susceptibility analysis of layered rock slopes considering the dimensions of the mapping units and geological data resolution at various map scales C. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.004
14. Impact of landslide on geoheritage: Opportunities through integration, geomorphological classification and machine learning M. Al’Afif et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.05.002
15. Interpretable machine learning models and decision-making mechanisms for landslide hazard assessment under different rainfall conditions H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126582
16. Physically based morphostructural land surface segmentation: Case of the Alps and Western Carpathians P. Bandura et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12847
17. Dynamic Changes in Land Subsidence Following Extreme Precipitation Event: A Case Study of Zhengzhou B. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.70278
18. Mapping debris flow susceptibility based on watershed unit and grid cell unit: a comparison study S. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1604572
19. Improved landslide susceptibility assessment: A new negative sample collection strategy and a comparative analysis of zoning methods J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112948
20. The influence of the inventory on the determination of the rainfall-induced shallow landslides susceptibility using generalized additive models M. Bordoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104630
21. The dynamic threat from landslides following large continental earthquakes K. Arrell et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308444
22. Vegetation-induced modifications in hydrological processes and the consequential dynamic effects of slope stability Z. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108793
23. Rapid landslide risk zoning toward multi-slope units of the Neikuihui tribe for preliminary disaster management C. Chung & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1777-2022
24. PHyL v1.0: A parallel, flexible, and advanced software for hydrological and slope stability modeling at a regional scale G. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105882
25. Joint modeling of co-seismic landslide occurrence and size with spatial dependence K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07875-z
26. Landslide Mapping and Susceptibility Assessment in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Nujiang River (2017–2025) Using Satellite Embedding and Multidimensional Environmental Factors W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18111854
27. Semi-automated classification of layered rock slopes using digital elevation model and geological map H. Shang et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0526
28. Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) based on different boosting and hyperparameter optimization algorithms: A case of Wanzhou District, China D. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.09.037
29. Towards physics-informed neural networks for landslide prediction A. Dahal & L. Lombardo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107852
30. Geohazard risk assessment model based on deep neural network R. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109029
31. Unraveling the controls of unstable slopes in mining-affected coalfields through InSAR observations and multivariate modeling P. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105089
32. Slope-specific rainfall thresholds for regional landslide early warning systems X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108249
33. Uncertainty analysis of non-landslide sample selection in landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models Z. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.007
34. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Comparing GIS-Based Bivariate Methods: A Focus on the Geomorphological Implication of the Statistical Results L. Coco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214280
35. A thermo-hydro-mechanical approach to soil slope stability under climate change G. Scaringi & M. Loche https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108108
36. INSPIRE standards as a framework for artificial intelligence applications: a landslide example G. Roberti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3455-2020
37. Rockfall Magnitude-Frequency Relationship Based on Multi-Source Data from Monitoring and Inventory M. Janeras et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15081981
38. The influence of DEM spatial resolution on landslide susceptibility mapping in the Baxie River basin, NW China Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03899-9
39. Object-based image analysis for extracting regional slope units and its application Y. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01408-1
40. Coupling hydrological, geotechnical and machine learning models to enhance landslide prediction for an early warning system: application to Upper Garonne River Basin, Pyrenees, Spain F. Asurza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02685-7
41. Regional earthquake-induced landslide assessments for use in seismic risk analyses of distributed gas infrastructure systems O. Ojomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107664
42. Distribution-agnostic landslide hazard modelling via Graph Transformers G. Belvederesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106231
43. Space-time modeling of cascading hazards: Chaining wildfires, rainfall and landslide events through machine learning M. Di Napoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108452
44. A data-knowledge-model synergistic reasoning framework for landslide identification Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115404
45. Loess terrain segmentation from digital elevation models based on the region growth method H. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2017.1342215
46. Mapping the susceptibility of rainfall and earthquake triggered landslides along China–Nepal highways K. Gnyawali et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01583-2
