Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2909-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2909-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
31 Aug 2016
Model description paper |
| 31 Aug 2016
DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 1: Model description
Albrecht von Boetticher
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Environmental Systems Science,
ETH Zentrum, CHN H41, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Jens M. Turowski
Helmholtz-Centre Potsdam GFZ
German Research Center for Geosciences,
Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Brian W. McArdell
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Dieter Rickenmann
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
James W. Kirchner
Department of Environmental Systems Science,
ETH Zentrum, CHN H41, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,
Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Viewed
Total article views: 5,082 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Aug 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,504 | 2,160 | 418 | 5,082 | 530 | 156 | 169 |
- HTML: 2,504
- PDF: 2,160
- XML: 418
- Total: 5,082
- Supplement: 530
- BibTeX: 156
- EndNote: 169
Total article views: 4,267 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 Aug 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,220 | 1,646 | 401 | 4,267 | 356 | 147 | 159 |
- HTML: 2,220
- PDF: 1,646
- XML: 401
- Total: 4,267
- Supplement: 356
- BibTeX: 147
- EndNote: 159
Total article views: 815 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Aug 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 284 | 514 | 17 | 815 | 174 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 284
- PDF: 514
- XML: 17
- Total: 815
- Supplement: 174
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Cited
44 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Effect of debris-flow sediment grain-size distribution on fan morphology H. Tsunetaka et al. 10.5194/esurf-10-775-2022
- Shear-thinning, Coulomb friction and grain collisions in debris-flow waterfalls: Applications of a 3D phase mixture model with a single calibration parameter and a complex 4-way coupled resolved CFD-DEM approach A. von Boetticher et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024
- Debris Flow Analyst (DA): A debris flow model considering kinematic uncertainties and using a GIS platform Y. Wu & H. Lan 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105877
- An optimized volume of fluid method for modelling three-dimensional debris flows. Implementation in OpenFOAM, validation, and application in the Aiwa Watershed, Beijing Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104651
- Numerical modeling of tsunamis generated by granular landslides in OpenFOAM®: A Coulomb viscoplastic rheology A. Romano et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104391
- Optimizing rheological properties for printability: low-temperature extrusion 3D printing of hydroxyapatite-polycaprolactone mixture inks for bone tissue engineering M. Yan & H. Awad 10.3389/fmats.2023.1239692
- Runout Scaling and Deposit Morphology of Rapid Mudflows L. Jing et al. 10.1029/2018JF004667
- The force exerted by granular flows on slit dams A. Leonardi et al. 10.1007/s11440-019-00842-6
- A multiphase virtual mass model for debris flow P. Kattel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103638
- Effect of gradation variation on particle transport process in a generalized flash flood gully via CFD-DEM method Y. Nie et al. 10.1007/s11600-022-00862-z
- Debris-Flow Impact on Piers with Different Cross-Sectional Shapes Y. Wang et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001656
- Topography-based and vectorized algorithm for extracting physical quantities in 3D-SPH form and its application in debris-flow entrainment modeling B. Su et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107693
- Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.024
- Load–deflection of flexible ring-net barrier in resisting debris flows Y. Kong et al. 10.1680/jgeot.22.00135
- The compressible granular collapse in a fluid as a continuum: validity of a Navier–Stokes model with , -rheology M. Rauter 10.1017/jfm.2021.107
- Modeling submerged granular flow across multiple regimes using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with shear-induced volumetric behavior Q. Phan et al. 10.1063/5.0092726
- A modeling methodology to study the tributary-junction alluvial fan connectivity during a debris flow event A. Garcés et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-377-2022
- An Integrated Study to Evaluate Debris Flow Hazard in Alpine Environment D. Tiranti et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00060
- Bi‐Linear Laws Govern the Impacts of Debris Flows, Debris Avalanches, and Rock Avalanches on Flexible Barrier Y. Kong et al. 10.1029/2022JF006870
- Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling T. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2
- A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
- A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff 10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
- Including μ(I) rheology in three-dimensional Navier–stokes-governed dynamic model for natural avalanches Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.003
- Determining trigger factors of soil mass failure in a hollow: A study based in the Sichuan Province, China J. Habumugisha et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106368
- An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application R. Li & Y. Teng 10.1007/s11069-022-05376-x
- An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
- A fully analytical model for virtual mass force in mixture flows S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.01.005
- Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
- A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1029/2019JF005204
- Development of a mathematical model for submarine granular flows P. Si et al. 10.1063/1.5030349
- Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
- Methodology for assessing pipeline failure probability due to a debris flow in the near field S. Song et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15956
- Modeling Near-Field Impulsive Waves Generated by Deformable Landslide Using the HBP Model Based on the SPH Method W. Wang et al. 10.1007/s11802-024-5527-y
- faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
- DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
- A Numerical Investigation on Droplet Bag Breakup Behavior of Polymer Solution G. Chu et al. 10.3390/polym12102172
- EDDA 2.0: integrated simulation of debris flow initiation and dynamics considering two initiation mechanisms P. Shen et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2841-2018
- Debris-Flow Hazard Assessments: A Practitioner's View M. Jakob 10.2113/EEG-D-20-00110
- Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior based on the SPH method incorporating the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou rheology model Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.013
- How Flexible, Slit and Rigid Barriers Mitigate Two‐Phase Geophysical Mass Flows: A Numerical Appraisal Y. Kong et al. 10.1029/2021JF006587
- Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al. 10.3390/geotechnics2030025
- Two-particle method for liquid–solid two-phase mixed flow F. Chen et al. 10.1063/5.0140599
- An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
- Simulation Analysis of Concrete Pumping Based on Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics and Discrete Elements Method Coupling W. Chen et al. 10.3390/ma15124294
43 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Effect of debris-flow sediment grain-size distribution on fan morphology H. Tsunetaka et al. 10.5194/esurf-10-775-2022
- Shear-thinning, Coulomb friction and grain collisions in debris-flow waterfalls: Applications of a 3D phase mixture model with a single calibration parameter and a complex 4-way coupled resolved CFD-DEM approach A. von Boetticher et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024
- Debris Flow Analyst (DA): A debris flow model considering kinematic uncertainties and using a GIS platform Y. Wu & H. Lan 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105877
- An optimized volume of fluid method for modelling three-dimensional debris flows. Implementation in OpenFOAM, validation, and application in the Aiwa Watershed, Beijing Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104651
- Numerical modeling of tsunamis generated by granular landslides in OpenFOAM®: A Coulomb viscoplastic rheology A. Romano et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104391
- Optimizing rheological properties for printability: low-temperature extrusion 3D printing of hydroxyapatite-polycaprolactone mixture inks for bone tissue engineering M. Yan & H. Awad 10.3389/fmats.2023.1239692
- Runout Scaling and Deposit Morphology of Rapid Mudflows L. Jing et al. 10.1029/2018JF004667
- The force exerted by granular flows on slit dams A. Leonardi et al. 10.1007/s11440-019-00842-6
- A multiphase virtual mass model for debris flow P. Kattel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103638
- Effect of gradation variation on particle transport process in a generalized flash flood gully via CFD-DEM method Y. Nie et al. 10.1007/s11600-022-00862-z
- Debris-Flow Impact on Piers with Different Cross-Sectional Shapes Y. Wang et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001656
- Topography-based and vectorized algorithm for extracting physical quantities in 3D-SPH form and its application in debris-flow entrainment modeling B. Su et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107693
- Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.024
- Load–deflection of flexible ring-net barrier in resisting debris flows Y. Kong et al. 10.1680/jgeot.22.00135
- The compressible granular collapse in a fluid as a continuum: validity of a Navier–Stokes model with , -rheology M. Rauter 10.1017/jfm.2021.107
- Modeling submerged granular flow across multiple regimes using the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with shear-induced volumetric behavior Q. Phan et al. 10.1063/5.0092726
- A modeling methodology to study the tributary-junction alluvial fan connectivity during a debris flow event A. Garcés et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-377-2022
- An Integrated Study to Evaluate Debris Flow Hazard in Alpine Environment D. Tiranti et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00060
- Bi‐Linear Laws Govern the Impacts of Debris Flows, Debris Avalanches, and Rock Avalanches on Flexible Barrier Y. Kong et al. 10.1029/2022JF006870
- Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling T. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2
- A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
- A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff 10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
- Including μ(I) rheology in three-dimensional Navier–stokes-governed dynamic model for natural avalanches Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.11.003
- Determining trigger factors of soil mass failure in a hollow: A study based in the Sichuan Province, China J. Habumugisha et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106368
- An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application R. Li & Y. Teng 10.1007/s11069-022-05376-x
- An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
- A fully analytical model for virtual mass force in mixture flows S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.01.005
- Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
- A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1029/2019JF005204
- Development of a mathematical model for submarine granular flows P. Si et al. 10.1063/1.5030349
- Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
- Methodology for assessing pipeline failure probability due to a debris flow in the near field S. Song et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15956
- Modeling Near-Field Impulsive Waves Generated by Deformable Landslide Using the HBP Model Based on the SPH Method W. Wang et al. 10.1007/s11802-024-5527-y
- faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
- DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
- A Numerical Investigation on Droplet Bag Breakup Behavior of Polymer Solution G. Chu et al. 10.3390/polym12102172
- EDDA 2.0: integrated simulation of debris flow initiation and dynamics considering two initiation mechanisms P. Shen et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2841-2018
- Debris-Flow Hazard Assessments: A Practitioner's View M. Jakob 10.2113/EEG-D-20-00110
- Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior based on the SPH method incorporating the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou rheology model Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.013
- How Flexible, Slit and Rigid Barriers Mitigate Two‐Phase Geophysical Mass Flows: A Numerical Appraisal Y. Kong et al. 10.1029/2021JF006587
- Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al. 10.3390/geotechnics2030025
- Two-particle method for liquid–solid two-phase mixed flow F. Chen et al. 10.1063/5.0140599
- An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
Debris flows are characterized by unsteady flows of water with different content of clay, silt, sand, gravel, and large particles, resulting in a dense moving mixture mass. Here we present a three-dimensional fluid dynamic solver that simulates the flow as a mixture of a pressure-dependent rheology model of the gravel mixed with a Herschel–Bulkley rheology of the fine material suspension. We link rheological parameters to the material composition. The user must specify two free model parameters.
Debris flows are characterized by unsteady flows of water with different content of clay, silt,...
