Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
21 Jan 2025
Model description paper |
| 21 Jan 2025
| 21 Jan 2025
Forecasting contrail climate forcing for flight planning and air traffic management applications: the CocipGrid model in pycontrails 0.51.0
Zebediah Engberg
Breakthrough Energy, 4110 Carillon Point, Kirkland, WA 98033, United States
Roger Teoh
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Tristan Abbott
Breakthrough Energy, 4110 Carillon Point, Kirkland, WA 98033, United States
Thomas Dean
Breakthrough Energy, 4110 Carillon Point, Kirkland, WA 98033, United States
Marc E. J. Stettler
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Marc L. Shapiro
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Breakthrough Energy, 4110 Carillon Point, Kirkland, WA 98033, United States
Related authors
Roger Teoh, Zebediah Engberg, Ulrich Schumann, Christiane Voigt, Marc Shapiro, Susanne Rohs, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6071–6093, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The radiative forcing (RF) due to aviation contrails is comparable to that caused by CO2. We estimate that global contrail net RF in 2019 was 62.1 mW m−2. This is ~1/2 the previous best estimate for 2018. Contrail RF varies regionally due to differences in conditions required for persistent contrails. COVID-19 reduced contrail RF by 54% in 2020 relative to 2019. Globally, 2 % of all flights account for 80 % of the annual contrail energy forcing, suggesting a opportunity to mitigate contrail RF.
Roger Teoh, Zebediah Engberg, Marc Shapiro, Lynnette Dray, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 725–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-725-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Emissions from aircraft contribute to climate change and degrade air quality. We describe an up-to-date 4D emissions inventory of global aviation from 2019 to 2021 based on actual flown trajectories. In 2019, 40.2 million flights collectively travelled 61 billion kilometres using 283 Tg of fuel. Long-haul flights were responsible for 43 % of CO2. The emissions inventory is made available for use in future studies to evaluate the negative externalities arising from global aviation.
Oliver G. A. Driver, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Edward Gryspeerdt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2737, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2737, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Contrails are ice clouds caused by planes. In humid (ice supersaturated) regions ice crystals are stable, and clouds persist. Contrails have a warming effect, so it is important to model them. However, weather model data is unable to represent ice supersaturated regions well enough. We demonstrate that ice supersaturation modelling is structured by North Atlantic storm systems. We link the bias to underling processes being modelled, and gain insight into how the existing data could be used.
Joel Ponsonby, Roger Teoh, Bernd Kärcher, and Marc Stettler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1717, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1717, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol emissions from aircraft engines contribute to the formation of contrails, which have a climate impact comparable to that of aviation’s CO2 emissions. We show that emissions of volatile particulate matter – from fuel sulphur, unburned fuel, and lubrication oil – can increase the number of ice particles formed within a contrail, and therefore have an important role in the climate impacts of aviation. This has implications for emissions regulation and climate mitigation strategies.
Oliver G. A. Driver, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1115–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Contrails (clouds caused by planes) play a large role in the climate warming caused by aviation. Satellites are a good tool to validate modelled impact estimates. Many contrails are either too narrow or too disperse to detect. This work shows that only around half of contrails are observable but that the most climatically important are easier to detect. It supports the use of satellites for contrail observation but highlights the need for observability considerations for specific applications.
Jade Low, Roger Teoh, Joel Ponsonby, Edward Gryspeerdt, Marc Shapiro, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 37–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The radiative forcing due to contrails is of the same order of magnitude as aviation CO2 emissions but has a higher uncertainty. Observations are vital to improve our understanding of the contrail lifecycle, improve models, and measure the effect of mitigation action. Here, we use ground-based cameras combined with flight telemetry to track visible contrails and measure their lifetime and width. We evaluate model predictions and demonstrate the capability of this approach.
Audran Borella, Olivier Boucher, Keith P. Shine, Marc Stettler, Katsumasa Tanaka, Roger Teoh, and Nicolas Bellouin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9401–9417, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9401-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies how to compare the climate impact of the CO2 emitted and contrails formed by a flight. This is applied to contrail avoidance strategies that would decrease climate impact of flights by changing the trajectory of aircraft to avoid persistent contrail formation, at the risk of increasing CO2 emissions. We find that different comparison methods lead to different quantification of the total climate impact of a flight but lead to similar decisions of whether to reroute an aircraft.