47. The (f)utility to account for pre-failure topography in data-driven landslide susceptibility modelling S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107041
48. Physics-informed synergy regional co-seismic landslide size prediction: A novel data-driven approach for improved reliability and interpretability B. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2026.102297
49. Incorporating Effects of Slope Units and Sliding Areas into Seismically Induced Landslide Risk Modeling in Tectonically Active Mountainous Areas H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183517
50. An adaptive framework for refining rainfall thresholds based on geoenvironmental similarities to enhance shallow landslide prediction Z. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2026.2677175
51. An enhanced rainfall-induced landslide catalogue in Italy M. Brunetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04551-6
52. Machine learning and clustering for supporting the identification of active landslides at national scale C. Medici et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104608
53. A mechanistic approach to include climate change and unplanned urban sprawl in landslide susceptibility maps E. Bozzolan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159412
54. Enhancing social vulnerability assessment with energy resilience: A comprehensive study of the Netherlands W. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105251
55. Impacts from cascading multi-hazards using hypergraphs: a case study from the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal A. Dunant et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-267-2025
56. Development of a region-partitioning method for debris flow susceptibility mapping S. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6497-1
57. Modelling post‐earthquake cascading hazards: Changing patterns of landslide runout following the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal M. Kincey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5501
58. Causative environment-informed active landslide detection with InSAR monitoring: Empowering reservoir slope hazard management S. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.105079
59. Spatiotemporal clustering for landslide hazard prediction revealed by the path-dependent perspective B. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2026.03.017
60. Implementing landslide path dependency in landslide susceptibility modelling J. Samia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1024-y
61. Landform classification: a high-performing mapping unit partitioning tool for landslide susceptibility assessment—a test in the Imera River basin (northern Sicily, Italy) C. Martinello et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01781-8
62. Integrated risk assessment of landslide in karst terrains: Advancing landslides management in Beiliu City, China M. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104046
63. A SHAP-enhanced XGBoost model for interpretable prediction of coseismic landslides H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.07.013
64. Susceptibility Assessment for Landslide Initiated along Power Transmission Lines S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13245068
65. An improved time series SAR interferometry (TSInSAR) for investigating earthquake-induced active unstable slopes (AUS) in Pakistan N. Shahzad & X. Ding https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2024.2391106
66. Rockfall susceptibility and network-ranked susceptibility along the Italian railway M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106301
67. 基于知识图谱的滑坡易发性评价文献综述及研究进展 F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2023.058
68. Analyzing the posterior predictive capability and usability of landslide susceptibility maps: a case of Kerala, India T. Pareek et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02389-4
69. Study on landslide hazard risk in Wenzhou based on slope units and machine learning approaches D. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91669-7
70. A New Parameter-Free Slope Unit Division Method That Integrates Terrain Factors P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311279
71. Space-time explainable modelling of regional hillslope deformation, an example from the Tibetan Plateau J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114924
72. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping along a Rapidly Uplifting River Valley of the Upper Jinsha River, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau, China X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071730
73. Identification of the Dominant Rainfall Index and Evolution of Multi-Factor Driving Mechanisms for Landslide Activity in Hong Kong (1990–2024) J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051430
74. Multi-Temporal Landslide Inventory-Based Statistical Susceptibility Modeling Associated With the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake, Sichuan, China L. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.858635
75. Displacement prediction of slow-moving landslides using InSAR and ensemble regression models based on slope units S. Cobos-Mora et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07829-5
76. Comprehensive risk mapping and management of rainfall-induced slope failures in urbanizing subtropical regions F. Yang & M. Hasan https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49114-w
77. Optimizing slope unit-based landslide susceptibility mapping using the priority-flood flow direction algorithm G. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107657
78. Assessing the influence of temperature on slope stability in a temperate climate: A nationwide spatial probability analysis in Italy M. Loche & G. Scaringi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106217
79. Slope unit-based evaluation of climate change impacts on landslide susceptibility in the Nepal Himalaya T. Bhattarai & N. Bhandary https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2649615
80. From scenario-based seismic hazard to scenario-based landslide hazard: fast-forwarding to the future via statistical simulations L. Lombardo & H. Tanyas https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02020-1
