Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
28 Apr 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 28 Apr 2023

Comparison of ozone formation attribution techniques in the northeastern United States

Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Barron H. Henderson, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Christian Hogrefe

Viewed

Total article views: 2,605 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,973 570 62 2,605 157 41 44
  • HTML: 1,973
  • PDF: 570
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 2,605
  • Supplement: 157
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,605 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,540 with geography defined and 65 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emission sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.