Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1141-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1141-2025
Development and technical paper
 | 
26 Feb 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 26 Feb 2025

Identifying lightning processes in ERA5 soundings with deep learning

Gregor Ehrensperger, Thorsten Simon, Georg J. Mayr, and Tobias Hell

Related authors

Detection and consequences of atmospheric deserts: insights from a case study
Fiona Fix, Georg Mayr, Achim Zeileis, Isabell Stucke, and Reto Stauffer
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1545–1560, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1545-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Robust weather-adaptive post-processing using model output statistics random forests
Thomas Muschinski, Georg J. Mayr, Achim Zeileis, and Thorsten Simon
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 503–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-503-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-503-2023, 2023
Short summary
Thunderstorm environments in Europe
Deborah Morgenstern, Isabell Stucke, Georg J. Mayr, Achim Zeileis, and Thorsten Simon
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 489–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-489-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-489-2023, 2023
Short summary
Predicting power ramps from joint distributions of future wind speeds
Thomas Muschinski, Moritz N. Lang, Georg J. Mayr, Jakob W. Messner, Achim Zeileis, and Thorsten Simon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2393–2405, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Differentiating lightning in winter and summer with characteristics of the wind field and mass field
Deborah Morgenstern, Isabell Stucke, Thorsten Simon, Georg J. Mayr, and Achim Zeileis
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 361–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-361-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-361-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
An enhanced emission module for the PALM model system 23.10 with application for PM10 emission from urban domestic heating
Edward C. Chan, Ilona J. Jäkel, Basit Khan, Martijn Schaap, Timothy M. Butler, Renate Forkel, and Sabine Banzhaf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1119–1139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of predicted ultrafine particle size distributions in Europe to different nucleation rate parameterizations using PMCAMx-UF v2.2
David Patoulias, Kalliopi Florou, and Spyros N. Pandis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1103–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1103-2025, 2025
Short summary
Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data
Tim Radke, Susanne Fuchs, Christian Wilms, Iuliia Polkova, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1017–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accurate space-based NOx emission estimates with the flux divergence approach require fine-scale model information on local oxidation chemistry and profile shapes
Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Enrico Dammers, Charlotte Bryan, and Folkert Boersma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring a high-level programming model for the NWP domain using ECMWF microphysics schemes
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.: Evaluation of Lightning Flash Rate Parameterizations for Use in a Global Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 15-1–ACH 15-21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066, 2002. a
Barnes, E. A., Toms, B., Hurrell, J. W., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Anderson, C., and Anderson, D.: Indicator Patterns of Forced Change Learned by an Artificial Neural Network, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002195, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002195, 2020. a
Becerra, M., Long, M., Schulz, W., and Thottappillil, R.: On the Estimation of the Lightning Incidence to Offshore Wind Farms, Electr. Pow. Syst. Res., 157, 211–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.12.008, 2018. a
Brisson, E., Blahak, U., Lucas-Picher, P., Purr, C., and Ahrens, B.: Contrasting Lightning Projection Using the Lightning Potential Index Adapted in a Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Model, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2037–2051, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05791-z, 2021. a
Brook, M., Nakano, M., Krehbiel, P., and Takeuti, T.: The electrical structure of the hokuriku winter thunderstorms, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 87, 1207–1215, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC02p01207, 1982. a
Download
Short summary
As lightning is a brief and localized event, it is not explicitly resolved in atmospheric models. Instead, expert-based auxiliary descriptions are used to assess it. This study explores how AI can improve our understanding of lightning without relying on traditional expert knowledge. We reveal that AI independently identified the key factors known to experts as essential for lightning in the Alps region. This shows how knowledge discovery could be sped up in areas with limited expert knowledge.
Share