151 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Temperature acclimation and adaptation of enzyme physiology in Neurospora discreta S. Allison et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.07.005
2. Denitrification and the challenge of scaling microsite knowledge to the globe G. Robertson https://doi.org/10.1002/mlf2.12080
3. Seasonal soil microbial responses are limited to changes in functionality at two Alpine forest sites differing in altitude and vegetation J. Siles & R. Margesin https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02363-2
4. Metabolic tradeoffs and heterogeneity in microbial responses to temperature determine the fate of litter carbon in simulations of a warmer world G. Pold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4875-2019
5. Global contribution of invertebrates to forest litter decomposition X. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14423
6. Ectomycorrhizal Plant-Fungal Co-invasions as Natural Experiments for Connecting Plant and Fungal Traits to Their Ecosystem Consequences J. Hoeksema et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00084
7. Role of Soil Microbiota Enzymes in Soil Health and Activity Changes Depending on Climate Change and the Type of Soil Ecosystem J. Daunoras et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020085
8. Substrate quality and concentration control decomposition and microbial strategies in a model soil system J. Schnecker et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00571-8
9. Vulnerability and resistance in the spatial heterogeneity of soil microbial communities under resource additions K. Gravuer et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908117117
10. Carbon-phosphorus cycle models overestimate CO 2 enrichment response in a mature Eucalyptus forest M. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adl5822
11. Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities T. George et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x
12. Symmetric responses of microbial carbon and nutrient limitations to warming and cooling in boreal forests: Insights from a transplant experiment S. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105978
13. Global Simulation and Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter and Microbial Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks Using the Microbial Decomposition Model ORCHIMIC v2.0 Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006836
14. Matrix Approach to Land Carbon Cycle Modeling Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003008
15. Perspectives: Effect of global change drivers on carbon fluxes and resilience of European forests M. Gharun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123844
16. A Critical Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Effective Cation Exchange Capacity and Soil Organic Carbon Content in Swiss Forest Soils E. Solly et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00098
17. Model behavior of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: predicting soil carbon dynamics under climate change K. Treseder https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2015-0245
18. Constraining the organic matter decay parameters in the CBM-CFS3 using Canadian National Forest Inventory data and a Bayesian inversion technique O. Hararuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.09.008
19. Modeling boreal forest soil dynamics with the microbially explicit soil model MIMICS+ (v1.0) E. Aas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024
20. Heavy and wet: The consequences of violating assumptions of measuring soil microbial growth efficiency using the 18O water method G. Pold et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.069
21. Can models adequately reflect how long-term nitrogen enrichment alters the forest soil carbon cycle? B. Eastman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-201-2024
22. Nitrogen limitation of decomposition and decay: How can it occur? C. Averill & B. Waring https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13980
23. On the relationships between the Michaelis–Menten kinetics, reverse Michaelis–Menten kinetics, equilibrium chemistry approximation kinetics, and quadratic kinetics J. Tang https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3823-2015
24. Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland soil organic carbon by integrating process-based models differing in structures with machine learning X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03516-9
25. Radiocarbon analysis reveals underestimation of soil organic carbon persistence in new-generation soil models A. Brunmayr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024
26. Microbial properties regulate spatial variation in the differences in heterotrophic respiration and its temperature sensitivity between primary and secondary forests from tropical to cold-temperate zones Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.007
27. Modeling coupled pesticide degradation and organic matter turnover: From gene abundance to process rates H. Pagel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.09.014
28. Content of soil organic carbon and labile fractions depend on local combinations of mineral-phase characteristics M. Ortner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-113-2022
29. A scenario-based framework linking biophysical soil carbon modeling to illustrative economic signals A. Ajayi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104791
30. Annual grass invasions and wildfire deplete ecosystem carbon storage by >50% to resistant base levels T. Maxwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01795-9
31. Assembly-free short-read metagenomic maximum growth rate prediction J. Natarajan & J. Weissman https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2025.00094
32. Model structures amplify uncertainty in predicted soil carbon responses to climate change Z. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04526-9
33. Managing Agroecosystems for Soil Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency: Ecological Unknowns, Potential Outcomes, and a Path Forward C. Kallenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01146
34. SoDaH: the SOils DAta Harmonization database, an open-source synthesis of soil data from research networks, version 1.0 W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1843-2021
35. A Trait-based Investigation of Fungal Decomposition with Machine Learning S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235802010
36. Evaluation and modeling of fungi towards wood degradation W. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2025699
