Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1637-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1637-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
02 Jun 2015
Development and technical paper |
| 02 Jun 2015
Vertical resolution dependence of gravity wave momentum flux simulated by an atmospheric general circulation model
S. Watanabe
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Y. Kawatani
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan
M. Takahashi
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
Viewed
Total article views: 4,836 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Nov 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,877 | 1,732 | 227 | 4,836 | 276 | 347 |
- HTML: 2,877
- PDF: 1,732
- XML: 227
- Total: 4,836
- BibTeX: 276
- EndNote: 347
Total article views: 4,178 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Jun 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,594 | 1,369 | 215 | 4,178 | 250 | 321 |
- HTML: 2,594
- PDF: 1,369
- XML: 215
- Total: 4,178
- BibTeX: 250
- EndNote: 321
Total article views: 658 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Nov 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 283 | 363 | 12 | 658 | 26 | 26 |
- HTML: 283
- PDF: 363
- XML: 12
- Total: 658
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 26
Cited
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Model Resolution Sensitivity of the Simulation of North Atlantic Oscillation Teleconnections to Precipitation Extremes S. Mahajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028594
- A study of the dynamical characteristics of inertia–gravity waves in the Antarctic mesosphere combining the PANSY radar and a non-hydrostatic general circulation model R. Shibuya & K. Sato https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3395-2019
- A dynamics-based separation of deep and shallow stratospheric circulation branches R. Baikhadzhaev et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12753-2025
- Contribution of Gravity Waves to Universal Vertical Wavenumber (∼m−3) Spectra Revealed by a Gravity‐Wave‐Permitting General Circulation Model H. Okui et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036222
- Atmospheric Gravity Waves in Aeolus Wind Lidar Observations T. Banyard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092756
- Numerical Simulations of High‐Frequency Gravity Wave Propagation Through Fine Structures in the Mesosphere T. Mixa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029746
- Variability of the Stratospheric Quasi-Biennial Oscillation and Its Wave Forcing Simulated in the Beijing Climate Center Atmospheric General Circulation Model Y. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0123.1
- The upper-atmosphere extension of the ICON general circulation model (version: ua-icon-1.0) S. Borchert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019
- The impact of vertical resolution on the simulation of Typhoon Lekima (2019) by a cloud-permitting model M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0923-8
- Impacts of Limited Model Resolution on the Representation of Mountain Wave and Secondary Wave Dynamics in Local and Global Models: 2. Mountain Wave and Secondary Wave Evolutions in the Thermosphere D. Fritts et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036035
- A scalable parallel algorithm for atmospheric general circulation models on a multi-core cluster Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.02.008
- Impact of Increased Vertical Resolution in WACCM on the Climatology of Major Sudden Stratospheric Warmings V. Chávez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040546
- Vertical Resolution Requirements in Atmospheric Simulation W. Skamarock et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0043.1
- The MATS satellite mission – gravity wave studies by Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy J. Gumbel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-431-2020
- Do Dry GCMs Generate QBO-like Oscillation? S. FUJITA & K. ISHIOKA https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2024-026
- Convectively Generated Gravity Waves in High Resolution Models of Tropical Dynamics S. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001390
- Importance of Gravity Wave Forcing for Springtime Southern Polar Vortex Breakdown as Revealed by ERA5 A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092762
- Quasi-12 h inertia–gravity waves in the lower mesosphere observed by the PANSY radar at Syowa Station (39.6° E, 69.0° S) R. Shibuya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6455-2017
- Global-scale gravity wave analysis methodology for the ESA Earth Explorer 11 candidate CAIRT S. Rhode et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5785-2024
- An ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation system for the whole neutral atmosphere D. Koshin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3145-2020
- The Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model for CMIP6 HighResMIP simulations (NICAM16-S): experimental design, model description, and impacts of model updates C. Kodama et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-795-2021
- Ensemble-Based Gravity Wave Parameter Retrieval for Numerical Weather Prediction D. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0191.1
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Model Resolution Sensitivity of the Simulation of North Atlantic Oscillation Teleconnections to Precipitation Extremes S. Mahajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028594
- A study of the dynamical characteristics of inertia–gravity waves in the Antarctic mesosphere combining the PANSY radar and a non-hydrostatic general circulation model R. Shibuya & K. Sato https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3395-2019
- A dynamics-based separation of deep and shallow stratospheric circulation branches R. Baikhadzhaev et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12753-2025
- Contribution of Gravity Waves to Universal Vertical Wavenumber (∼m−3) Spectra Revealed by a Gravity‐Wave‐Permitting General Circulation Model H. Okui et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036222
- Atmospheric Gravity Waves in Aeolus Wind Lidar Observations T. Banyard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092756
- Numerical Simulations of High‐Frequency Gravity Wave Propagation Through Fine Structures in the Mesosphere T. Mixa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029746
- Variability of the Stratospheric Quasi-Biennial Oscillation and Its Wave Forcing Simulated in the Beijing Climate Center Atmospheric General Circulation Model Y. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0123.1
- The upper-atmosphere extension of the ICON general circulation model (version: ua-icon-1.0) S. Borchert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3541-2019
- The impact of vertical resolution on the simulation of Typhoon Lekima (2019) by a cloud-permitting model M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0923-8
- Impacts of Limited Model Resolution on the Representation of Mountain Wave and Secondary Wave Dynamics in Local and Global Models: 2. Mountain Wave and Secondary Wave Evolutions in the Thermosphere D. Fritts et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036035
- A scalable parallel algorithm for atmospheric general circulation models on a multi-core cluster Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.02.008
- Impact of Increased Vertical Resolution in WACCM on the Climatology of Major Sudden Stratospheric Warmings V. Chávez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040546
- Vertical Resolution Requirements in Atmospheric Simulation W. Skamarock et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0043.1
- The MATS satellite mission – gravity wave studies by Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy J. Gumbel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-431-2020
- Do Dry GCMs Generate QBO-like Oscillation? S. FUJITA & K. ISHIOKA https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2024-026
- Convectively Generated Gravity Waves in High Resolution Models of Tropical Dynamics S. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001390
- Importance of Gravity Wave Forcing for Springtime Southern Polar Vortex Breakdown as Revealed by ERA5 A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092762
- Quasi-12 h inertia–gravity waves in the lower mesosphere observed by the PANSY radar at Syowa Station (39.6° E, 69.0° S) R. Shibuya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6455-2017
- Global-scale gravity wave analysis methodology for the ESA Earth Explorer 11 candidate CAIRT S. Rhode et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5785-2024
- An ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation system for the whole neutral atmosphere D. Koshin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3145-2020
- The Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model for CMIP6 HighResMIP simulations (NICAM16-S): experimental design, model description, and impacts of model updates C. Kodama et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-795-2021
- Ensemble-Based Gravity Wave Parameter Retrieval for Numerical Weather Prediction D. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0191.1
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 08 Sep 2026
