180 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Impact of aerosol microphysical properties on mass scattering cross sections V. Obiso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.03.001
2. An assessment of aerosol optical properties from remote-sensing observations and regional chemistry–climate coupled models over Europe L. Palacios-Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5021-2018
3. Contributions of Regional Transport Versus Local Emissions and Their Retention Effects During PM2.5 Pollution Under Various Stable Weather in Shanghai B. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.858685
4. Projections of future wildfires impacts on air pollutants and air toxics in a changing climate over the western United States C. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119213
5. The impact of US wildland fires on ozone and particulate matter: a comparison of measurements and CMAQ model predictions from 2008 to 2012 J. Wilkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18053
6. The impact of aerosol direct radiative effects on PM2.5-related health risk in Northern Hemisphere during 2013–2017 S. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126832
7. A multi-model assessment for the 2006 and 2010 simulations under the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 2 over North America: Part II. Evaluation of column variable predictions using satellite data K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.044
8. Understanding the physical mechanisms of PM2.5 formation in Seoul, Korea: assessing the role of aerosol direct effects using the WRF-CMAQ model J. Yoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01538-x
9. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry–meteorology feedbacks on air quality K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7189-2021
10. The Nord Stream pipeline gas leaks released approximately 220,000 tonnes of methane into the atmosphere M. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100210
11. A reduced form model for ozone based on two decades of CMAQ simulations for the continental United States P. Porter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.09.005
12. Neighborhood-scale air quality, public health, and equity implications of multi-modal vehicle electrification M. Visa et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acf60d
13. The global impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on urban air pollution G. Gkatzelis et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00176
14. Multi-year application of WRF-CAM5 over East Asia-Part I: Comprehensive evaluation and formation regimes of O3 and PM2.5 J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.015
15. Global impact of landscape fire emissions on surface level PM2.5 concentrations, air quality exposure and population mortality G. Roberts & M. Wooster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118210
16. Shifting vehicle management to performance-based for better air quality and health Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140630
17. Wind power forecasting based on hourly wind speed data in South Korea using machine learning algorithms J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1125-3
18. Potential for Electric Vehicle Adoption to Mitigate Extreme Air Quality Events in China J. Schnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001788
19. Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects A. Baklanov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014
20. Application of WRF/Chem-MADRID and WRF/Polyphemus in Europe – Part 1: Model description, evaluation of meteorological predictions, and aerosol–meteorology interactions Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6807-2013
21. A description and evaluation of an air quality model nested within global and regional composition-climate models using MetUM L. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3941-2017
22. Impacts of model resolution on predictions of air quality and associated health exposure in Nanjing, China T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126515
23. Evaluation of meteorological microphysical schemas based on the WRF model for simulation of rainfall in the northeastern region of Iran R. Sarvestan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101524
24. NHM-Chem, the Japan Meteorological Agency's Regional Meteorology – Chemistry Model: Model Evaluations toward the Consistent Predictions of the Chemical, Physical, and Optical Properties of Aerosols M. KAJINO et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-020
25. Detecting urban PM2.5 hotspots with mobile sensing and Gaussian process regression N. Perry et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00038-1
26. Does temperature nudging overwhelm aerosol radiative effects in regional integrated climate models? J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.040
27. Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1749731
28. Sensitivity of feedback effects in CBMZ/MOSAIC chemical mechanism R. San José et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.030
29. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality and neighborhood characteristics in Chicago M. Scannell Bryan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.10.011
30. Intercomparison of multiple two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models (WRF v4.1.1–CMAQ v5.3.1, WRF–Chem v4.1.1, and WRF v3.7.1–CHIMERE v2020r1) in eastern China C. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2471-2024
31. The effectiveness of solar radiation management using fine sea spray across multiple climatic regions Z. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2473-2025
32. Multi-year downscaling application of two-way coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over east Asia for regional climate and air quality modeling: model evaluation and aerosol direct effects C. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2447-2017
33. Effects of Aerosol Emission Reductions on Meteorology and Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing over South Korea Using the WRF-CMAQ Two-way Coupled Model J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2025.41.6.933
34. Source apportionment of Pb-containing particles in Beijing during January 2013 J. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.004
35. Numerical assessment of PM2.5 and O3 air quality in Continental Southeast Asia: Impacts of potential future climate change G. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116901
36. Modeling of the Effects of Wintertime Aerosols on Boundary Layer Properties Over the Indo Gangetic Plain C. Bharali et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029758
