Articles | Volume 18, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
28 Oct 2025
Methods for assessment of models |
| 28 Oct 2025
| 28 Oct 2025
A Python diagnostics package for evaluation of Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) teleconnections in subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) forecast systems
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Saisri Kollapaneni
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Andrea M. Jenney
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Jiabao Wang
Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York, USA
Cheng Zheng
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA
School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
Hyemi Kim
Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Chaim I. Garfinkel
The Fredy and Nadine Hermann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Ayush Singh
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
William J. M. Seviour, Justin Finkel, Philip Rupp, Regan Mudhar, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Dong-Chan Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Eun-Pa Lim, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gabriele Messori, Gerbrand Koren, Michael Sigmond, Isla R. Simpson, and Seok-Woo Son
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 1405–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1405-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1405-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Variability of the stratospheric polar vortex is thought to play a role in driving weather extremes, but quantifying this role for a given event has proved challenging. Using a new set of perturbed subseasonal forecast experiments from 7 modelling centres, we determine the stratospheric contribution to the risk and severity of three recent extreme weather events. The forecast-based methodology that we develop is applicable to understanding a range of other drivers of weather extremes.
David Avisar and Chaim I. Garfinkel
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 1331–1348, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1331-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1331-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We use the Large Ensemble Single Forcing simulations to assess the role of individual forcings to the Mediterranean drying and to clarify the dynamical origin of the model’s prediction variability. A more pronounced North Atlantic warming hole, a stronger stratospheric polar vortex, and a larger poleward shift of the subtropical jet correlate with a stronger drying trend. Aerosols had a detectable influence on Mediterranean climate. Hence, their removal may have an impact in future decades.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, David Avisar, Wenjuan Huo, Ales Kuchar, Shoshiro Minobe, Scott Osprey, Katharina Perny, and Jonathon S. Wright
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3738, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3738, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
Whether tropical volcanic eruptions lead to a circulation response in winter is still unclear. We re-evaluate this effect using large ensembles from eight separate models with only one time-varying external forcing: volcanic aerosols. We find that 75 % of models simulate the previously proposed effect, but that the signal requires at least 30 eruptions before it emerges robustly from the noise. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the El Niño signal differs from natural El Niño events.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, David Avisar, Scott M. Osprey, Doug Smith, Jian Rao, and Jonathon S. Wright
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1133-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1133-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Quasi-biennial Oscillation (QBO) dominates variability in the tropical stratosphere, & it impacts surface climate in several parts of the world. However, climate models have been shown to systematically under-estimate the influence of the QBO. Here, we re-evaluate this finding using much larger ensemble sizes than have been previously available based on four separate models. We find that the models are comparatively more successful in capturing QBO influences than reported by previous work.
Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) influences surface climate. By comparing multi-model simulations, we isolated and quantified the role of SSWs. Results reveal that poleward mass transport during SSWs induces high pressure over the Arctic, driving changes in extratropical circulations. While SSWs alter the troposphere, chaotic internal weather variability can amplify or suppress their influence, explaining the differing surface impacts following SSWs.
Qian Lu, Jian Rao, Chunhua Shi, and Chaim I. Garfinkel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 5763–5780, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5763-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5763-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric water vapor has an impact on global temperature changes. Tropical stratospheric water vapor exhibits a clear imprint of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). This study compares the water vapor variations associated with the QBO between boreal winter and summer, and the seasonal difference in the stratospheric water vapor distribution under different QBO phases is revealed.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tiffany Shaw, Benny Keller, Edwin P. Gerber, Ian P. White, Martin Jucker, Wuhan Ning, Ori Adam, and Siming Liu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1767, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1767, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Midlatitude storm tracks are stronger over ocean basins than continents, and also stronger in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere. It is still not clear how Earth's land-ocean distribution, ocean heat transport, and orography, set up this structure. We use an intermediate complexity moist general circulation model to reveal substantial non-additivities in the response to these inhomogeneities, and then diagnose why.
Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Peter Hitchcock, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zac D. Lawrence, Wuhan Ning, Philip Rupp, Zheng Wu, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Martin Jucker, Gerbrand Koren, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gloria L. Manney, Marisol Osman, Masakazu Taguchi, Cory Barton, Dong-Chan Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Jeff Knight, Piero Malguzzi, Daniele Mastrangelo, Jiyoung Oh, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Isla R. Simpson, Seok-Woo Son, Damien Specq, and Tim Stockdale
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 411–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-411-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-411-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are known to follow a sustained wave dissipation in the stratosphere, which depends on both the tropospheric and stratospheric states. However, the relative role of each state is still unclear. Using a new set of subseasonal to seasonal forecasts, we show that the stratospheric state does not drastically affect the precursors of three recent SSWs, but modulates the stratospheric wave activity, with impacts depending on SSW features.
Wuhan Ning, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Judah Cohen, Ian P. White, and Jian Rao
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 277–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-277-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-277-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Whether the zonal structure of a polar vortex matters for surface climate is an open question, with much observational work showing a role but with limited modeling work and demonstration of a causal influence. Here, we isolate this influence using a moist general circulation model. We find that the surface responses differ qualitatively depending on the zonal asymmetries of the shifted polar vortex and concurrently occurring wave reflection events, and provide a mechanistic explanation for why.
Ying Dai, Peter Hitchcock, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, and William J. M. Seviour
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 841–862, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-841-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using a new database of subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) forecasts, we find that with a successful forecast of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW), S2S models can capture the European precipitation signals after the 2018 SSW several weeks in advance. The findings indicate that the stratosphere represents an important source of S2S predictability for precipitation over Europe and call for consideration of stratospheric variability in hydrological prediction at S2S timescales.
Yalalt Nyamgerel, Yeongcheol Han, Soon Do Hur, Hyemi Kim, Songyi Kim, Jangil Moon, Barbara Stenni, and Jeonghoon Lee
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2408, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2408, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research explores climate patterns recorded in Antarctic ice over the past two centuries. By analyzing ice layers, we identified connections between Antarctica's climate and tropical ocean conditions. Results show changing influences over time and highlight the Indian Ocean's key role in Antarctic snowfall. This improves understanding of how polar and tropical climates interact, crucial for future climate predictions.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Cheng Zheng, Yutian Wu, Mingfang Ting, and Clara Orbe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6965–6985, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6965-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6965-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases and aerosols in the Arctic, which typically originate from midlatitude and tropical emission regions, modulate the Arctic climate via their radiative and chemistry impacts. Thus, long-range transport of these substances is important for understanding the current and the future change of Arctic climate. By employing chemistry–climate models, we explore how year-to-year variations in the atmospheric circulation modulate atmospheric long-range transport into the Arctic.
Molly E. Menzel, Darryn W. Waugh, Zheng Wu, and Thomas Reichler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 251–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent work exploring the tropical atmospheric circulation response to climate change has revealed a disconnect in the latitudinal location of two features, the subtropical jet and the Hadley cell edge. Here, we investigate if the surprising result from coupled climate model and meteorological reanalysis output is consistent across model complexity.
Raphaël de Fondeville, Zheng Wu, Enikő Székely, Guillaume Obozinski, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 287–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-287-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a fully data-driven, interpretable, and computationally scalable framework to characterize sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), extract statistically significant precursors, and produce machine learning (ML) forecasts. By successfully leveraging the long-lasting impact of SSWs, the ML predictions outperform sub-seasonal numerical forecasts for lead times beyond 25 d. Post-processing numerical predictions using their ML counterparts yields a performance increase of up to 20 %.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Rachel Wai-Ying Wu, Zheng Wu, and Daniela I.V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 755–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-755-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-755-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate predictions of the stratospheric polar vortex can enhance surface weather predictability. Stratospheric events themselves are less predictable, with strong inter-event differences. We assess the predictability of stratospheric acceleration and deceleration events in a sub-seasonal prediction system, finding that the predictability of events is largely dependent on event magnitude, while extreme drivers of deceleration events are not fully represented in the model.
