Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6127-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6127-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Model evaluation paper
 | 
01 Nov 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 01 Nov 2023

Evaluation of the CMCC global eddying ocean model for the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP2)

Doroteaciro Iovino, Pier Giuseppe Fogli, and Simona Masina

Viewed

Total article views: 5,128 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,841 2,168 119 5,128 156 233
  • HTML: 2,841
  • PDF: 2,168
  • XML: 119
  • Total: 5,128
  • BibTeX: 156
  • EndNote: 233
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,128 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,128 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This paper describes the model performance of three global ocean–sea ice configurations, from non-eddying (1°) to eddy-rich (1/16°) resolutions. Model simulations are obtained following the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP2) protocol. We compare key global climate variables across the three models and against observations, emphasizing the relative advantages and disadvantages of running forced ocean–sea ice models at higher resolution.
Read more
Share