Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6597-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6597-2025
Model evaluation paper
 | 
29 Sep 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 29 Sep 2025

Impact of topography and meteorological forcing on snow simulation in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC)

Libo Wang, Lawrence Mudryk, Joe R. Melton, Colleen Mortimer, Jason Cole, Gesa Meyer, Paul Bartlett, and Mickaël Lalande

Data sets

Impact of topography and meteorological forcing on snow simulation in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC) L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15032447

Model code and software

Impact of topography and meteorological forcing on snow simulation in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC) L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15032447

Download
Short summary
This study shows that an alternate snow cover fraction parameterization significantly improves snow simulation by CLASSIC in mountainous areas for all three choices of meteorological datasets. Annual mean bias, unbiased root mean squared area, and correlation improve by 75 %, 32 %, and 7 % when evaluated with MODIS observations over the Northern Hemisphere. We also link relative biases in the meteorological forcing data to differences in simulated snow water equivalent and snow cover fraction.
Share