81. Exploring available landslide inventories for susceptibility analysis in Gipuzkoa province (Spain) T. Bornaetxea et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06103-w
82. Transformer, more than meets the eye: A deep learning approach to integrate rainfall time-series in multi-type landslide probability modelling R. Rani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2026.102295
83. Stacking ensemble learning-driven risk assessment framework of rockfall in karst terrains: A case study in Guilin, China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.12.027
84. The Sustainable Development of Forest Food W. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013092
85. Efficient large-scale vegetation mapping at the formation level using multi-source data: A case study in Beijing, China J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.04.021
86. Seismically Induced Rockfall Hazard from Ground Motion Scenarios in Italy M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4156514
87. Long and short-term perspectives on space–time landslide modelling T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104694
88. The world's second-largest, recorded landslide event: Lessons learnt from the landslides triggered during and after the 2018 Mw 7.5 Papua New Guinea earthquake H. Tanyaş et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106504
89. Mapping Susceptibility With Open-Source Tools: A New Plugin for QGIS G. Titti et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.842425
90. Landslide hazard and susceptibility maps derived from satellite and remote sensing data using limit equilibrium analysis and machine learning model B. Dashbold et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05671-7
91. Generation of Homogeneous Slope Units Using a Novel Object-Oriented Multi-Resolution Segmentation Method Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233422
92. A new digital lithological map of Italy at the 1:100 000 scale for geomechanical modelling F. Bucci et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4129-2022
93. Evaluating the use of a coordinate-based tensor-product for addressing spatial autocorrelation in shallow landslide susceptibility modelling L. Pompili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-026-03283-2
94. The role of morphology in the spatial distribution of short-duration rainfall extremes in Italy P. Mazzoglio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1659-2022
95. Space-time data-driven modeling of precipitation-induced shallow landslides in South Tyrol, Italy M. Moreno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169166
96. Is there difference in landslide susceptibility model based on explainable artificial intelligence from the perspective of slope units with different scales? J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111701
97. Dynamic Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in the Yalong River Alpine Gorge Region Integrating InSAR-Derived Deformation Velocity Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183210
98. A global slope unit-based method for the near real-time prediction of earthquake-induced landslides H. Tanyas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.022
99. Chrono-validation of near-real-time landslide susceptibility models via plug-in statistical simulations L. Lombardo & H. Tanyas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105818
100. An updated landslide susceptibility model and a log-Gaussian Cox process extension for Scotland E. Bryce et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02368-9
101. Detecting large-scale landslides in high-altitude permafrost region along the Qinghai-Tibet engineering corridor using InSAR and slope unit-based clustering J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2026.2626781
102. Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Different Slope Units Based on BP Neural Network J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9923775
103. Unveiling the amplifying impact: Anthropogenic activities and the two-fold surge in landslides in the Lesser Himalayas S. Kaushal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108771
104. Integration of Spatial Probability and Size in Slope-Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study L. Li & H. Lan https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218055
105. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models P. Reichenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
106. Extreme gradient boosting with Shapley Additive Explanations for landslide susceptibility at slope unit and hydrological response unit scales A. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102081
107. Rockfall susceptibility mapping from topography perspective combing slope units and physical model-based negative sample strategy in the Yangtze Three Gorges F. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110136
108. Climate change, social environment, health, and urban inequality: Developing a novel adaptive evaluation framework N. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106443
109. Landslide size matters: A new data-driven, spatial prototype L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106288
110. Advancements in Technologies and Methodologies of Machine Learning in Landslide Susceptibility Research: Current Trends and Future Directions Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219639
111. From ground motion simulations to landslide occurrence prediction A. Dahal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108898
112. SHAP-PDP hybrid interpretation of decision-making mechanism of machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Wushan District, China D. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.06.005
113. Zonation-based landslide hazard assessment using artificial neural networks in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Z. Jianqiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.927102
114. Rockfall susceptibility along Pasang Lhamu and Galchhi-Rasuwagadhi highways, Rasuwa, Central Nepal B. Pokharel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03174-8
