Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3783-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3783-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
13 May 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 13 May 2024

Balloon drift estimation and improved position estimates for radiosondes

Ulrich Voggenberger, Leopold Haimberger, Federico Ambrogi, and Paul Poli

Related authors

LARA: a Lagrangian Reanalysis based on ERA5 spanning from 1940 to 2023
Lucie Bakels, Michael Blaschek, Marina Dütsch, Andreas Plach, Vincent Lechner, Georg Brack, Leopold Haimberger, and Andreas Stohl
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-26,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-26, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Shift in cold-point tropopause trends derived from radiosonde, satellite, and reanalysis data
Mona Zolghadrshojaee, Susann Tegtmeier, Sean M. Davis, Robin Pilch Kedzierski, and Leopold Haimberger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-82,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-82, 2025
Short summary
StraitFlux – precise computations of water strait fluxes on various modeling grids
Susanna Winkelbauer, Michael Mayer, and Leopold Haimberger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4603–4620, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4603-2024, 2024
Short summary
A quantitative assessment of air–sea heat flux trends from ERA5 since 1950 in the North Atlantic basin
Johannes Mayer, Leopold Haimberger, and Michael Mayer
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1085–1105, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1085-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1085-2023, 2023
Short summary
Assessment of Indonesian Throughflow transports from ocean reanalyses with mooring-based observations
Magdalena Fritz, Michael Mayer, Leopold Haimberger, and Susanna Winkelbauer
Ocean Sci., 19, 1203–1223, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1203-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1203-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Improving winter condition simulations in SURFEX-TEB v9.0 with a multi-layer snow model and ice
Gabriel Colas, Valéry Masson, François Bouttier, Ludovic Bouilloud, Laura Pavan, and Virve Karsisto
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3453–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3453-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3453-2025, 2025
Short summary
UA-ICON with the NWP physics package (version ua-icon-2.1): mean state and variability of the middle atmosphere
Markus Kunze, Christoph Zülicke, Tarique A. Siddiqui, Claudia C. Stephan, Yosuke Yamazaki, Claudia Stolle, Sebastian Borchert, and Hauke Schmidt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3359–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3359-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3359-2025, 2025
Short summary
Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) 2.0: an improved research and stakeholder tool for monitoring total methane emissions with high resolution worldwide using TROPOMI satellite observations
Lucas A. Estrada, Daniel J. Varon, Melissa Sulprizio, Hannah Nesser, Zichong Chen, Nicholas Balasus, Sarah E. Hancock, Megan He, James D. East, Todd A. Mooring, Alexander Oort Alonso, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Ilse Aben, Sabour Baray, Kevin W. Bowman, John R. Worden, Felipe J. Cardoso-Saldaña, Emily Reidy, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3311–3330, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3311-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3311-2025, 2025
Short summary
HTAP3 Fires: towards a multi-model, multi-pollutant study of fire impacts
Cynthia H. Whaley, Tim Butler, Jose A. Adame, Rupal Ambulkar, Steve R. Arnold, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Benjamin Gaubert, Douglas S. Hamilton, Min Huang, Hayley Hung, Johannes W. Kaiser, Jacek W. Kaminski, Christoph Knote, Gerbrand Koren, Jean-Luc Kouassi, Meiyun Lin, Tianjia Liu, Jianmin Ma, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Elisa Bergas Masso, Jessica L. McCarty, Mariano Mertens, Mark Parrington, Helene Peiro, Pallavi Saxena, Saurabh Sonwani, Vanisa Surapipith, Damaris Y. T. Tan, Wenfu Tang, Veerachai Tanpipat, Kostas Tsigaridis, Christine Wiedinmyer, Oliver Wild, Yuanyu Xie, and Paquita Zuidema
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3265–3309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Using a data-driven statistical model to better evaluate surface turbulent heat fluxes in weather and climate numerical models: a demonstration study
Maurin Zouzoua, Sophie Bastin, Fabienne Lohou, Marie Lothon, Marjolaine Chiriaco, Mathilde Jome, Cécile Mallet, Laurent Barthes, and Guylaine Canut
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3211–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3211-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aberson, S. D., Sellwood, K. J., and Leighton, P. A.: Calculating Dropwindsonde Location and Time from TEMP-DROP Messages for Accurate Assimilation and Analysis, J. Atmos. Ocean. Techn., 34, 1673–1678, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-17-0023.1, 2017. 
Alexander, P. and de La Torre, A.: Uncertainties in the measurement of the atmospheric velocity due to balloon-gondola pendulum-like motions, Adv. Space Res., 47, 736–739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.020, 2011. 
Choi, Y., Ha, J., and Lim, G.: Investigation of the Effects of Considering Balloon Drift Information on Radiosonde Data Assimilation Using the Four-Dimensional Variational Method, Weather Forecast., 30, 809–826, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00161.1, 2015. 
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store: In situ atmospheric harmonized temperature, relative humidity and wind from 1978 onward from baseline radiosonde networks, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f101d0bf, 2021. 
Crutcher, H. L.: Distribution of radiosonde errors, NOAA Tech. Rep. Environmental Data and Information Service (EDIS), 32, U.S. Department Of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/30830/noaa_30830_DS1.pdf (last access: 7 May 2024), 1979. 
Download
Short summary
This paper presents a method for calculating balloon drift from historical radiosonde ascent data. The drift can reach distances of several hundred kilometres and is often neglected. Verification shows the beneficial impact of the more accurate balloon position on model assimilation. The method is not limited to radiosondes but would also work for dropsondes, ozonesondes, or any other in situ sonde carried by the wind in the pre-GNSS era, provided the necessary information is available.
Share