37. WRF-GC (v2.0): online two-way coupling of WRF (v3.9.1.1) and GEOS-Chem (v12.7.2) for modeling regional atmospheric chemistry–meteorology interactions X. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3741-2021
38. Aerosols from Fires: An Examination of the Effects on Ozone Photochemistry in the Western United States X. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301541k
39. Evaluation and potential improvements of WRF/CMAQ in simulating multi-levels air pollution in megacity Shanghai, China J. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1342-3
40. Switching to electric vehicles can lead to significant reductions of PM2.5 and NO2 across China L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.008
41. Modeling Reactive Ammonia Uptake by Secondary Organic Aerosol in a Changing Climate: A WRF-CMAQ Evaluation S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.867908
42. Can a coupled meteorology–chemistry model reproduce the historical trend in aerosol direct radiative effects over the Northern Hemisphere? J. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9997-2015
43. The Impact of Foreign SO2 Emissions on Aerosol Direct Radiative Effects in South Korea J. Yoo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11090887
44. Dynamic evaluation of two decades of WRF-CMAQ ozone simulations over the contiguous United States M. Astitha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.020
45. Weakening aerosol direct radiative effects mitigate climate penalty on Chinese air quality C. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0840-y
46. Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications R. Mathur et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017
47. Investigation of aerosol direct effects on meteorology and air quality in East Asia by using an online coupled modeling system G. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.017
48. Modeling of a severe dust event and its impacts on ozone photochemistry over the downstream Nanjing megacity of eastern China M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.010
49. Significant wintertime PM2.5 mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta, China, from 2016 to 2019: observational constraints on anthropogenic emission controls L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14787-2020
50. Impacts of aerosol-radiation feedback on local air quality during a severe haze episode in Nanjing megacity, eastern China M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1339548
51. ESP v2.0: enhanced method for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States – addressing spatial allocation L. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1775-2015
52. Weather condition-based hybrid models for multiple air pollutants forecasting and minimisation C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131610
53. Investigating the regional difference of aerosol feedback effects over South Korea using the WRF-CMAQ two-way coupled modeling system J. Yoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116968
54. Impacts of improved modeling resolution on the simulation of meteorology, air quality, and human exposure to PM2.5, O3 in Beijing, China H. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118574
55. Rapidly evolving aerosol emissions are a dangerous omission from near-term climate risk assessments G. Persad et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/acd6af
56. Performance Evaluation of the Meteorology and Air Quality Conditions From Multiscale WRF‐CMAQ Simulations for the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS) A. Torres‐Vazquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035890
57. Annual application and evaluation of the online coupled WRF–CMAQ system over North America under AQMEII phase 2 C. Hogrefe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.034
58. Assessment of the weather research and forecasting model in simulation of rainfall for Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran R. Sarvestan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09215-4
59. Accounting for the black carbon aging process in a two-way coupled meteorology–air quality model Y. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2613-2025
60. Aerosol-radiation interaction in the operational atmospheric chemistry model GRAPES_Meso5.1/CUACE and its impacts on mesoscale NWP in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China Y. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106402
61. Subgrid-scale aerosol–cloud interaction in the atmospheric chemistry model CMA_Meso5.1/CUACE and its impacts on mesoscale meteorology prediction W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9005-2025
62. Projected changes of extreme weather events in the eastern United States based on a high resolution climate modeling system Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044025
63. Source Apportionment of Urban GHGs in Hong Kong from Regional Transportation Based on Diagnostic Ratio Method Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210099
64. Aircraft landing and takeoff emission impacts on surface O3 and PM2.5 through aerosol direct feedback effects estimated by the coupled WRF-CMAQ model C. Moniruzzaman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117859
65. Assessment of long-term WRF–CMAQ simulations for understanding direct aerosol effects on radiation "brightening" in the United States C. Gan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12193-2015
66. Analysis of meteorology–chemistry interactions during air pollution episodes using online coupled models within AQMEII phase-2 X. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.020
67. Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance C. Emery et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027
68. Investigating Southeast Asian biomass burning by the WRF-CMAQ two-way coupled model: Emission and direct aerosol radiative effects Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119521
69. Assessment of the aerosol optics component of the coupled WRF–CMAQ model using CARES field campaign data and a single column model C. Gan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.028
70. An evaluation of CMAQ NO2 using observed chemistry‐meteorology correlations M. Harkey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023316
71. Ozone sensitivity to high energy demand day electricity and onroad emissions during LISTOS A. Karambelas et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2396400