Peter Hitchcock, Amy Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tim Stockdale, James Anstey, Dann Mitchell, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Daniele Mastrangelo, Piero Malguzzi, Hai Lin, Ryan Muncaster, Bill Merryfield, Michael Sigmond, Baoqiang Xiang, Liwei Jia, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Jiyoung Oh, Damien Specq, Isla R. Simpson, Jadwiga H. Richter, Cory Barton, Jeff Knight, Eun-Pa Lim, and Harry Hendon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5073–5092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes an experimental protocol focused on sudden stratospheric warmings to be carried out by subseasonal forecast modeling centers. These will allow for inter-model comparisons of these major disruptions to the stratospheric polar vortex and their impacts on the near-surface flow. The protocol will lead to new insights into the contribution of the stratosphere to subseasonal forecast skill and new approaches to the dynamical attribution of extreme events.
Chen Schwartz, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Priyanka Yadav, Wen Chen, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 679–692, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eleven operational forecast models that run on subseasonal timescales (up to 2 months) are examined to assess errors in their simulated large-scale stationary waves in the Northern Hemisphere winter. We found that models with a more finely resolved stratosphere generally do better in simulating the waves in both the stratosphere (10–50 km) and troposphere below. Moreover, a connection exists between errors in simulated time-mean convection in tropical regions and errors in the simulated waves.
Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Sean Davis, and Antara Banerjee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7523–7538, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7523-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7523-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric water vapor is important for Earth's overall greenhouse effect and for ozone chemistry; however the factors governing its variability on interannual timescales are not fully known, and previous modeling studies have indicated that models struggle to capture this interannual variability. We demonstrate that nonlinear interactions are important for determining overall water vapor concentrations and also that models have improved in their ability to capture these connections.
Adam A. Scaife, Mark P. Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Eun-Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok-Woo Son, and David W. J. Thompson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2601–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Zheng Wu, Bernat Jiménez-Esteve, Raphaël de Fondeville, Enikő Székely, Guillaume Obozinski, William T. Ball, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 841–865, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-841-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-841-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use an advanced statistical approach to investigate the dynamics of the development of sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) events in the winter Northern Hemisphere. We identify distinct signals that are representative of these events and their event type at lead times beyond currently predictable lead times. The results can be viewed as a promising step towards improving the predictability of SSWs in the future by using more advanced statistical methods in operational forecasting systems.
Cited articles
Adams, J. C. and Swartztrauber, P. N.: SPHEREPACK 3.0: A model development facility, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 1872–1878, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1872:SAMDF>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Baldwin, M. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 30937–30946, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900445, 1999.
Baldwin, M. P., Ayarzagüena, B., Birner, T., Butchart, N., Butler, A. H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Garny, H., Gerber, E. P., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden stratospheric warmings, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000708, 2021.
Cassou, C.: Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation, Nature, 455, 523–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286, 2008.
Charlton, A. J. and Polvani, L. M.: A new look at sudden stratospheric warmings: Part I: Climatology and modeling benchmarks. J. Climate, 20, 449–469, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3996.1, 2007.
Charlton-Perez, A. J. and Polvani L. M.: CORRIGENDUM, J. Climate, 24, 5951, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00348.1, 2011.
Charney, J. G. and Drazin, P. G.: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83–109, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i001p00083, 1961.
Chen, P. and Robinson, W. A.: Propagation of planetary waves between troposphere and stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 2533–2545, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2533:POPWBT>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Collier, N., Hoffman, F. M., Lawrence, D. M., Keppel-Aleks, G., Koven, C. D., Riley W. J., Mu, M., and Randerson, J. T.: The international land model benchmarking (ILAMB) system: Design, theory, and implementation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2731–2754, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001354, 2018.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N. and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
Eaton, B., Gregory, J., Drach, B., Taylor, K., Hankin, S., Caron, J., Signell, R., Bentley, P., Rappa, G., Höck, H., Pamment, A., Juckes, M., Raspaud, M. Blower, J., Horne, R., Whiteaker, T., Blodgett, D., Zender, C., Lee, D., Hassell, D., Snow, A. D., Kölling, T., Allured, D., Jelenak, A., Soerensen, A. M., Gaultier, L., Herlédan, S., Manzano, F., Bärring, L., Barker, C. and Bartholomew, S. L. : NetCDF Climate and Forecast (CF) Metadata Conventions (1.12-draft). CF Community, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14275599, 2024.
Enomoto, T., Hoskins, B. J., and Matsuda, Y.: The formation mechanism of the Bonin high in August, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 157–178, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.01.211, 2003.