Roger Teoh, Zebediah Engberg, Ulrich Schumann, Christiane Voigt, Marc Shapiro, Susanne Rohs, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6071–6093, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The radiative forcing (RF) due to aviation contrails is comparable to that caused by CO2. We estimate that global contrail net RF in 2019 was 62.1 mW m−2. This is ~1/2 the previous best estimate for 2018. Contrail RF varies regionally due to differences in conditions required for persistent contrails. COVID-19 reduced contrail RF by 54% in 2020 relative to 2019. Globally, 2 % of all flights account for 80 % of the annual contrail energy forcing, suggesting a opportunity to mitigate contrail RF.
Joel Ponsonby, Leon King, Benjamin J. Murray, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2045–2058, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2045-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2045-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol emissions from aircraft engines contribute to the formation of contrails, which have a climate impact as important as that of aviation’s CO2 emissions. For the first time, we experimentally investigate the freezing behaviour of water droplets formed on jet lubrication oil aerosol. We show that they can activate to form water droplets and discuss their potential impact on contrail formation. Our study has implications for contrails produced by future aircraft engine and fuel technologies.
Roger Teoh, Zebediah Engberg, Marc Shapiro, Lynnette Dray, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 725–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-725-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Emissions from aircraft contribute to climate change and degrade air quality. We describe an up-to-date 4D emissions inventory of global aviation from 2019 to 2021 based on actual flown trajectories. In 2019, 40.2 million flights collectively travelled 61 billion kilometres using 283 Tg of fuel. Long-haul flights were responsible for 43 % of CO2. The emissions inventory is made available for use in future studies to evaluate the negative externalities arising from global aviation.
Roger Teoh, Ulrich Schumann, Edward Gryspeerdt, Marc Shapiro, Jarlath Molloy, George Koudis, Christiane Voigt, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10919–10935, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10919-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10919-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aircraft condensation trails (contrails) contribute to over half of the climate forcing attributable to aviation. This study uses historical air traffic and weather data to simulate contrails in the North Atlantic over 5 years, from 2016 to 2021. We found large intra- and inter-year variability in contrail radiative forcing and observed a 66 % reduction due to COVID-19. Most warming contrails predominantly result from night-time flights in winter.
Ulrich Schumann, Ian Poll, Roger Teoh, Rainer Koelle, Enrico Spinielli, Jarlath Molloy, George S. Koudis, Robert Baumann, Luca Bugliaro, Marc Stettler, and Christiane Voigt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7429–7450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The roughly 70 % reduction of air traffic during the COVID-19 pandemic from March–August 2020 compared to 2019 provides a test case for the relationship between air traffic density, contrails, and their radiative forcing of climate change. This paper investigates the induced traffic and contrail changes in a model study. Besides strong weather changes, the model results indicate aviation-induced cirrus and top-of-the-atmosphere irradiance changes, which can be tested with observations.
Cited articles
Agarwal, A., Meijer, V. R., Eastham, S. D., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Reanalysis-driven simulations may overestimate persistent contrail formation by 100–250 %, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AC38D9, 2022.
Bickel, M.: Climate Impact of Contrail Cirrus, PhD thesis/dissertation, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, https://doi.org/10.57676/MZMG-R403, 2023.
Bickel, M., Ponater, M., Bock, L., Burkhardt, U., and Reineke, S.: Estimating the Effective Radiative Forcing of Contrail Cirrus, J. Climate, 33, 1991–2005, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0467.1, 2019.
Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Impact of Parametrizing Microphysical Processes in the Jet and Vortex Phase on Contrail Cirrus Properties and Radiative Forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036677, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677, 2022.
Borella, A., Boucher, O., Shine, K. P., Stettler, M., Tanaka, K., Teoh, R., and Bellouin, N.: The importance of an informed choice of CO2-equivalence metrics for contrail avoidance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9401–9417, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9401-2024, 2024.
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V. M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols. In Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., 571–657, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016, 2013.
Bräuer, T., Voigt, C., Sauer, D., Kaufmann, S., Hahn, V., Scheibe, M., Schlager, H., Diskin, G. S., Nowak, J. B., DiGangi, J. P., Huber, F., Moore, R. H., and Anderson, B. E.: Airborne Measurements of Contrail Ice Properties – Dependence on Temperature and Humidity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092166, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092166, 2021.