37. Using plant, microbe, and soil fauna traits to improve the predictive power of biogeochemical models E. Fry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13092
38. Reducing uncertainty in projections of terrestrial carbon uptake N. Lovenduski & G. Bonan https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa66b8
39. The legacy of intensive agricultural history on the soil health of (sub)tropical landscapes S. Crow et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.991262
40. KEYLINK: towards a more integrative soil representation for inclusion in ecosystem scale models. I. review and model concept G. Deckmyn et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9750
41. Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange J. Casas-Ruiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37232-2
42. Soil Bacterial and Fungal Richness Forecast Patterns of Early Pine Litter Decomposition M. Albright et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.542220
43. Biotic Interactions in Microbial Communities as Modulators of Biogeochemical Processes: Methanotrophy as a Model System A. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01285
44. Exploring plant and soil microbial communities as indicators of soil organic carbon in a California rangeland J. Weverka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108952
45. Improving predictions of soil heterotrophic respiration: A parameter-optimized microbial model for alpine meadows in the three-river source region, Qinghai-Tibet plateau Y. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114673
46. Applying population and community ecology theory to advance understanding of belowground biogeochemistry R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12712
47. Edaphic factors override temperature in shaping soil bacterial diversity across an elevation-vegetation gradient in Himalaya P. Bhattacharya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104306
48. Comparing models of microbial–substrate interactions and their response to warming D. Sihi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1733-2016
49. Microbial community composition controls carbon flux across litter types in early phase of litter decomposition M. Kroeger et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15705
50. Carbon cycle confidence and uncertainty: Exploring variation among soil biogeochemical models W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13979
51. Differences in substrate use linked to divergent carbon flow during litter decomposition M. Albright et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa135
52. Leveraging observed soil heterotrophic respiration fluxes as a novel constraint on global‐scale models J. Jian et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15795
53. The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls R. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054234
54. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing R. Wilhelm et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0279-6
55. Spatial Control of Carbon Dynamics in Soil by Microbial Decomposer Communities H. Pagel et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00002
56. Zoogeochemistry: Breaking Down the Silos Between Biogeochemistry and Zoology R. Buchkowski https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JG009048
57. Multi‐modelling predictions show high uncertainty of required carbon input changes to reach a 4‰ target E. Bruni et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13330
58. Microbial life-history strategies regulate soil organic carbon formation and stability across soil depths during 300 years of the temperate forest succession J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2026.100498
59. Embracing the dynamic nature of soil structure: A paradigm illuminating the role of life in critical zones of the Anthropocene P. Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103873
60. An ensemble estimate of Australian soil organic carbon using machine learning and process-based modelling L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-619-2024
61. Stoichiometrically coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization model version 1.0 (MIMICS-CN v1.0) E. Kyker-Snowman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4413-2020
62. Choosing the appropriate methodology to monitor soil organic carbon (SOC) in croplands: aligning methods with evolving monitoring reporting verification (MRV) frameworks A. Ihasusta et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2026.2638317
63. Increased microbial carbon use efficiency and metabolic capacity in manure amended soils: A 665-day field experiment J. Sayre et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-026-01986-w
64. Iron and aluminum association with microbially processed organic matter via meso-density aggregate formation across soils: organo-metallic glue hypothesis R. Wagai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-597-2020
65. Eco‐Evolutionary Optimality in Soil Organic Matter Models E. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70278
66. A trait-based understanding of wood decomposition by fungi N. Lustenhouwer et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909166117
67. A holistic framework integrating plant-microbe-mineral regulation of soil bioavailable nitrogen A. Daly et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00793-9
68. Organic matter stability and lability in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: A chemical and microbial perspective V. Verrone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167757
69. Toward spectrally truthful models for gap-filling soil respiration and methane fluxes. A case study in coastal forested wetlands in North Carolina B. Mitra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110038
70. Causality from palaeontological time series B. Hannisdal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12370
71. Embracing fine‐root system complexity in terrestrial ecosystem modeling B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16659
72. Interpreting stoichiometric homeostasis and flexibility of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus K. Asada et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110018
73. Micro-Scale Microbial Dynamics at the Soil–Water Interface: Biofilm Architecture, Non-Linear Response, and Emerging Methodological Frontiers A. Majumdar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18060658
74. Research advances in mechanisms of climate change impacts on soil organic carbon dynamics Y. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acfa12