72. Spatial Distribution of Urban Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions Revealed from the OCO-3 Snapshot XCO2 Observations: A Case Study of Shanghai M. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17061087
73. Short-term aerosol radiative effects and their regional difference during heavy haze episodes in January 2013 in China X. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.040
74. Regulation of open straw burning and residential coal burning around urbanized areas could achieve urban air quality standards in the cold region of northeastern China L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100077
75. Hyperfine-resolution mapping of on-road vehicle emissions with comprehensive traffic monitoring and an intelligent transportation system L. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16985-2021
76. Numerical assessment of PM2.5 and O3 air quality in continental Southeast Asia: Baseline simulation and aerosol direct effects investigation G. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117054
77. Numerical assessment of PM2.5 and O3 air quality in Continental Southeast Asia: Impacts of future projected anthropogenic emission change and its impacts in combination with potential future climate change impacts G. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117398
78. Intercomparison of multiple chemical mechanisms in simulating severe haze event over the North China plain Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121439
79. Inline Coupling of WRF–HYSPLIT: Model Development and Evaluation Using Tracer Experiments F. Ngan et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0247.1
80. Spatio-temporal modelling and related factors analysis of PM2.5 pollution: A case study of Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam L. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103417
81. A multi-model assessment for the 2006 and 2010 simulations under the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) phase 2 over North America: Part I. Indicators of the sensitivity of O3 and PM2.5 formation regimes P. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.026
82. Long-term trends in total inorganic nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the US from 1990 to 2010 Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9091-2018
83. Air Quality and Health Gains from Truck Electrification: Accounting for Feasible Spatial Patterns and Integrated Emission Control R. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00343
84. Striking impacts of biomass burning on PM2.5 concentrations in Northeast China through the emission inventory improvement L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120835
85. Changes in ambient ozone concentrations from urban to remote areas in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic period in April and May, 2020 S. Itahashi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00794-4
86. Direct radiative effects of black carbon and brown carbon from Southeast Asia biomass burning with the WRF-CMAQ two-way coupled model Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125425
87. Impacts of Aerosol Shortwave Radiation Absorption on the Dynamics of an Idealized Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer E. Barbaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9800-7
88. Unexpected air quality impacts from implementation of green infrastructure in urban environments: A Kansas City case study Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140960
89. Meteorological modeling relevant to mesoscale and regional air quality applications: a review R. McNider & A. Pour-Biazar https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1694602
90. Residual emissions may perpetuate community-scale inequalities in US air pollution C. Bergero et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02675-0
91. Unexpected Benefits of Reducing Aerosol Cooling Effects J. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00767
92. High reduction of ozone and particulate matter during the 2016 G-20 summit in Hangzhou by forced emission controls of industry and traffic P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0642-2
93. A Study of Aerosol Impacts on Clouds and Precipitation Development in a Large Winter Cyclone G. Thompson & T. Eidhammer https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1
94. Preface S. Galmarini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.009
95. Direct Aerosol Feedback Effects on Meteorology and Particulate Matter Using the WRF-CMAQ Two-way Coupled Model: A High PM2.5 Event in 2019 J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2025.41.1.083
96. Aerosols in the convective boundary layer: Shortwave radiation effects on the coupled land‐atmosphere system E. Barbaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021237
97. Feedbacks between air pollution and weather, Part 1: Effects on weather P. Makar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.003
98. Vast and hidden urban methane emissions from the Russia–Ukraine war Z. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00309-8
99. Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part II: Particulate matter U. Im et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.072
100. Impact of wildfire on particulate matter in the southeastern United States in November 2016 S. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138354
101. Support tools for land use policies based on high resolution regional air quality modelling N. Ajtai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.022
102. Modelling concentration heterogeneities in streets using the street-network model MUNICH T. Sarica et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5281-2023
103. Simulation of Neighborhood‐Scale Air Quality With Two‐Way Coupled WRF‐CMAQ Over Southern Lake Michigan‐Chicago Region A. Montgomery et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037942
104. Updates to the Noah Land Surface Model in WRF‐CMAQ to Improve Simulated Meteorology, Air Quality, and Deposition P. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001422
105. Numerical simulation of the influence of aerosol radiation effect on urban boundary layer X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-018-9260-0
106. Association of construction with urban air pollution via a wavelet-enhanced ensemble learning framework with explainable AI M. Havaei & H. Malekitabar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scsadv.2026.100093
107. A Multi-Aspect Feature Dependency Screening for Augmentation of Derivative Feature Space Boosting Deep Learning Training: A Case of Air Quality in Subtropical Areas B. Tam et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3657679
108. Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone U. Im et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.042
109. Spatially resolved estimation of ozone-related mortality in the United States under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) and their uncertainty Y. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1290-1
110. Improving air quality through urban form optimization: A review study S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110685
111. BioEarth: Envisioning and developing a new regional earth system model to inform natural and agricultural resource management J. Adam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1115-2
112. Aerosol–cloud interaction in the atmospheric chemistry model GRAPES_Meso5.1/CUACE and its impacts on mesoscale numerical weather prediction under haze pollution conditions in Jing–Jin–Ji in China W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15207-2022
113. Widespread missing super-emitters of nitrogen oxides across China inferred from year-round satellite observations Y. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161157
114. Spatiotemporal variations in solar radiation due to aerosol and cloud radiative effects over the Korean Peninsula J. Yoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108295
115. Evaluating wildfire emissions projection methods in comparisons of simulated and observed air quality U. Shankar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15157-2019
116. Historical Trends in PM 2.5 -Related Premature Mortality during 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP298
117. Quantifying the sensitivity of aerosol optical properties to the parameterizations of physico-chemical processes during the 2010 Russian wildfires and heatwave L. Palacios-Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9679-2020
118. The impact of emission and climate change on ozone in the United States under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9607-2013
119. An Investigation on the use of air quality models in ship emission forecasts G. Kodak https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1425614
120. A novel hybrid clustering model of region segmentation to fuse CMAQ simulations with observations M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119062
121. An online emission module for atmospheric chemistry transport models: implementation in COSMO-GHG v5.6a and COSMO-ART v5.1-3.1 M. Jähn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2379-2020
122. Two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of impacts of aerosol feedbacks on meteorology and air quality C. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5265-2022
123. Continuous-time air pollutant forecasting using multi-timescale attention neural ordinary differential equations (MA-NODE) M. Havaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27903-z
124. Black-carbon-induced regime transition of boundary layer development strongly amplifies severe haze J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.010
125. Air quality modeling in East Asia: present issues and future directions R. Park & S. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0030-9
126. The Impact of the Direct Effect of Aerosols on Meteorology and Air Quality Using Aerosol Optical Depth Assimilation During the KORUS‐AQ Campaign J. Jung et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030641
127. Assessment of NO2 observations during DISCOVER-AQ and KORUS-AQ field campaigns S. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2523-2020
128. The pathway of impacts of aerosol direct effects on secondary inorganic aerosol formation J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5147-2022
129. Assessing the impact of clean air action on air quality trends in Beijing using a machine learning technique T. Vu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11303-2019
130. Enabling high-performance cloud computing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) version 5.3.3: performance evaluation and benefits for the user community C. Efstathiou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7001-2024
131. Numerical Simulation of PM_2.5 in the Atmosphere by Regional Chemical Transport Model H. SHIMADERA https://doi.org/10.3811/jjmf.2018.T007
132. A Multi-model Air Quality System for Health Research: Road model development and evaluation M. Seaton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105455
133. An approach to enhance pnetCDF performance in environmental modeling applications D. Wong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1033-2015
134. Development and Implementation of a Physics‐Based Convective Mixing Scheme in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling Framework A. Pouyaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002475
135. Development of WRF/CUACE v1.0 model and its preliminary application in simulating air quality in China L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-703-2021
136. CMAQ-CNN: A new-generation of post-processing techniques for chemical transport models using deep neural networks A. Sayeed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118961
137. Predicted impact of thermal power generation emission control measures in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region on air pollution over Beijing, China L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19481-0
138. A review of the CAMx, CMAQ, WRF-Chem and NAQPMS models: Application, evaluation and uncertainty factors Z. Gao & X. Zhou https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123183
139. Mitigation of severe urban haze pollution by a precision air pollution control approach S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26344-1
140. Comparison of three aerosol representations of NHM-Chem (v1.0) for the simulations of air quality and climate-relevant variables M. Kajino et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
141. Long-term variations of aerosol optical depth according to satellite data and its effects on radiation and temperature in the Moscow megacity A. Poliukhov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107398
142. Effectiveness of SOx, NOx, and Primary Particulate Matter Control Strategies in the Improvement of Ambient PM Concentration in Taiwan J. Tsai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040460
143. Air quality, health and equity implications of electrifying heavy-duty vehicles S. Camilleri et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01219-0
144. Observation-based estimation of aerosol-induced reduction of planetary boundary layer height J. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6259-8