115. Insights into spatial differential characteristics of landslide susceptibility from sub-region to whole-region cased by northeast Chongqing, China R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2190858
116. On the prediction of landslide occurrences and sizes via Hierarchical Neural Networks Q. Aguilera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02215-0
117. Global Landslide Finder: Detecting the Time and Place of Landslides with Dense Earth Observation Time Series M. Aufaristama et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5030039
118. A new slope unit extraction method based on improved marked watershed L. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823204070
119. The damability function: a probabilistic approach to regional landslide dam susceptibility analysis applied to the Oregon Coast Range, USA P. Morgan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1745-2026
120. Quantitatively detecting ground surface changes of slope failure caused by heavy rain using ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 data: a case study in Japan X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73372-1
121. Landslide mapping using object-based image analysis and open source tools P. Amatya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106000
122. Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment G. Amato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105237
123. Integration of Remotely Sensed Soil Sealing Data in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping T. Luti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091486
124. Automatic Extraction for Land Parcels Based on Multi-Scale Segmentation F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020158
125. Dynamic path-dependent landslide susceptibility modelling J. Samia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-271-2020
126. Application of different watershed units to debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study of Northeast China J. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1118160
127. Towards Sustainable Heritage Conservation: A Hybrid Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Framework in Japan’s UNESCO Mountain Villages A. Bassem et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010237
128. Coseismic Landslide Area Prediction Using Generalised Additive Model: A Case Study of the 2013 Minxian Earthquake X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.70041
129. Point process-based modeling of multiple debris flow landslides using INLA: an application to the 2009 Messina disaster L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1518-0
130. Unified landslide hazard assessment using hurdle models: a case study in the Island of Dominica E. Bryce et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02239-6
131. An Automatic Method for Delimiting Deformation Area in InSAR Based on HNSW-DBSCAN Clustering Algorithm J. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174287
132. Optimizing landslide susceptibility zonation: Effects of DEM spatial resolution and slope unit delineation on logistic regression models R. Schlögel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.018
133. Space-time landslide predictive modelling L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103318
134. The propagation of inventory-based positional errors into statistical landslide susceptibility models S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2729-2016
135. Modeling the area of co-seismic landslides via data-driven models: The Kaikōura example M. Moreno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107121
136. Efficient and automatic extraction of slope units based on multi-scale segmentation method for landslide assessments F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01756-9
137. An ensemble neural network approach for space–time landslide predictive modelling J. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104037
138. Multi-hazards assessment in Türkiye following large earthquakes E. Mills et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106224
139. Volume Estimation of Landslide Affected Soil Moisture Using TRIGRS: A Case Study of Longxi River Small Watershed in Wenchuan Earthquake Zone, China T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010071
140. Different Approaches to Use Morphometric Attributes in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Meso-Scale Spatial Units: A Case Study in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) V. Canavesi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111826
141. Impact of sampling for landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable machine learning models B. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03980-8
142. An updated version of the SZ-plugin: From space to space–time data-driven modeling in QGIS G. Titti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104679
143. Hazard zoning for spatial planning using GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment: a new hybrid integrated data-driven and knowledge-based model Q. Ashournejad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4236-0
144. Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357
145. How can statistical and artificial intelligence approaches predict piping erosion susceptibility? M. Hosseinalizadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.396
146. Landslide susceptibility mapping of Darjeeling Himalaya, India using index of entropy (IOE) model S. Mondal & S. Mandal https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0248-9
147. A novel QLattice‐based whitening machine learning model of landslide susceptibility mapping D. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5675
148. PSO-SLIC algorithm: A novel automated method for the generation of high-homogeneity slope units using DEM data Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109367
149. High-resolution Bayesian mapping of landslide hazard with unobserved trigger event T. Opitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1214/21-AOAS1561
150. Automatic landslide prioritization at regional scale through PS-InSAR cluster analysis and socio-economic impacts M. Zocchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101414