Breakthrough Energy: Contrails API, Breakthrough Energy [data set], https://api.contrails.org (last access: 10 January 2025), 2025a.
Breakthrough Energy: Contrails Navigator, Breakthrough Energy [data set], https://nav.contrails.org (last access: 10 January 2025), 2025b.
Caiazzo, F., Agarwal, A., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Impact of biofuels on contrail warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 114013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa893b, 2017.
Chen, C.-C. and Gettelman, A.: Simulated radiative forcing from contrails and contrail cirrus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12525–12536, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12525-2013, 2013.
Dietmüller, S., Matthes, S., Dahlmann, K., Yamashita, H., Simorgh, A., Soler, M., Linke, F., Lührs, B., Meuser, M. M., Weder, C., Grewe, V., Yin, F., and Castino, F.: A Python library for computing individual and merged non-CO2 algorithmic climate change functions: CLIMaCCF V1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4405–4425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4405-2023, 2023.
Driver, O. G. A., Stettler, M. E. J., and Gryspeerdt, E.: Factors limiting contrail detection in satellite imagery, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2198, 2024.
Duda, D. P., Bedka, S. T., Minnis, P., Spangenberg, D., Khlopenkov, K., Chee, T., and Smith Jr., W. L.: Northern Hemisphere contrail properties derived from Terra and Aqua MODIS data for 2006 and 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5313–5330, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5313-2019, 2019.
EASA: ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank (07/2021), EASA, https://www.easa.europa.eu/domains/environment/icao-aircraft-engine-emissions-databank (last access: 15 February 2022), 2021.
ECMWF: Atmospheric Model high resolution 10-day forecast (Set I – HRES), ECMWF, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/set-i (last access: 17 April 2024), 2024.
Edwards, H. A., Dixon-Hardy, D., and Wadud, Z.: Aircraft cost index and the future of carbon emissions from air travel, Appl. Energy, 164, 553–562, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.11.058, 2016.
Elkin, C. and Sanekommu, D.: How AI is helping airlines mitigate the climate impact of contrails, Google, https://blog.google/technology/ai/ai-airlines-contrails-climate-change/ (last access: 12 March 2024), 2023.
European Commission: Directive (EU) 2023/958 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023, European Commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023L0958 (last access: 6 May 2024), 2023.
Filippone, A.: Assessment of aircraft contrail avoidance strategies, J. Aircr., 52, 872–877, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033176, 2015.
Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: The role of plume-scale processes in long-term impacts of aircraft emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5697–5727, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5697-2020, 2020.
Frömming, C., Grewe, V., Brinkop, S., Jöckel, P., Haslerud, A. S., Rosanka, S., van Manen, J., and Matthes, S.: Influence of weather situation on non-CO2 aviation climate effects: the REACT4C climate change functions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9151–9172, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9151-2021, 2021.
Gaillot, T., Beauchet, S., Lorne, D., and Krim, L.: The impact of fossil jet fuel emissions at altitude on climate change: A life cycle assessment study of a long-haul flight at different time horizons, Atmos. Environ., 311, 119983, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2023.119983, 2023.
Geraedts, S., Brand, E., Dean, T. R., Eastham, S., Elkin, C., Engberg, Z., Hager, U., Langmore, I., McCloskey, K., Yue-Hei Ng, J., Platt, J. C., Sankar, T., Sarna, A., Shapiro, M., and Goyal, N.: A scalable system to measure contrail formation on a per-flight basis, Environ. Res. Commun., 6, 015008, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/AD11AB, 2024.
Gettelman, A., Chen, C.-C., and Bardeen, C. G.: The climate impact of COVID-19-induced contrail changes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9405–9416, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9405-2021, 2021.
Gierens, K., Matthes, S., and Rohs, S.: How Well Can Persistent Contrails Be Predicted?, Aerospace, 7, 169, https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE7120169, 2020.
Grewe, V., Frömming, C., Matthes, S., Brinkop, S., Ponater, M., Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Tsati, E., Dahlmann, K., Søvde, O. A., Fuglestvedt, J., Berntsen, T. K., Shine, K. P., Irvine, E. A., Champougny, T., and Hullah, P.: Aircraft routing with minimal climate impact: the REACT4C climate cost function modelling approach (V1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 175–201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014, 2014.