145. Assessment of aerosol direct effects on PM2.5 and O3 air quality in Continental Southeast Asia G. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/257/1/012001
146. Aerosol indirect effect on the grid-scale clouds in the two-way coupled WRF–CMAQ: model description, development, evaluation and regional analysis S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11247-2014
147. Feedbacks between air pollution and weather, part 2: Effects on chemistry P. Makar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.021
148. Reviewing global estimates of surface reactive nitrogen concentration and deposition using satellite retrievals L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8641-2020
149. New directions: Time for a new approach to modeling surface-atmosphere exchanges in air quality models? R. Saylor & B. Hicks https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.032
150. Intraurban NO2 hotspot detection across multiple air quality products A. Montgomery et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf7d5
151. The role of the atmosphere in the provision of ecosystem services E. Cooter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.077
152. Aerosol–radiation interaction modelling using online coupling between the WRF 3.7.1 meteorological model and the CHIMERE 2016 chemistry-transport model, through the OASIS3-MCT coupler R. Briant et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-927-2017
153. Assessment of the effect of air pollution controls on trends in shortwave radiation over the United States from 1995 through 2010 from multiple observation networks C. Gan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1701-2014
154. Large-scale photovoltaic deployment in the Taklamakan Desert could intensify regional water stress T. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2026.05.005
155. Regional Climate Effects of Biomass Burning and Dust in East Asia: Evidence From Modeling and Observation X. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083894
156. Relative effects of open biomass burning and open crop straw burning on haze formation over central and eastern China: modeling study driven by constrained emissions K. Mehmood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2419-2020
157. Impact of aerosol–meteorology interactions on fine particle pollution during China’s severe haze episode in January 2013 J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094002
158. Novel quantitative framework for evaluating hybrid models in urban air quality prediction: a case study of Hyderabad G. Velusamy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-026-01167-2
159. Development of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modeling D. Wong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024
160. Effect of Aerosol Feedback on Solar Radiation in the Korean Peninsula Using WRF-CMAQ Two-way Coupled Model J. Yoo et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.5.435
161. Emission-driven changes in anthropogenic aerosol concentrations in China during 1970–2010 and its implications for PM2.5 control policy W. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.008
162. Advancing air pollution forecasting: a review of physical, statistical, and machine learning methods A. Rawat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-37789-7
163. New Bidirectional Ammonia Flux Model in an Air Quality Model Coupled With an Agricultural Model J. Pleim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001728
164. Air pollution and climate response to aerosol direct radiative effects: A modeling study of decadal trends across the northern hemisphere J. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023933
165. Ambient air quality and health impacts of PM 2.5 from US residential wood combustion K. Shlipak et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adz0189
166. Assessing the air quality, public health, and equity implications of an Advanced Clean Trucks policy for Illinois V. Lang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-024-1144-8
167. Application of WRF/Chem over East Asia: Part I. Model evaluation and intercomparison with MM5/CMAQ Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.022
168. Impacts of aerosol direct effects on tropospheric ozone through changes in atmospheric dynamics and photolysis rates J. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9869-2017
169. Comprehensive study of aerosols properties over various terrain types N. Srivastava & M. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10536-4
170. Evaluating trends and seasonality in modeled PM2.5 concentrations using empirical mode decomposition H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13801-2020
171. Performance of machine learning for ozone modeling in Southern California during the COVID-19 shutdown K. Do et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00159H
172. The impact of climate change and emissions control on future ozone levels: Implications for human health J. Stowell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.001
173. Current state of aerosol nucleation parameterizations for air-quality and climate modeling K. Semeniuk & A. Dastoor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.039
174. Direct radiative effect of the Russian wildfires and its impact on air temperature and atmospheric dynamics during August 2010 J. Péré et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1999-2014
175. Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5.0 against size-resolved measurements of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America C. Nolte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015
176. Residential emissions predicted as a major source of fine particulate matter in winter over the Yangtze River Delta, China Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0735-6
177. Machine Learning-Based Integration of High-Resolution Wildfire Smoke Simulations and Observations for Regional Health Impact Assessment Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122137
178. Aerosol–radiation feedback deteriorates the wintertime haze in the North China Plain J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8703-2019
179. Long-term trends in the ambient PM2.5- and O3-related mortality burdens in the United States under emission reductions from 1990 to 2010 Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15003-2018
180. Assessing impacts on rice production and quantifying economic cost losses with PM2.5–based damage – A case of the Long Xuyen Quadrangle, Vietnam Mekong Delta L. Ta Bui & P. Hoang Nguyen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108570