Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
Model evaluation paper
 | 
05 Dec 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 05 Dec 2024

Evaluation of MITgcm-based ocean reanalyses for the Southern Ocean

Yoshihiro Nakayama, Alena Malyarenko, Hong Zhang, Ou Wang, Matthis Auger, Yafei Nie, Ian Fenty, Matthew Mazloff, Armin Köhl, and Dimitris Menemenlis

Viewed

Total article views: 3,550 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,494 976 80 3,550 138 71 124
  • HTML: 2,494
  • PDF: 976
  • XML: 80
  • Total: 3,550
  • Supplement: 138
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 124
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Apr 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Apr 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,550 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,430 with geography defined and 120 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Global- and basin-scale ocean reanalyses are becoming easily accessible. However, such ocean reanalyses are optimized for their entire model domains and their ability to simulate the Southern Ocean requires evaluation. We conduct intercomparison analyses of Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model (MITgcm)-based ocean reanalyses. They generally perform well for the open ocean, but open-ocean temporal variability and Antarctic continental shelves require improvements.
Read more
Share