Grewe, V., Matthes, S., Frömming, C., Brinkop, S., Jöckel, P., Gierens, K., Champougny, T., Fuglestvedt, J., Haslerud, A., and Irvine, E.: Feasibility of climate-optimized air traffic routing for trans-Atlantic flights, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 34003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ba0, 2017.
Haywood, J. M., Allan, R. P., Bornemann, J., Forster, P. M., Francis, P. N., Milton, S., Rädel, G., Rap, A., Shine, K. P., and Thorpe, R.: A case study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into contrail-induced cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D24201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012650, 2009.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hofer, S., Gierens, K., and Rohs, S.: How well can persistent contrails be predicted? An update, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7911–7925, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7911-2024, 2024.
Holzapfel, F.: Probabilistic Two-Phase Wake Vortex Decay and Transport Model, J. Aircr., 40, 323–331, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3096, 2003.
ICAO: Air Traffic Management – Procedures for Air Navigation Services, International Civil Aviation Organisation, http://flightservicebureau.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ICAO-Doc4444-Pans-Atm-16thEdition-2016-OPSGROUP.pdf (last access: 6 May 2024), Montreal, Canada, 2016.
Jeßberger, P., Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Sölch, I., Schlager, H., Kaufmann, S., Petzold, A., Schäuble, D., and Gayet, J.-F.: Aircraft type influence on contrail properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11965–11984, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11965-2013, 2013.
Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat. Commun., 9, 1824, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0, 2018.
Kärcher, B. and Yu, F.: Role of aircraft soot emissions in contrail formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036649, 2009.
Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Bier, A., Bock, L., and Ford, I. J.: The microphysical pathway to contrail formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7893–7927, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023491, 2015.
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, M. T., Millar, R. J., Owen, B., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2020.117834, 2021.
Lewellen, D. C.: Persistent contrails and contrail cirrus. Part II: Full lifetime behavior, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4420–4438, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0317.1, 2014.
Lewellen, D. C., Meza, O., Huebsch, W. W., Lewellen, D. C., Meza, O., and Huebsch, W. W.: Persistent Contrails and Contrail Cirrus. Part I: Large-Eddy Simulations from Inception to Demise, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4399–4419, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0316.1, 2014.
Lovegren, J. A. and Hansman, R. J.: Estimation of Potential Aircraft Fuel Burn Reduction in Cruise Via Speed and Altitude Optimization Strategies, https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62196 (last access: 9 April 2024), 2011.
Low, J., Teoh, R., Ponsonby, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Shapiro, M., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Ground-based contrail observations: comparisons with reanalysis weather data and contrail model simulations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 37–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, 2025.
Mannstein, H., Brömser, A., and Bugliaro, L.: Ground-based observations for the validation of contrails and cirrus detection in satellite imagery, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 655–669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-655-2010, 2010.
Martin Frias, A., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Zopp, R., Soler, M., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Feasibility of contrail avoidance in a commercial flight planning system: an operational analysis, Environ. Res.-Infrastructure and Sustainability, 4, 015013, https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad310c, 2024.
Mayer, B. and Kylling, A.: Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations – description and examples of use, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1855–1877, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005, 2005.
Meerkötter, R., Schumann, U., Doelling, D. R., Minnis, P., Nakajima, T., and Tsushima, Y.: Radiative forcing by contrails, Ann. Geophys., 17, 1080–1094, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-999-1080-7, 1999.
Molloy, J., Teoh, R., Harty, S., Koudis, G., Schumann, U., Poll, I., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Design Principles for a Contrail-Minimizing Trial in the North Atlantic, Aerospace, 9, 375, https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE9070375, 2022.
Platt, J., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., McCloskey, K., Geraedts, S., Sankar, T., Stettler, M. E. J., Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Rohs, S., Brand, E., and Van Arsdale, C.: The effect of uncertainty in humidity and model parameters on the prediction of contrail energy forcing, Environ. Res. Commun., 6, 095015, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6ee5, 2024.
Poll, D. I. A.: 21st-Century civil aviation: Is it on course or is it over-confident and complacent? – thoughts on the conundrum of aviation and the environment, The Aeronautical Journal, 121, 115–140, https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.140, 2017.