Garfinkel, C., Wu, Z., Yadav, P., Lawrence, Z., Domeisen, D., Zheng, Z., Wang, J., Jenney, A., Kim, H., Schwartz, C., and Stan, C.: The impact of vertical model levels on the prediction of MJO teleconnections. Part 2: The stratospheric pathway in the UFS global coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 63, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07512-8, 2024.
Glecker, P. J., Taylor, K. E., and Doutrix, C.: Performance metrics for climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008972, 2008.
Glecker, P. J., Doutriaux, C., Durack, P. J., Taylor, K. E., Zhang, Y., Williams, D. N., Mason, E., and Servonnat, J.: A more powerful reality test for climate models, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., 97, https://doi.org/10.1029/2016eo051663, 2016.
Green, M. R. and Furtado, J. C.: Evaluating the joint influence of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the stratospheric polar vortex on weather patterns in the Northern Hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11693–11709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030771 2019.
Gottschalk, J., Wheeler, M., Weickmann, K., Vitart, F., Savage, N., Lin, H., Hendon, H., Waliser, D., Sperber, K., Prestrelo, C., Nakagawa, M., Flatau, M., and Higgins, W.: A framework for assessing operational model MJO forecasts: A project of the CLIVAR Madden – Julian Oscillation Working Group, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1247–1258, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2816.1, 2010.
Higgins, W., Schemm, J., Shi, W., and Leetmaa, A.: Extreme precipitation events in the western United States related to tropical forcing, J. Climate, 13, 793–820, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0793:EPEITW>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Hoskins, B. J. and Ambrizzi, T.: Rossby wave propagation on a realistic longitudinal varying flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1661:RWPOAR>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Huffman, G., Bolvin, D., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K., Joyce, R., and Xie, P.: Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), version 4.4, NASA's Precipitation Processing Center, ftp://arthurhou.pps.eosdis.nasa.gov/gpmdata/ (last access: 31 March 2015), 2014.
Jenney, A. M., Randall, D. A., and Barnes, E. A.: Quantifying regional sensitivity to periodic events: Application to the MJO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3671–3683, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029457, 2019.
Jin, F.-F. and Hoskins, B. J.: The direct response to tropical heating in a baroclinic atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 307–319, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0307:TDRTTH>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Johnson, N. C., Collins, D. C., Feldstein, S. B., L'Heureux, M. L., and Riddle, E. E.: Skillful Wintertime North American Temperature Forecasts out to 4 Weeks Based on the State of ENSO and the MJO, Weather Forecast., 29, 23–38, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00102.1, 2014.
Kunkel, K. E., Easterling, D. R., Kristovich, D. A., Gleason, B., Stoecker, L., and Smith, R.: Meteorological causes of the secular variations in observed extreme precipitation events for the conterminous United States, J. Hydrometeor., 13, 1131–1141, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0108.1, 2012.
Lee, J., Glecker, P. J., Ahn, M. -S., Ordonez, A., Ullrich, P. A., Sperber, K. R., Taylor, K. E., Planton, Y. Y., Guilyardi, E., Durack, P. Bonfils, C., Zelinka, M. D., Chao, L. -W., Doutriaux, C. Zhang, C., Vo, T., Boutte, J., Whehner, M. F., Pendergrass, A. G., Kim., D., Xue, Z., Wittenberg, A. T., and Krasting, J.: Systematic and objective evaluation of the Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, 2024.
Liebman, B. and Smith, C. A.: Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing longwave ration dataset, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 1275–1277, 1996.
Limpasuvan, V., Thompson, D. W., and Hartmann, D. L.: The lifecycle of the Northern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric warmings, J. Climate, 17, 2584–2596, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2584:TLCOTN>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Lin, H., Brunet, G., and Derome, J.: An observed connection between the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 22, 364–380, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2525.1, 2009.
Ma, C. and Chang, E. K.: Impacts of storm-track variations on wintertime extreme weather events over the continental United States, J. Climate, 30, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0560.1 2017.
Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R.: Detection of a 40–50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702–708, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0702:DOADOI>2.0.CO;2, 1971.
Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R.: Description on the global-scale circulation cells in the thttps://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1109:DOGSCC>2.0.CO;2, 1972.
Maher, N., Phillips, A. S., Deser, C., Wills, R. C. J., Lehner, F., Fasullo, J., Caron, J. M., Brunner, L., Beyerle, U., and Jeffree, J.: The updated Multi-Model Large Ensemble Archive and the Climate Variability Diagnostics Package: new tools for the study of climate variability and change, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6341–6365, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6341-2025, 2025.
Mori, M. and Watanabe, M.: The growth and triggering mechanisms of the PNA: A MJO-PNA coherence, J. Meteorol. Soc., Japan, 86, 213–236, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.86.213, 2008.
Neelin, J. D., Krasting, J. P., Radhakrishnan, A., Liptak, J., Jackson, T., Ming, Y., Dong, W., Gettelman, A., Coleman, D. R., Maloney, E. D., Wing, A. A., Kuo, Y.-H., Ahmed, F., Ullrich, P., Bitz, C. M., Neale, R., Ordonez, A., and Maroon, E. A.: Process-oriented diagnostics: Principles, practice, community development, and common standards. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E1452–E1468, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0268.1, 2023.
Oehrlein, J., Chiodo, G., and Polvani, L. M.: The effect of interactive ozone chemistry on weak and strong stratospheric polar vortex events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10531–10544, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10531-2020, 2020.
Phillips, A. S., Deser, C., and Fasullo, J.: Evaluating modes of variability in climate models, Eos, 49, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO490002, 2014.
Plumb, R. A.: On the three-dimensional propagation of stationary waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 217–229, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0217:OTTDPO>2.0.CO;2, 1985.
Polvani, L. M. and Kushner, P. J.: Tropospheric response to stratospheric perturbations in a relatively simple general circulation model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014284, 2002.
Polvani, L. M. and Waugh, D. W.: Upward wave activity flux as a precursor to extreme stratospheric events and subsequent anomalous surface weather regimes, J. Climate, 17, 3548–3554, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3548:UWAFAA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Rashid, H. A., Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., and Alves, O.: Prediction of the Madden-Julian oscillation with the POMA dynamical prediction system, Clim. Dynam., 36, 649–611, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0754-x, 2011.
Riddle, E. E., Stoner, M. B., Johnson, N. C., L'Heureux, M. L., Collins, D. C., and Feldstein, S. B.: The impact of the MJO on clusters of wintertime circulation anomalies over the North American region, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1749–1766, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1493-y, 2013.
Sardeshmukh, P. D. and Hoskins, B. J.: The generation of global rotational flow by steady idealized tropical divergence, J Atmos. Sci., 45, 1228–1251, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<1228:TGOGRF>2.0.CO;2, 1988.
Schwartz, C. and Garfinkel, C. I.: Relative roles of the MJO and stratospheric variability in North Atlantic and European winter climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 22, 4184–4201, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025829, 2017.
Smith, K. L., Polvani, L. M., and Tremblay, L. B.: The impact of stratospheric circulation extremes on minimum arctic sea ice extent, J. Climate, 31, 7169–7183, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0495.1, 2018.
Stan, C., Straus, D. M., Frederiksen, J. S., Lin, H., Maloney, E. D., and Schumacher, C.: Review of tropical-extratropical teleconnections on intraseasonal time scales, Rev. Geophysics, 55, 902–937, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000538, 2017.
Stan, C., Zheng, C., Chang, E. K.-M., Domeisen D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Jenney, A. M., Kim, H., Lim, Y.-K., Lin, A., Robertson, A., Schwartz, C., Vitart, F., Wang, J., and Yadav, P.: Advances in the prediction of MJO teleconnections in the S2S forecast systems, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E1426–E1447, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0130.1, 2022.
Stan, C., Kollapaneni, S., Jenney, A., Wang, J., Wu, Z., Zheng, C., Kim, H., Garfinkel, C., and Singh, A.: pyMTDG v1.0.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15002615, 2025.
Takaya, K. and Nakamura, H.: A formulation of a phase-independent wave activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 608–627, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0608:AFOAPI>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Teng, H. and Branstator, G.: Amplification of waveguide teleconnections in the boreal summer, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 5, 421–432, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00150-x, 2019.