151. Identification and Extraction of Geomorphological Features of Landslides Using Slope Units for Landslide Analysis K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040274
152. Assessment of earthquake-induced landslide inventories and susceptibility maps using slope unit-based logistic regression and geospatial statistics B. Pokharel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00780-y
153. Space–time landslide hazard modeling via Ensemble Neural Networks A. Dahal et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-823-2024
154. Mapping Landslides on EO Data: Performance of Deep Learning Models vs. Traditional Machine Learning Models N. Prakash et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030346
155. When Time Prevails: The Perils of Overlooking Temporal Landscape Evolution in Landslide Susceptibility Predictions J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17101752
156. National-scale assessment of railways exposure to rapid flow-like landslides I. Marchesini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107474
157. Representative profile model: a new physically-based model using slope unit for hazard assessment of colluvial landslides at large scale X. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04677-2
158. Aras Nehri havzasında lojistik regresyon yöntemiyle kayma ve akma tip heyelan duyarlılığı değerlendirmesi M. Cihangir https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1475065
159. Is higher resolution always better? A comparison of open-access DEMs for optimized slope unit delineation and regional landslide prediction M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2519-2025
160. The influence of land use and land cover change on landslide susceptibility: a case study in Zhushan Town, Xuan'en County (Hubei, China) L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2207-2019
161. A global landslide non-susceptibility map G. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107804
162. Capturing the footprints of ground motion in the spatial distribution of rainfall-induced landslides H. Tanyaş et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02238-x
163. Landslide hazard spatiotemporal prediction based on data-driven models: Estimating where, when and how large landslide may be Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103631
164. Space–Time Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Based on Data-Driven Methods Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10105-6
165. Regional early warning model for rainfall induced landslide based on slope unit in Chongqing, China S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107464
166. Parameter-free delineation of slope units and terrain subdivision of Italy M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107124
167. Temporal Variations in Landslide Distributions Following Extreme Events: Implications for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling J. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006067
168. Risk-mitigation priorities for road networks exposed to slow-moving landslides at municipal scale G. Pecoraro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106215
169. Catena matters: Enhancing landslide prediction with soil profile characteristics and explainable AI A. Achu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108599
170. Impact of antecedent rainfall and soil saturation on widespread debris flows in the northern Western Ghats during the 2021 extreme rainfall S. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04383-z
171. Improved landslide prediction by considering continuous and discrete spatial dependency Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02431-5
172. Multi-source deep-learning approach for automatic geomorphological mapping: the case of glacial moraines I. Rocamora et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2023.2292587
173. Landslide susceptibility assessment using different slope units based on the evidential belief function model Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1582716
174. Reliable assessment approach of landslide susceptibility in broad areas based on optimal slope units and negative samples involving priori knowledge X. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2159549
175. Short to long term space-time prediction of rain-induced landslides under uncertainty A. Mondini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179453
176. Modeling landslide susceptibility using alternating decision tree and support vector Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44195-024-00074-6
177. Spatial modeling of multi-hazard threat to cultural heritage sites L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105776
178. Explainable artificial intelligence in geoscience: A glimpse into the future of landslide susceptibility modeling A. Dahal & L. Lombardo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2023.105364
179. Increasing landslide susceptibility and intensity under climate change for Aotearoa New Zealand L. Dreyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46684-7
180. Mapping unit selection in landslide susceptibility prediction: A comprehensive explainable framework integrating multi-method interpretability F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-026-00897-3
181. Landslide susceptibility evaluation by spatial data-driven technology under different resolutions of the slope units X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12614-5
182. Shifting from traditional landslide occurrence modeling to scenario estimation with a “glass-box” machine learning F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175277
183. An Automated and Efficient Slope Unit Division Method Coupled with Computer Graphics and Hydrological Principles T. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094647
184. Improvement of landslide hazard assessments for regulatory zoning in France: STATE–OF–THE-ART perspectives and considerations Y. Thiery et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101562
185. Physical geomorphometry for elementary land surface segmentation and digital geomorphological mapping J. Minár et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104631
