Articles | Volume 16, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5561-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5561-2023
Development and technical paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
06 Oct 2023
Development and technical paper | Highlight paper |  | 06 Oct 2023

Emulating lateral gravity wave propagation in a global chemistry–climate model (EMAC v2.55.2) through horizontal flux redistribution

Roland Eichinger, Sebastian Rhode, Hella Garny, Peter Preusse, Petr Pisoft, Aleš Kuchař, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, and Bastian Kern

Viewed

Total article views: 1,373 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,071 242 60 1,373 87 46 36
  • HTML: 1,071
  • PDF: 242
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 1,373
  • Supplement: 87
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Apr 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,373 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,341 with geography defined and 32 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Jun 2024
Executive editor
Grave wave (GW) parameterisations currently used in state-of-the-art weather and climate models are based on a purely columnar approach, which does not allow for any horizontal propagation of GWs and has been identified as potential source of systematic biases in the simulation of middle atmospheric dynamics. The study by Eichinger and colleagues presents now a computationally efficient method to emulate the effects of lateral propagation of orographic GWs in climate models by horizontal momentum flux redistribution using redistribution maps derived from a GW ray-tracing model. The presented approach is an important step towards a better representation of orographic GWs in climate models, which might improve long-standing problems in atmospheric modelling.
Short summary
The columnar approach of gravity wave (GW) schemes results in dynamical model biases, but parallel decomposition makes horizontal GW propagation computationally unfeasible. In the global model EMAC, we approximate it by GW redistribution at one altitude using tailor-made redistribution maps generated with a ray tracer. More spread-out GW drag helps reconcile the model with observations and close the 60°S GW gap. Polar vortex dynamics are improved, enhancing climate model credibility.