Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3559-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3559-2025
Model evaluation paper
 | 
18 Jun 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 18 Jun 2025

Diagnosis of winter precipitation types using the spectral bin model (version 1DSBM-19M): comparison of five methods using ICE-POP 2018 field experiment data

Wonbae Bang, Jacob T. Carlin, Kwonil Kim, Alexander V. Ryzhkov, Guosheng Liu, and GyuWon Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 2,474 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,009 277 188 2,474 59 115
  • HTML: 2,009
  • PDF: 277
  • XML: 188
  • Total: 2,474
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,474 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,455 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Microphysics model-based diagnosis, such as the spectral bin model (SBM), has recently been attempted to diagnose winter precipitation types. In this study, the accuracy of SBM-based precipitation type diagnosis is compared with other traditional methods. SBM has a relatively higher accuracy for dry-snow and wet-snow events, whereas it has lower accuracy for rain events. When the microphysics scheme in the SBM was optimized for the corresponding region, the accuracy for rain events improved.
Share