186. Comparative Assessment of Quantitative Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Feature Selection Techniques B. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15010020
187. Landslide susceptibility mapping using statistical bivariate models and their hybrid with normalized spatial-correlated scale index and weighted calibrated landslide potential model Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09603-9
188. Event-based rainfall-induced landslide inventories and rainfall thresholds for Malawi P. Niyokwiringirwa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02203-7
189. On the use of rainfall time series for regional landslide prediction by means of functional regression M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108860
190. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Terms of the Slope-Unit or Raster-Unit, Which is Better? S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1407-1
191. Effective surveyed area and its role in statistical landslide susceptibility assessments T. Bornaetxea et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2455-2018
192. Modelling InSAR-derived hillslope velocities with multivariate statistics: A first attempt to generate interpretable predictions K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113518
193. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using the Slope Unit for Southeastern Helong City, Jilin Province, China: A Comparison of ANN and SVM C. Yu & J. Chen https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12061047
194. Coherent Disaggregation and Uncertainty Quantification for Spatially Misaligned Data M. Suen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70078
195. Quantitative landslide risk assessment for Italy F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02590-z
196. Potential recognition of flash flood disasters in China’s southwestern mountainous areas considering source supply conditions H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00183-x
197. Regional susceptibility assessments with heterogeneous landslide information: Slope unit- vs. pixel-based approach L. Jacobs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107084
198. Rainfall-induced landslides assessment in the Fengjie County, Three-Gorge reservoir area, China K. Wang & S. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04691-z
199. On the estimation of landslide intensity, hazard and density via data-driven models M. Di Napoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06153-0
200. Enhancing Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Integrating Neighboring Information in Slope Units: A Spatial Logistic Regression L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234475
201. Slope-Unit Scale Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on the Random Forest Model in Deep Valley Areas H. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174245
202. A health data led approach for assessing potential health benefits of green and blue spaces: Lessons from an Irish case study O. Arodudu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118758
203. Seismically induced rockfall hazard from a physically based model and ground motion scenarios in Italy M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108652
204. Earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in Italy by means of Artificial Neural Network G. Amato et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03163-x
205. Effect of different mapping units, spatial resolutions, and machine learning algorithms on landslide susceptibility mapping at the township scale X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12148-w
206. An open event-inventory database of rainfall-induced landslides and their environmental characteristics in the eastern Black Sea region of Türkiye R. Çömert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108258
207. Ensemble learning for landslide susceptibility mapping: a review of machine learning and hybrid approaches H. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-025-01221-x
208. Literature review and bibliometric analysis on data-driven assessment of landslide susceptibility P. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7254-9
209. Spatial prediction of InSAR-derived hillslope velocities via deep learning J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04161-x
210. Seismic and environmental controls on slow-moving landslides: Insights from the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake H. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107865
211. Scale Effects in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: Integrating Slope Unit Division and SHAP-Based Interpretability in a Typical River Basin W. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131877
212. Influence of landslide inventory timespan and data selection on slope unit-based susceptibility models S. Rolain et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06092-w
213. From spatio-temporal landslide susceptibility to landslide risk forecast T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101765
214. PSLSA v2.0: An automatic Python package integrating machine learning models for regional landslide susceptibility assessment Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106367
215. A benchmark dataset and workflow for landslide susceptibility zonation M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104927
216. Effect of scale and mapping unit on landslide susceptibility mapping of Mandakini River Basin, Uttarakhand, India S. Gupta & D. Shukla https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10487-6
217. Uncertainties of landslide susceptibility prediction: influences of different study area scales and mapping unit scales F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00678-w
218. An Improved Method for the Evaluation and Local Multi-Scale Optimization of the Automatic Extraction of Slope Units in Complex Terrains Z. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143444
219. Identification of zones with high potential for biological diversity on dormant forested landslides W. Tracz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01170-w
220. An interpretable model for the susceptibility of rainfall-induced shallow landslides based on SHAP and XGBoost X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2076928