Poll, D. I. A. and Schumann, U.: An estimation method for the fuel burn and other performance characteristics of civil transport aircraft in the cruise. Part 1 fundamental quantities and governing relations for a general atmosphere, The Aeronautical Journal, 125, 257–295, https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2020.62, 2020.
Poll, D. I. A. and Schumann, U.: An estimation method for the fuel burn and other performance characteristics of civil transport aircraft during cruise: part 2, determining the aircraft's characteristic parameters, The Aeronautical Journal, 125, 296–340, https://doi.org/10.1017/AER.2020.124, 2021.
Poll, D. I. A. and Schumann, U.: On the conditions for absolute minimum fuel burn for turbofan powered, civil transport aircraft and a simple model for wave drag, The Aeronautical Journal, 128, 1071–1103, https://doi.org/10.1017/AER.2024.10, 2024.
Ponater, M., Marquart, S., Sausen, R., and Schumann, U.: On contrail climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022580, 2005.
Ponater, M., Bickel, M., Bock, L., and Burkhardt, U.: Towards Determining the Contrail Cirrus Efficacy, Aerospace, 8, 42, https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE8020042, 2021.
Quante, G., Voß, S., Bullerdiek, N., Voigt, C., and Kaltschmitt, M.: Hydroprocessing of fossil fuel-based aviation kerosene – Technology options and climate impact mitigation potentials, Atmos. Environ. X, 22, 100259, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEAOA.2024.100259, 2024.
Rap, A., Forster, P. M., Haywood, J. M., Jones, A., and Boucher, O.: Estimating the climate impact of linear contrails using the UK Met Office climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L20703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045161, 2010.
Rennert, K., Errickson, F., Prest, B. C., Rennels, L., Newell, R. G., Pizer, W., Kingdon, C., Wingenroth, J., Cooke, R., Parthum, B., Smith, D., Cromar, K., Diaz, D., Moore, F. C., Müller, U. K., Plevin, R. J., Raftery, A. E., Ševčíková, H., Sheets, H., Stock, J. H., Tan, T., Watson, M., Wong, T. E., and Anthoff, D.: Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2, Nature, 610, 687–692, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9, 2022.
Rosenow, J., Hospodka, J., Lán, S., and Fricke, H.: Validation of a Contrail Life-Cycle Model in Central Europe, Sustainability, 15, 8669, https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15118669, 2023.
Rubnich, M. and Delaura, R.: An algorithm to identify robust convective weather avoidance polygons in en route airspace, 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference 2010, 13–15 September 2010, Fort Worth, Texas, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, ATIO 2010, 2, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-9164, 2010.
Santer, B. D., Sausen, R., Wigley, T. M. L., Boyle, J. S., AchutaRao, K., Doutriaux, C., Hansen, J. E., Meehl, G. A., Roeckner, E., Ruedy, R., Schmidt, G., and Taylor, K. E.: Behavior of tropopause height and atmospheric temperature in models, reanalyses, and observations: Decadal changes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, ACL 1-1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002258, 2003.
Sausen, R., Hofer, S. M., Gierens, K. M., Bugliaro Goggia, L., Ehrmanntraut, R., Sitova, I., Walczak, K., Burridge-Diesing, A., Bowman, M., and Miller, N.: Can we successfully avoid persistent contrails by small altitude adjustments of flights in the real world?, Meteorol. Z., 33, 83–98, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2023/1157, 2023.
Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts, Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/4, 1996.
Schumann, U.: A contrail cirrus prediction tool, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC-2), 69–74, https://elib.dlr.de/68002/ (last access: 9 March 2024), 2010.
Schumann, U.: A contrail cirrus prediction model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 543–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-543-2012, 2012.
Schumann, U. and Graf, K.: Aviation-induced cirrus and radiation changes at diurnal timescales, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2404–2421, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50184, 2013.
Schumann, U. and Heymsfield, A. J.: On the lifecycle of individual contrails and contrail cirrus, Meteorological Monographs, 58, 3.1–3.24, https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0005.1, 2017.
Schumann, U. and Mayer, B.: Sensitivity of surface temperature to radiative forcing by contrail cirrus in a radiative-mixing model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13833–13848, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13833-2017, 2017.
