Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5931-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5931-2023
Model evaluation paper
 | 
20 Oct 2023
Model evaluation paper |  | 20 Oct 2023

Evaluation of vertically resolved longwave radiation in SPARTACUS-Urban 0.7.3 and the sensitivity to urban surface temperatures

Megan A. Stretton, William Morrison, Robin J. Hogan, and Sue Grimmond

Related authors

Variation in shortwave water vapour continuum and impact on clear-sky shortwave radiative feedback
Kaah P. Menang, Stefan A. Buehler, Lukas Kluft, Robin J. Hogan, and Florian E. Roemer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3051,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3051, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Radiative Closure Assessment of Retrieved Cloud and Aerosol Properties for the EarthCARE Mission: The ACMB-DF Product
Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Najda Villefranque, Zhipeng Qu, Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, Carlos Domenech, Shannon L. Mason, and Robin J. Hogan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1651,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1651, 2024
Short summary
Inclusion of the ECMWF ecRad radiation scheme (v1.5.0) in the MAR model (v3.14), regional evaluation for Belgium and assessment of surface shortwave spectral fluxes at Uccle observatory
Jean-François Grailet, Robin J. Hogan, Nicolas Ghilain, Xavier Fettweis, and Marilaure Grégoire
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1858,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1858, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating the representation of Arctic cirrus solar radiative effects in the Integrated Forecasting System with airborne measurements
Johannes Röttenbacher, André Ehrlich, Hanno Müller, Florian Ewald, Anna E. Luebke, Benjamin Kirbus, Robin J. Hogan, and Manfred Wendisch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8085–8104, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8085-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8085-2024, 2024
Short summary
How does perceived heat stress differ between urban forms and human vulnerability profiles? – case study Berlin
Nimra Iqbal, Marvin Ravan, Zina Mitraka, Joern Birkmann, Sue Grimmond, Denise Hertwig, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Giorgos Somarakis, and Angela Wendnagel-Beck
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1907,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1907, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Source-specific bias correction of US background and anthropogenic ozone modeled in CMAQ
T. Nash Skipper, Christian Hogrefe, Barron H. Henderson, Rohit Mathur, Kristen M. Foley, and Armistead G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8373–8397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observational operator for fair model evaluation with ground NO2 measurements
Li Fang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Ke Li, Ji Xia, Wei Han, Baojie Li, Hai Xiang Lin, Lei Zhu, Song Liu, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8267–8282, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024, 2024
Short summary
Valid time shifting ensemble Kalman filter (VTS-EnKF) for dust storm forecasting
Mijie Pang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Huiya Jiang, Wei Han, Batjargal Buyantogtokh, Ji Xia, Li Fang, Jiandong Li, Hai Xiang Lin, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8223–8242, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aida, M.: Urban albedo as a function of the urban structure – A model experiment, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 23, 405–413, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116269, 1982. 
Aida, M. and Gotoh, K.: Urban albedo as a function of the urban structure – A two-dimensional numerical simulation – Part II, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 23, 415–424, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116270, 1982. 
Antoniou, N., Montazeri, H., Neophytou, M., and Blocken, B.: CFD simulation of urban microclimate: Validation using high-resolution field measurements, Sci. Total Environ., 695, 133743, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.133743, 2019. 
Ao, X., Grimmond, C. S. B., Liu, D., Han, Z., Hu, P., Wang, Y., Zhen, X., and Tan, J.: Radiation fluxes in a business district of Shanghai, China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 55, 2451–2468, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0082.1, 2016. 
Arnfield, A. J.: An approach to the estimation of the surface radiative properties and radiation budgets of cities, Phys. Geogr., 3, 97–122, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1982.10642221, 1982. 
Download
Short summary
Cities' materials and forms impact radiative fluxes. We evaluate the SPARTACUS-Urban multi-layer approach to modelling longwave radiation, describing realistic 3D geometry statistically using the explicit DART (Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer) model. The temperature configurations used are derived from thermal camera observations. SPARTACUS-Urban accurately predicts longwave fluxes, with a low computational time (cf. DART), but has larger errors with sunlit/shaded surface temperatures.