221. Slope-unit based landslide susceptibility mapping using explainable ensemble machine learning and spatial uncertainty analysis in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh M. Sayeem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2026.102091
222. Quantitative risk assessment for rainfall-induced landslides of transmission line towers: the case of Chongqing national transmission protection regions B. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105715
223. A new strategy to map landslides with a generalized convolutional neural network N. Prakash et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89015-8
224. Classifying Slope Unit by Combining Terrain Feature Lines Based on Digital Elevation Models H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010193
225. Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model D. Camilo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.08.003
226. Application of novel ensemble models to improve landslide susceptibility mapping reliability Z. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03328-8
227. A progressive framework combining unsupervised and optimized supervised learning for debris flow susceptibility assessment Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107560
228. Space-time modeling of landslide size by combining static, dynamic, and unobserved spatiotemporal factors Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.107989
229. From scenario-based seismic hazard to scenario-based landslide hazard: rewinding to the past via statistical simulations L. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01959-x
230. Investigating the landslide susceptibility assessment methods for multi-scale slope units based on SDGSAT-1 and Graph Neural Networks X. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2025.2468913
231. Topography-driven satellite imagery analysis for landslide mapping M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1458050
232. A grid-based physical model to analyze the stability of slope unit S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107887
233. Distinct Susceptibility Patterns of Active and Relict Landslides Reveal Distinct Triggers: A Case in Northwestern Turkey M. Loche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061321
234. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction: A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104700
235. Dynamic rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility: A step towards a unified forecasting system M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103593
236. KNN-GCN: A Deep Learning Approach for Slope-Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Incorporating Spatial Correlations D. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10132-3
237. Decoding dynamic landslide hazard processes for a massive refugee camp in Bangladesh D. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101172
238. Characterization and quantification of path dependency in landslide susceptibility J. Samia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.039
239. Slope Unit Maker (SUMak): an efficient and parameter-free algorithm for delineating slope units to improve landslide modeling J. Woodard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1-2024
240. A new slope unit extraction method based on terrain topology searching and vector similarity constraint for landslide analysis L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108355
241. Two-phase strategy framework for spatial prediction of landslide hazards in wide-area power linear engineering projects: the case of the China's Renewable Energy Transmission Corridors B. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114822
242. A novel image segmentation method based on spatial autocorrelation identifies A-type potassium channel clusters in the thalamus C. Dávid et al. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89361.3
243. The future of landslides’ past—a framework for assessing consecutive landsliding systems A. Temme et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01405-7
244. Surface temperature controls the pattern of post-earthquake landslide activity M. Loche et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04992-8
245. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the upper Jinsha River, south-western China: a comparison of hydrological and curvature watershed methods for slope unit classification X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01849-0
246. Geomorphological slope units of the Himalayas M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2022.2052768
247. A mechanism-informed hierarchical framework for interpreting InSAR-derived active deformation areas in regional landslide mapping W. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08273-9
248. Combining Satellite InSAR, Slope Units and Finite Element Modeling for Stability Analysis in Mining Waste Disposal Areas J. López-Vinielles et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13102008
249. A Regional-Scale Early Warning System for Rainfall-Induced Shallow Landslides Based on the Outputs of a Physically Based Model: Application to Cili County, China W. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18020168
250. Landslide susceptibility maps of Italy: Lesson learnt from dealing with multiple landslide types and the uneven spatial distribution of the national inventory M. Loche et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104125
251. Indispensable factors in landslide susceptibility modeling: the critical role of slope unit quantity-sensitivity R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01766-4
252. Shaping shallow landslide susceptibility as a function of rainfall events M. Fumagalli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4405-2025
253. Investigating earthquake legacy effect on hillslope deformation using InSAR‐derived time series K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5746
254. A closer look into variables controlling hillslope deformations in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area H. Sang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107584