Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-597-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
26 Jan 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 26 Jan 2023

Evaluation of a cloudy cold-air pool in the Columbia River basin in different versions of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model

Bianca Adler, James M. Wilczak, Jaymes Kenyon, Laura Bianco, Irina V. Djalalova, Joseph B. Olson, and David D. Turner

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Bianca Adler on behalf of the Authors (10 Dec 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Dec 2022) by Chiel van Heerwaarden
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (29 Dec 2022)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (01 Jan 2023) by Chiel van Heerwaarden
AR by Bianca Adler on behalf of the Authors (06 Jan 2023)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Rapid changes in wind speed make the integration of wind energy produced during persistent orographic cold-air pools difficult to integrate into the electrical grid. By evaluating three versions of NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model, we demonstrate how model developments targeted during the second Wind Forecast Improvement Project improve the forecast of a persistent cold-air pool event.