Articles | Volume 16, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023
Model experiment description paper
 | 
06 Mar 2023
Model experiment description paper |  | 06 Mar 2023

An inconsistency in aviation emissions between CMIP5 and CMIP6 and the implications for short-lived species and their radiative forcing

Robin N. Thor, Mariano Mertens, Sigrun Matthes, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Sabine Brinkop, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, and Steven Smith

Viewed

Total article views: 1,805 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,324 421 60 1,805 44 42
  • HTML: 1,324
  • PDF: 421
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 1,805
  • BibTeX: 44
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,805 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,735 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We report on an inconsistency in the latitudinal distribution of aviation emissions between two versions of a data product which is widely used by researchers. From the available documentation, we do not expect such an inconsistency. We run a chemistry–climate model to compute the effect of the inconsistency in emissions on atmospheric chemistry and radiation and find that the radiative forcing associated with aviation ozone is 7.6 % higher when using the less recent version of the data.