Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.240
IF5.240
IF 5-year value: 5.768
IF 5-year
5.768
CiteScore value: 8.9
CiteScore
8.9
SNIP value: 1.713
SNIP1.713
IPP value: 5.53
IPP5.53
SJR value: 3.18
SJR3.18
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 71
Scimago H
index
71
h5-index value: 51
h5-index51
Volume 9, issue 8
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2589–2622, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: The Norwegian Earth System Model: NorESM; basic development,...

Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2589–2622, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Development and technical paper 02 Aug 2016

Development and technical paper | 02 Aug 2016

Evaluation of NorESM-OC (versions 1 and 1.2), the ocean carbon-cycle stand-alone configuration of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM1)

Jörg Schwinger et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,440 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,201 1,097 142 2,440 162 154
  • HTML: 1,201
  • PDF: 1,097
  • XML: 142
  • Total: 2,440
  • BibTeX: 162
  • EndNote: 154
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2016)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 01 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present an evaluation of the ocean carbon cycle stand-alone configuration of the Norwegian Earth System Model. A re-tuning of the ecosystem parameterisation improves surface tracer fields between versions 1 and 1.2 of the model. Focus is placed on the evaluation of newly implemented parameterisations of the biological carbon pump (i.e. the sinking of particular organic carbon). We find that the model previously underestimated the carbon transport into the deep ocean below 2000 m depth.
We present an evaluation of the ocean carbon cycle stand-alone configuration of the Norwegian...
Citation