53 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Integrating experimental and numerical approaches to simulate viscous debris flows using an HBP-SPH framework N. Pandey et al.
2. Shear-thinning, Coulomb friction and grain collisions in debris-flow waterfalls: Applications of a 3D phase mixture model with a single calibration parameter and a complex 4-way coupled resolved CFD-DEM approach A. von Boetticher et al.
3. Numerical modeling of tsunamis generated by granular landslides in OpenFOAM®: A Coulomb viscoplastic rheology A. Romano et al.
4. Tree-Based Machine Learning and Flow Simulation for Debris Flow Susceptibility, Runout Propagation, and Dynamics in the Higher Himalayas H. Daud et al.
5. Optimizing rheological properties for printability: low-temperature extrusion 3D printing of hydroxyapatite-polycaprolactone mixture inks for bone tissue engineering M. Yan & H. Awad
6. The force exerted by granular flows on slit dams A. Leonardi et al.
7. Effect of gradation variation on particle transport process in a generalized flash flood gully via CFD-DEM method Y. Nie et al.
8. On the energy transfer of tsunamis generated by subaerial granular landslides: A 2D numerical analysis A. Romano et al.
9. Topography-based and vectorized algorithm for extracting physical quantities in 3D-SPH form and its application in debris-flow entrainment modeling B. Su et al.
10. Load–deflection of flexible ring-net barrier in resisting debris flows Y. Kong et al.
11. Modeling submerged granular flow across multiple regimes using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with shear-induced volumetric behavior Q. Phan et al.
12. Bi‐Linear Laws Govern the Impacts of Debris Flows, Debris Avalanches, and Rock Avalanches on Flexible Barrier Y. Kong et al.
13. Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling T. Zhang et al.
14. A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al.
15. A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff
16. A fully analytical model for virtual mass force in mixture flows S. Pudasaini
17. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al.
18. Modeling Near-Field Impulsive Waves Generated by Deformable Landslide Using the HBP Model Based on the SPH Method W. Wang et al.
19. Brief communication: In-situ measurements of basal sliding in natural debris flows G. Nagl et al.
20. A Numerical Investigation on Droplet Bag Breakup Behavior of Polymer Solution G. Chu et al.
21. EDDA 2.0: integrated simulation of debris flow initiation and dynamics considering two initiation mechanisms P. Shen et al.
22. Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al.
23. SPH simulations of non-isothermal viscoplastic free-surface flows incorporating Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou model X. Xu & W. Yu
24. An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al.
25. A numerical study of the transition process from rock-ice avalanche to debris flow W. Liu et al.
26. Landslide impacts on built environment: Numerical analysis of the forces exerted by granular material collapsing on dry and submerged conditions G. Barajas et al.
27. Effect of debris-flow sediment grain-size distribution on fan morphology H. Tsunetaka et al.
28. Debris Flow Analyst (DA): A debris flow model considering kinematic uncertainties and using a GIS platform Y. Wu & H. Lan
29. An optimized volume of fluid method for modelling three-dimensional debris flows. Implementation in OpenFOAM, validation, and application in the Aiwa Watershed, Beijing Y. Zhang et al.
30. Runout Scaling and Deposit Morphology of Rapid Mudflows L. Jing et al.
31. A multiphase virtual mass model for debris flow P. Kattel et al.
32. Coalescence and mixing of a polymeric drop impacting on a dissimilar, miscible polymeric liquid film A. Bera et al.
33. Debris-Flow Impact on Piers with Different Cross-Sectional Shapes Y. Wang et al.
34. Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al.
35. Changes in granular textures of debris flow viewed from the unified grain size distribution T. Yang et al.
36. The compressible granular collapse in a fluid as a continuum: validity of a Navier–Stokes model with , -rheology M. Rauter
37. A modeling methodology to study the tributary-junction alluvial fan connectivity during a debris flow event A. Garcés et al.
38. An Integrated Study to Evaluate Debris Flow Hazard in Alpine Environment D. Tiranti et al.
39. Including μ(I) rheology in three-dimensional Navier–stokes-governed dynamic model for natural avalanches Z. Liu et al.
40. Determining trigger factors of soil mass failure in a hollow: A study based in the Sichuan Province, China J. Habumugisha et al.
41. An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application R. Li & Y. Teng
42. An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini
43. A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili
44. Development of a mathematical model for submarine granular flows P. Si et al.
45. Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini
46. Methodology for assessing pipeline failure probability due to a debris flow in the near field S. Song et al.
47. A homogenized sliding-block model for landslide motion analysis F. Zhang et al.
48. faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al.
49. DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al.
50. Debris-Flow Hazard Assessments: A Practitioner's View M. Jakob
51. Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior based on the SPH method incorporating the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou rheology model Z. Han et al.
52. How Flexible, Slit and Rigid Barriers Mitigate Two‐Phase Geophysical Mass Flows: A Numerical Appraisal Y. Kong et al.
53. Two-particle method for liquid–solid two-phase mixed flow F. Chen et al.