Schumann, U. and Wirth, M.: Optical depth of cirrus and embedded contrails from airborne Lidar and models, in: EGU General Assembly 2009, 5128, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009EGUGA..11.5128S/abstract (last access: 9 March 2024), 2009.
Schumann, U., Mayer, B., Hamann, U., and Graf, K.: Radiative heating in contrail cirrus, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 12 (EGU201), 1–2, European Geophysical Union General Assembly 2010, 2–7 May 2010, Wien, https://elib.dlr.de/67811/ (last access: 5 December 2022), 2010.
Schumann, U., Graf, K., and Mannstein, H.: Potential to reduce the climate impact of aviation by flight level changes, in: 3rd AIAA Atmospheric Space Environments Conference, 27–30 June 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3376, 2011.
Schumann, U., Graf, K., Mannstein, H., and Mayer, B.: Contrails: Visible aviation induced climate impact, in: Atmospheric Physics, Springer, 239–257, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_15, 2012a.
Schumann, U., Mayer, B., Graf, K., and Mannstein, H.: A parametric radiative forcing model for contrail cirrus, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 51, 1391–1406, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0242.1, 2012b.
Schumann, U., Hempel, R., Flentje, H., Garhammer, M., Graf, K., Kox, S., Lösslein, H., and Mayer, B.: Contrail study with ground-based cameras, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3597–3612, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3597-2013, 2013a.
Schumann, U., Jeßberger, P., and Voigt, C.: Contrail ice particles in aircraft wakes and their climatic importance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2867–2872, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50539, 2013b.
Schumann, U., Penner, J. E., Chen, Y., Zhou, C., and Graf, K.: Dehydration effects from contrails in a coupled contrail–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11179–11199, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11179-2015, 2015.
Schumann, U., Baumann, R., Baumgardner, D., Bedka, S. T., Duda, D. P., Freudenthaler, V., Gayet, J.-F., Heymsfield, A. J., Minnis, P., Quante, M., Raschke, E., Schlager, H., Vázquez-Navarro, M., Voigt, C., and Wang, Z.: Properties of individual contrails: a compilation of observations and some comparisons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 403–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-403-2017, 2017.
Schumann, U., Poll, I., Teoh, R., Koelle, R., Spinielli, E., Molloy, J., Koudis, G. S., Baumann, R., Bugliaro, L., Stettler, M., and Voigt, C.: Air traffic and contrail changes over Europe during COVID-19: a model study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7429–7450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7429-2021, 2021.
Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Teoh, R., and Dean, T.: pycontrails: Python library for modeling aviation climate impacts (v0.39.4), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7776686, 2023.
Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Teoh, R., Stettler, M., Dean, T., and Abbott, T.: pycontrails: Python library for modelling aviation climate impacts (v0.51.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11263606, 2024.
Sonabend-W, A., Elkin, C., Dean, T., Dudley, J., Ali, N., Blickstein, J., Brand, E., Broshears, B., Chen, S., Engberg, Z., Galyen, M., Geraedts, S., Goyal, N., Grenham, R., Hager, U., Hecker, D., Jany, M., McCloskey, K., Ng, J., Norris, B., Opel, F., Rothenberg, J., Sankar, T., Sanekommu, D., Sarna, A., Schütt, O., Shapiro, M., Soh, R., Van Arsdale, C., and Platt, J. C.: Feasibility test of per-flight contrail avoidance in commercial aviation, Commun. Eng., 3, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-024-00329-7, 2024.
Sonntag, D.: Advancements in the field of hygrometry, Meteorol. Z., 3, 51–66, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/3/1994/51, 1994.
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Majumdar, A., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Mitigating the Climate Forcing of Aircraft Contrails by Small-Scale Diversions and Technology Adoption, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2941–2950, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05608, 2020a.
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Beyond Contrail Avoidance: Efficacy of Flight Altitude Changes to Minimise Contrail Climate Forcing, Aerospace, 7, 121, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7090121, 2020b.
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Gryspeerdt, E., Shapiro, M., Molloy, J., Koudis, G., Voigt, C., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Aviation contrail climate effects in the North Atlantic from 2016 to 2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10919–10935, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10919-2022, 2022a.
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Voigt, C., Schripp, T., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Molloy, J., Koudis, G., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Targeted Use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel to Maximise Climate Benefits, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 17246–17255, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05781, 2022b.
