Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University  Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0)

Zhu, Huajie; Wu, Mousong; Jiang, Fei; Vossbeck, Michael; Kaminski, Thomas; Xing, Xiuli; Wang, Jun; Ju, Weimin; Chen, Jing M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024

Articles | Volume 17, issue 16

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 17, issue 16

Model description paper

|

30 Aug 2024

Model description paper |

| 30 Aug 2024

Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0)

Huajie Zhu, Mousong Wu, Fei Jiang, Michael Vossbeck, Thomas Kaminski, Xiuli Xing, Jun Wang, Weimin Ju, and Jing M. Chen

Download

Final revised paper (published on 30 Aug 2024)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 27 Sep 2023)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

CEC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Oct 2023

Dear authors,
I am commenting on your manuscript regarding the "Code Availability" section. Right now, in the section to make available your code, you mention a GitHub repository. GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing. However, in the information submitted with your manuscript, you have included a Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/record/8288751) for the same code that you linked from GitHub. This is exactly the information that should be in the "Code Availability" section, instead of the link to GitHub.
Therefore, I leave here this comment, with the link to the Zenodo repository, so that it is available to all the community for any potential review or comment on your manuscript. And please, in any potentially reviewed or accepted version of your manuscript, remove the link to GitHub and instead include the link and DOi for the Zenodo repository.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CEC1
- CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Mousong Wu, 12 Oct 2023
  
  Thanks for pointing out this. We will only show the Zendo link in the further update of the mansucript and remove the Github link as suggested.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-CC1
- AC3: 'Reply on CEC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
  
  Dear Juan Antonio Añel,
  Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have proceeded with including only the Zendo link in the latest version of the manuscript and have removed the GitHub link as suggested.
  
  In the future, we will use the Zenodo (a repository suitable for long-term archival and publishing) link for any upcoming versions of the manuscript, instead of the GitHub link.
  If you have any further recommendations or requirements, please don't hesitate to let us know.
  Best regards,
  Huajie Zhu
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-AC3
RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023

Please refer to the Pdf file attached.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-RC1
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
  
  Dear reviewer #1,
  We have carefully reviewed your valuable comments and have provided detailed responses to each of them. Please refer to the attached document for further details.
  Warm regards,
  Huajie Zhu
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-AC1
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-1955', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Dec 2023

Please find my detailed comments in the attached pdf file.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-RC2
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Huajie Zhu, 15 Feb 2024
  
  Dear reviewer #2
  We have carefully reviewed your valuable comments and have provided detailed responses to each of them. Please refer to the attached document for further details.
  Warm regards,
  Huajie Zhu
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1955-AC2

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload

AR by Huajie Zhu on behalf of the Authors (20 Feb 2024) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

EF by Sarah Buchmann (21 Feb 2024) Supplement

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (21 Feb 2024) by Yilong Wang

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (08 Mar 2024)

RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (17 May 2024)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (19 May 2024) by Yilong Wang

AR by Huajie Zhu on behalf of the Authors (09 Jun 2024) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (12 Jun 2024) by Yilong Wang

AR by Huajie Zhu on behalf of the Authors (15 Jun 2024)

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval

AA by Huajie Zhu on behalf of the Authors (26 Aug 2024) Author's adjustment Manuscript

EA: Adjustments approved (26 Aug 2024) by Yilong Wang

Short summary

In this work, we developed the Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0). Data assimilation experiments were conducted to demonstrate the robustness and investigate the feasibility and applicability of NUCAS. The assimilation of ecosystem carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes improved the model performance in gross primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and sensible heat, showing that COS provides constraints on parameters relevant to carbon-, water-, and energy-related processes.