Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
Development and technical paper
 | 
28 Apr 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 28 Apr 2023

Comparison of ozone formation attribution techniques in the northeastern United States

Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Barron H. Henderson, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Christian Hogrefe

Viewed

Total article views: 4,316 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,100 1,111 105 4,316 319 121 165
  • HTML: 3,100
  • PDF: 1,111
  • XML: 105
  • Total: 4,316
  • Supplement: 319
  • BibTeX: 121
  • EndNote: 165
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,316 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,205 with geography defined and 111 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emission sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.
Read more
Share