Teoh, R., Engberg, Z., Schumann, U., Voigt, C., Shapiro, M., Rohs, S., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Global aviation contrail climate effects from 2019 to 2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6071–6093, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6071-2024, 2024a.
Teoh, R., Engberg, Z., Shapiro, M., Dray, L., and Stettler, M. E. J.: The high-resolution Global Aviation emissions Inventory based on ADS-B (GAIA) for 2019–2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 725–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-725-2024, 2024b.
Tobaruela, G.: A Framework to assess the ability of automation to deliver capacity targets in European airspace, PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, https://doi.org/10.25560/28150, 2015.
Turbli: Turbulence forecast for your flight, https://turbli.com/ (last access: 15 April 2024), 2024.
Unterstrasser, S.: Properties of young contrails – a parametrisation based on large-eddy simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2059–2082, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2059-2016, 2016.
Vázquez-Navarro, M., Mannstein, H., and Kox, S.: Contrail life cycle and properties from 1 year of MSG/SEVIRI rapid-scan images, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8739–8749, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8739-2015, 2015.
Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Jurkat, T., Schäuble, D., Schlager, H., Petzold, A., Gayet, J.-F., Krämer, M., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Schmale, J., Jessberger, P., Hamburger, T., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Gourbeyre, C., Meyer, J., Kübbeler, M., Frey, W., Kalesse, H., Butler, T., Lawrence, M. G., Holzäpfel, F., Arnold, F., Wendisch, M., Döpelheuer, A., Gottschaldt, K., Baumann, R., Zöger, M., Sölch, I., Rautenhaus, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: In-situ observations of young contrails – overview and selected results from the CONCERT campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9039–9056, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010, 2010.
Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Minikin, A., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A., Borrmann, S., Boettcher, M., Buchholz, B., Bugliaro, L., Costa, A., Curtius, J., Dollner, M., Dörnbrack, A., Dreiling, V., Ebert, V., Ehrlich, A., Fix, A., Forster, L., Frank, F., Fütterer, D., Giez, A., Graf, K., Grooß, J. U., Groß, S., Heimerl, K., Heinold, B., Hüneke, T., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Kenntner, M., Klingebiel, M., Klimach, T., Kohl, R., Krämer, M., Krisna, T. C., Luebke, A., Mayer, B., Mertes, S., Molleker, S., Petzold, A., Pfeilsticker, K., Port, M., Rapp, M., Reutter, P., Rolf, C., Rose, D., Sauer, D., Schäfler, A., Schlage, R., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Stock, P., Walser, A., Weigel, R., Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., Werner, F., Wernli, H., Wirth, M., Zahn, A., Ziereis, H., and Zöger, M.: ML-CIRRUS: The Airborne Experiment on Natural Cirrus and Contrail Cirrus with the High-Altitude Long-Range Research Aircraft HALO, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 271–288, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00213.1, 2017.
Wilhelm, L., Gierens, K., and Rohs, S.: Weather Variability Induced Uncertainty of Contrail Radiative Forcing, Aerospace, 8, 332, https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE8110332, 2021.
Wolf, K., Bellouin, N., and Boucher, O.: Long-term upper-troposphere climatology of potential contrail occurrence over the Paris area derived from radiosonde observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 287–309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-287-2023, 2023a.
Wolf, K., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Rohs, S., and Li, Y.: Correction of temperature and relative humidity biases in ERA5 by bivariate quantile mapping: Implications for contrail classification, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2356, 2023b.
Wolf, K., Bellouin, N., and Boucher, O.: Distribution and morphology of non-persistent contrail and persistent contrail formation areas in ERA5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5009–5024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5009-2024, 2024.
Yu, F., Kärcher, B., and Anderson, B. E.: Revisiting Contrail Ice Formation: Impact of Primary Soot Particle Sizes and Contribution of Volatile Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 17650–17660, https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.4C04340, 2024.
Short summary
Contrails forming in some atmospheric conditions may persist and become strongly warming cirrus, while in other conditions may be neutral or cooling. We develop a contrail forecast model to predict contrail climate forcing for any arbitrary point in space and time and explore integration into flight planning and air traffic management. This approach enables contrail interventions to target high-probability high-climate-impact regions and reduce unintended consequences of contrail management.
Contrails forming in some atmospheric conditions may persist and become strongly warming cirrus,...
