Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
22 May 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 22 May 2024

Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2

Sandro Vattioni, Andrea Stenke, Beiping Luo, Gabriel Chiodo, Timofei Sukhodolov, Elia Wunderlin, and Thomas Peter

Viewed

Total article views: 984 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
744 185 55 984 68 36 39
  • HTML: 744
  • PDF: 185
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 984
  • Supplement: 68
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 984 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 987 with geography defined and -3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We investigate the sensitivity of aerosol size distributions in the presence of strong SO2 injections for climate interventions or after volcanic eruptions to the call sequence and frequency of the routines for nucleation and condensation in sectional aerosol models with operator splitting. Using the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2, we show that the radiative and chemical outputs are sensitive to these settings at high H2SO4 supersaturations and how to obtain reliable results.