Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2693-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
18 Nov 2014
Development and technical paper |
| 18 Nov 2014
MM5 v3.6.1 and WRF v3.5.1 model comparison of standard and surface energy variables in the development of the planetary boundary layer
Related authors
Cited articles
Air Resources Laboratory: Eta Data Assimilation System (EDAS) Archive Information, available at: http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/edas80.php (last access: 2 December 2013), 2013.
Banta, R. M., Senff, C., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Darby, L., Ryerson, T., Alvarez, R., Spandberg, S., Williams, E., and Trainer, M.: A bad air day in Houston, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 657–669, 2005.
Banta, R. M., Senff, C., Alvarez, R., Langford, A., Parrish, D., Trainer, M., Darby, L., Hardesty, R., Lambeth, B., Neuman, J., Angevine, W., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Sandberg, S., and White, A.: Dependence of daily peak O3 concentrations near Houston, Texas on environmental factors: wind speed, temperature, and boundary-layer depth, Atmos. Environ., 45, 162–173, 2011.
Borge, R., Alexandrov, V., del Vas, J. J., Lumbreras, J., and Rodriguez, E.: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8560–8574, 2008.
Byun, D. W. and Schere, K.: Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other componenets of the Models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006.
