Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
Model evaluation paper
 | 
27 May 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 27 May 2025

CMIP6 models overestimate sea ice melt, growth and conduction relative to ice mass balance buoy estimates

Alex E. West and Edward W. Blockley

Viewed

Total article views: 3,326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,729 418 179 3,326 82 164
  • HTML: 2,729
  • PDF: 418
  • XML: 179
  • Total: 3,326
  • BibTeX: 82
  • EndNote: 164
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,278 with geography defined and 48 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
This study uses ice mass balance buoys – temperature- and height-measuring devices frozen into sea ice – to find how well climate models simulate (1) melt and growth of Arctic sea ice and (2) conduction of heat through Arctic sea ice. This may help understand why models produce varying amounts of sea ice in the present day. We find that models tend to show more melt, growth or conduction for a given ice thickness than the buoys, although the difference is smaller for models with more physically realistic thermodynamics.
Read more
Share