75. Data from long-term experiments in temperate croplands to evaluate soil organic carbon models K. Fujisaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06863-7
76. Microbial seasonality promotes soil respiratory carbon emission in natural ecosystems: A modeling study L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15627
77. Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content P. Trivedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13779
78. Arctic Soil Governs Whether Climate Change Drives Global Losses or Gains in Soil Carbon W. Wieder et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085543
79. How to adequately represent biological processes in modeling multifunctionality of arable soils H. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01802-3
80. Beyond clay: towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content C. Rasmussen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0424-3
81. Response of Plant Rhizosphere Microenvironment to Water Management in Soil- and Substrate-Based Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) Systems: A Review B. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.691651
82. Trait-based modelling in ecology: A review of two decades of research L. Zakharova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.008
83. Substantial uncertainties in global soil organic carbon simulated by multiple terrestrial carbon cycle models Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4679
84. Dispersal-Based Microbial Community Assembly Decreases Biogeochemical Function E. Graham & J. Stegen https://doi.org/10.3390/pr5040065
85. Soil microbiomes as sources and sinks of greenhouse gases. Challenges and opportunities C. Orr et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/sumbio/qvaf033
86. Mineralogic Controls are Harbingers of Hydrological Controls on Soil Organic Matter Content in Warmer Boreal Forests M. Patrick et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072453
87. Microbial community-level regulation explains soil carbon responses to long-term litter manipulations K. Georgiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01116-z
88. Optimizing Available Network Resources to Address Questions in Environmental Biogeochemistry E. Hinckley et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw005
89. Patterns and controls of aboveground litter inputs to temperate forests F. Jevon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00988-8
90. Microbial dynamics and soil physicochemical properties explain large‐scale variations in soil organic carbon H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14994
91. Multi 'omics comparison reveals metabolome biochemistry, not microbiome composition or gene expression, corresponds to elevated biogeochemical function in the hyporheic zone E. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.256
92. Mineral-associated organic carbon dominance and persistence in coastal wetlands Y. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2026.04.011
93. Evidence for the existence and ecological relevance of fast-cycling mineral-associated organic matter A. Jilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02681-8
94. Beyond microbes: Are fauna the next frontier in soil biogeochemical models? A. Grandy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.008
95. Stoichiometric and structural uncertainty in soil food web models R. Buchkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13706
96. Implications of climate and litter quality for simulations of litterbag decomposition at high latitudes E. Aas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3789-2024
97. Leveraging the signature of heterotrophic respiration on atmospheric CO2 for model benchmarking S. Basile et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1293-2020
98. Interannual variability and seasonality of litterfall in three temperate and boreal forest ecosystems of eastern Canada: A synthesis of long-term monitoring R. Frisko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122069
99. Microbial Models for Simulating Soil Carbon Dynamics: A Review A. Chandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007436
100. KEYLINK: towards a more integrative soil representation for inclusion in ecosystem scale models—II: model description, implementation and testing O. Flores et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10707
101. Model-based analysis of environmental controls over ecosystem primary production in an alpine tundra dry meadow Z. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0193-9
102. Data-model integration in global change manipulative experiments: progresses, challenges and future directions H. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtag033
103. A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models H. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4043-2020
104. Leveraging Environmental Research and Observation Networks to Advance Soil Carbon Science S. Weintraub et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004956
105. Scale dependence in functional equivalence and difference in the soil microbiome A. Polussa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108451
106. Optimizing process-based models to predict current and future soil organic carbon stocks at high-resolution D. Pierson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14224-8
107. Evidence for a genetic basis in functional trait tradeoffs with microbial growth rate but not growth yield E. Morrison et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108765
108. The nitrogen gap in soil health concepts and fertility measurements A. Grandy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108856
109. Divergent carbon use efficiency-growth rate tradeoff in popular biological growth models J. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3995-2026
110. Improved global-scale predictions of soil carbon stocks with Millennial Version 2 R. Abramoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108466
111. Increasing the spatial and temporal impact of ecological research: A roadmap for integrating a novel terrestrial process into an Earth system model E. Kyker‐Snowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15894
112. Modellering av biogeokjemiske prosesser i den norske klimamodellen NorESM T. Berntsen https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3118-2021-05-06
113. Microbial biomass – not diversity – drives soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization in Spanish holm oak ecosystems E. Bruni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117408
114. Rapid soil degradation following deforestation in Eastern Africa L. Summerauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3907-2026
