Articles | Volume 17, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
01 Aug 2024
Methods for assessment of models |  | 01 Aug 2024

Exploring the potential of history matching for land surface model calibration

Nina Raoult, Simon Beylat, James M. Salter, Frédéric Hourdin, Vladislav Bastrikov, Catherine Ottlé, and Philippe Peylin

Viewed

Total article views: 673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
462 175 36 673 44 21
  • HTML: 462
  • PDF: 175
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 673
  • BibTeX: 44
  • EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 755 with geography defined and -82 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Aug 2024
Download
Short summary
We use computer models to predict how the land surface will respond to climate change. However, these complex models do not always simulate what we observe in real life, limiting their effectiveness. To improve their accuracy, we use sophisticated statistical and computational techniques. We test a technique called history matching against more common approaches. This method adapts well to these models, helping us better understand how they work and therefore how to make them more realistic.