Vitart, F. Ardilouze, C., Bonet, A. Brookshaw, A., Chen, M., Codorean, C., Déqué, M., Ferranti, L., Fucile, E., Fuentes, M., Hendon, H., Hodgson, J., Kang, H.-S., Kumar, A., Lin, H., Liu, X., Malguzzi, P., Mallas, I., Manoussakis, M., Mastrangelo, D., MacLachlan, C., McLEan, P., Minami, A., Mladek, R., Nakazawa, T., Najm, S., Nie, Y., Rixen, M., Robertson, A. W., Ruti, P., Sun, C., Takaya, Y., Tolstykh, M., Venuti, F., Waliser, D., Woolnough, S., Wu, T., Xiao, H., Zaripov, R., and Zhang, L.: The subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0017.1, 2017.
Wang, B. and Xie, X.: Low-frequency equatorial waves in vertically sheared zonal flow. Part I: Stable waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 449–467, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0449:LFEWIV>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Wang, J., Kim, H. M., Kim, D., Henderson, S. A., Stan, C., and Maloney, E. D.: MJO teleconnections over the PNA region in climate models. Part I: Performance- and process-based skill metrics, J. Climate, 33, 1051–1067, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0253.1, 2020.
Wang, J., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Jenney, A. M., Kim, H., Wu, Z., Zheng, C., and Stan, C.: The potential impacts of improved MJO prediction on the prediction of MJO teleconnections in the UFS global fully coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-025-07783-9, 2025.
Weinberger, I., Garfinkel, C. I., Harnik, N., and Paldor, N.: Transmission and reflection of upward-propagating Rossby waves in the lowermost stratosphere: Importance of the tropopause inversion layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 3263–3274, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-22-0025.1, 2022.
Wheeler, M. C. and Hendon, H. H.: An all-season real-time multivariate MJO index: Development of an index for monitoring and prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1917–1932, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1917:AARMMI>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Whitaker, J.: Python Spherical harmonic transform module, https://pypi.org/project/pyspharm/ (last access: 28 September 2023), 2020.
White, I. P., Garfinkel, C. I., Gerber, E. P., Jucker, M., Aquila, V., and Oman, L. D.: The downward influence of sudden stratospheric warmings: Association with tropospheric precursors, J. Climate, 32, 85–108, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0053.1, 2019.
Yadav, P. and Straus, D. M.: Circulation response to fast and slow MJO episodes, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 1577–1596, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0352.1, 2017.
Yadav, P., Straus, D. M., and Swenson, E. T.: The Euro-Atlantic circulation response to the Madden-Julian Oscillation cycle of tropical heating: Coupled GCM intervention experiments, Atmos.-Ocean., 57, 161–181, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2019.1626214, 2019.
Yadav, P., Garfinkel, C. I., and Domeisen, D. I. V.: The role of the stratosphere in teleconnections arising from fast and slow MJO episodes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL104826, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104826, 2024.
Yoneyama, K. and Zhang, C.: Years of the Maritime Continent, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087182, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087182, 2020.
Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, RG2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158, 2005.
Zheng, C., Chang, E. K.-M., Kim, H. M., Zhang, M., and Wang, W.: Impacts of the Madden-Julian oscillation on storm-track activity, surface air temperature, and precipitation over North America, J. Climate, 31, 6113–6134, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0534.1, 2018.
Zheng, C., Daniela, I. V., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Jenney, A. M., Kim, H., Wang, J., Wu, Z., and Stan, C.: The impact of vertical model levels on the prediction of MJO teleconnections. Part I: The tropospheric pathways in the UFS global coupled model, Clim. Dynam., 62, 9031–9056, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07377-x, 2024.
Zhou, S., L'Heureux, M., Weaver, S., and Kumar, A.: A composite study of MJO influence on the surface air temperature and precipitation over the Continental United States, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1459–1471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1001-9, 2012.
Short summary
The diagnostics package is an open-source Python software package used for evaluating the Madden–Julian Oscillation teleconnections to the extratropics, as predicted by subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) forecast systems.
The diagnostics package is an open-source Python software package used for evaluating the...