115. Seasonal dynamics of Arctic soils: Capturing year-round processes in measurements and soil biogeochemical models Z. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104820
116. Woody encroachment increases carbon degradation rates and alters soil microbial community structure in restored and remnant mesic tallgrass prairie K. Beals et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106426
117. Microbial necromass as the central architect of soil carbon: Reconciling plant inputs, microbial processing, and mineral stabilization in a critical synthesis H. Etesami https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2026.100221
118. Soil carbon cycling proxies: Understanding their critical role in predicting climate change feedbacks V. Bailey et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13926
119. Substrate quality influences organic matter accumulation in the soil silt and clay fraction K. Cyle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.014
120. Modeling microbial carbon fluxes and stocks in global soils from 1901 to 2016 L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2313-2024
121. Integrating Microbial Community Data Into an Ecosystem‐Scale Model to Predict Litter Decomposition in the Face of Climate Change K. Rocci et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70352
122. Redox and temperature-sensitive changes in microbial communities and soil chemistry dictate greenhouse gas loss from thawed permafrost J. Ernakovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0354-5
123. Leveraging traits for insight into the fungal ecology of burned ecosystems J. Hopkins & A. Bennett https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70008
124. A framework for integrating genomics, microbial traits, and ecosystem biogeochemistry Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57386-5
125. Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0) M. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024
126. Increasing nitrogen availability increases water-use efficiency and decreases nitrogen-use efficiency in Acer saccharum E. Perkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf119
127. Non-monotonic and distinct temperature responses of respiration of soil microbial functional groups Z. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107902
128. The landscape of soil carbon data: Emerging questions, synergies and databases A. Malhotra et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319873309
129. Faster turnover of new soil carbon inputs under increased atmospheric CO2 K. van Groenigen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13752
130. Fast-decaying tree litter reduces the temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition by increasing microbial necromass carbon R. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117185
131. An assessment of cumulative CO2 efflux as proxy of organic matter turnover time in the soil priming effect: analysis using the lumped parameter approach T. Sengupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05569-w
132. Nutrient and Rainfall Additions Shift Phylogenetically Estimated Traits of Soil Microbial Communities K. Gravuer & A. Eskelinen https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01271
133. A Mechanistic Model of Microbially Mediated Soil Biogeochemical Processes: A Reality Check S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006077
134. Observation‐based global soil heterotrophic respiration indicates underestimated turnover and sequestration of soil carbon by terrestrial ecosystem models Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16286
135. Fine roots and mycorrhizal fungi accelerate leaf litter decomposition in a northern hardwood forest regardless of dominant tree mycorrhizal associations A. Lang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17155
136. Nutrient and stress tolerance traits linked to fungal responses to global change K. Treseder et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00144
137. Minerals in the rhizosphere: overlooked mediators of soil nitrogen availability to plants and microbes A. Jilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0459-5
138. Pangenomes suggest ecological-evolutionary responses to experimental soil warming M. Choudoir et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00059-25
139. Model uncertainty obscures major driver of soil carbon X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06999-1
140. Microbes, memory and moisture: Predicting microbial moisture responses and their impact on carbon cycling S. E. Evans et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14034
141. Grand Challenges in Terrestrial Microbiology: Moving on From a Decade of Progress in Microbial Biogeochemistry S. Hallin & P. Bodelier https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00981
142. Combination of energy limitation and sorption capacity explains 14C depth gradients B. Ahrens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107912
143. Litter-inhabiting fungi show high level of specialization towards biopolymers composing plant and fungal biomass C. Algora Gallardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01507-3
144. Depth-dependent hydrological and substrate dynamics enhance methane modeling and inform water management in rice systems R. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111241
145. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in natural and urban ecosystems: Quercus humboldtii as a study case in the tropical Andes J. Sanchez-Tello & A. Corrales https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-024-01140-0
146. A Comparison of Linear Conventional and Nonlinear Microbial Models for Simulating Pulse Dynamics of Soil Heterotrophic Respiration in a Semi‐Arid Grassland J. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006120
147. Microbial Activity and Root Carbon Inputs Are More Important than Soil Carbon Diffusion in Simulating Soil Carbon Profiles Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006205
148. Divergent controls of soil organic carbon between observations and process-based models K. Georgiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00819-2
149. Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52160-5
150. Using explainable AI to diagnose the representation of environmental drivers in process-based soil organic carbon models L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7845-2025
151. Carbon control on terrestrial ecosystem function across contrasting site productivities: the carbon connection revisited N. Dove et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2695