Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2693-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2693-2014
Development and technical paper
 | 
18 Nov 2014
Development and technical paper |  | 18 Nov 2014

MM5 v3.6.1 and WRF v3.5.1 model comparison of standard and surface energy variables in the development of the planetary boundary layer

C.-S. M. Wilmot, B. Rappenglück, X. Li, and G. Cuchiara

Related authors

Measurement report: Summertime and wintertime VOCs in Houston: Source apportionment and spatial distribution of source origins
Bavand Sadeghi, Arman Pouyaei, Yunsoo Choi, and Bernhard Rappenglueck
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-565,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-565, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
The impact of observation nudging on simulated meteorology and ozone concentrations during DISCOVER-AQ 2013 Texas campaign
Xiangshang Li, Yunsoo Choi, Beata Czader, Anirban Roy, Hyuncheol Kim, Barry Lefer, and Shuai Pan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3127–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3127-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3127-2016, 2016
Short summary
Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010
P. L. Hayes, A. G. Carlton, K. R. Baker, R. Ahmadov, R. A. Washenfelder, S. Alvarez, B. Rappenglück, J. B. Gilman, W. C. Kuster, J. A. de Gouw, P. Zotter, A. S. H. Prévôt, S. Szidat, T. E. Kleindienst, J. H. Offenberg, P. K. Ma, and J. L. Jimenez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015, 2015
Short summary
Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region
B. Yuan, P. R. Veres, C. Warneke, J. M. Roberts, J. B. Gilman, A. Koss, P. M. Edwards, M. Graus, W. C. Kuster, S.-M. Li, R. J. Wild, S. S. Brown, W. P. Dubé, B. M. Lerner, E. J. Williams, J. E. Johnson, P. K. Quinn, T. S. Bates, B. Lefer, P. L. Hayes, J. L. Jimenez, R. J. Weber, R. Zamora, B. Ervens, D. B. Millet, B. Rappenglück, and J. A. de Gouw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1975–1993, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015, 2015
Short summary
Impact of updated traffic emissions on HONO mixing ratios simulated for urban site in Houston, Texas
B. H. Czader, Y. Choi, X. Li, S. Alvarez, and B. Lefer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1253–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1253-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
GAN-argcPredNet v2.0: a radar echo extrapolation model based on spatiotemporal process enhancement
Kun Zheng, Qiya Tan, Huihua Ruan, Jinbiao Zhang, Cong Luo, Siyu Tang, Yunlei Yi, Yugang Tian, and Jianmei Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 399–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-399-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-399-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of the GEFS-Aerosols annual budget to better understand aerosol predictions simulated in the model
Li Pan, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, Li Zhang, Raffaele Montuoro, Barry Baker, Jeff McQueen, Georg A. Grell, Stuart A. McKeen, Shobha Kondragunta, Xiaoyang Zhang, Gregory J. Frost, Fanglin Yang, and Ivanka Stajner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 431–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-431-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-431-2024, 2024
Short summary
A model for rapid PM2.5 exposure estimates in wildfire conditions using routinely available data: rapidfire v0.1.3
Sean Raffuse, Susan O'Neill, and Rebecca Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 381–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-381-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-381-2024, 2024
Short summary
BoundaryLayerDynamics.jl v1.0: a modern codebase for atmospheric boundary-layer simulations
Manuel F. Schmid, Marco G. Giometto, Gregory A. Lawrence, and Marc B. Parlange
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 321–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-321-2024, 2024
Short summary
The wave-age-dependent stress parameterisation (WASP) for momentum and heat turbulent fluxes at sea in SURFEX v8.1
Marie-Noëlle Bouin, Cindy Lebeaupin Brossier, Sylvie Malardel, Aurore Voldoire, and César Sauvage
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 117–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-117-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Air Resources Laboratory: Eta Data Assimilation System (EDAS) Archive Information, available at: http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/edas80.php (last access: 2 December 2013), 2013.
Banta, R. M., Senff, C., Alvarez, R., Langford, A., Parrish, D., Trainer, M., Darby, L., Hardesty, R., Lambeth, B., Neuman, J., Angevine, W., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Sandberg, S., and White, A.: Dependence of daily peak O3 concentrations near Houston, Texas on environmental factors: wind speed, temperature, and boundary-layer depth, Atmos. Environ., 45, 162–173, 2011.
Borge, R., Alexandrov, V., del Vas, J. J., Lumbreras, J., and Rodriguez, E.: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8560–8574, 2008.
Byun, D. W. and Schere, K.: Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other componenets of the Models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006.
Download