Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1379-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
| 
28 Feb 2023
Model evaluation paper |
| 28 Feb 2023
| 28 Feb 2023
On the use of Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) spectrally resolved radiances to test the EC-Earth climate model (v3.3.3) in clear-sky conditions
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 28 Feb 2023)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 03 Aug 2022)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-479', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Aug 2022
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Stefano Della Fera, 26 Aug 2022
- CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Aug 2022
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Stefano Della Fera, 26 Aug 2022
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-479', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Sep 2022
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Stefano Della Fera, 09 Dec 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-479', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Nov 2022
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Stefano Della Fera, 09 Dec 2022
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Stefano Della Fera on behalf of the Authors (05 Jan 2023)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (09 Jan 2023) by Volker Grewe
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (28 Jan 2023)
ED: Publish as is (30 Jan 2023) by Volker Grewe
AR by Stefano Della Fera on behalf of the Authors (07 Feb 2023)
Dear authors,
I have to bring to your attention again the issue with the σ-IASI code previously raised by the Topical Editor. Unfortunately, I can not consider your excuse for not publishing it satisfactory, as it is a third-party model out of your control. Ultimately, you decided to use non-free software for your work, which goes against the principles of the scientific method and precludes the replicability and reproducibility of your study.
From your reply to the topical editor, I understand that you have discussed this with the authors of the model. Their reply does not seem too convincing. What prevents the authors of σ-IASI from publishing the code? It would be good to have a reply to this question.
However, what is more problematic is that the web server at the Università degli Studi della Basilicata is not a trustable repository for long-term archival, something necessary in scientific publication. Indeed, the web page of the model is not updated since 2010. If the email address that you provide to get access to σ-IASI becomes suddenly unresponsive, the accessibility to the code and, therefore, the replicability of your work would break. If the authors of σ-IASI do not want to publish the code, at minimum, if they want to use it for "scientific" purposes, they should store it in a suitable repository for scientific research (e.g. Zenodo) and issue a DOI for it, that you, for example, could cite as a user. This repository does not need to be accessible to anyone and, at the same time, would be trustable and citable. This is the bare minimum we need to ask you in this case.
Therefore, please, liaise with the σ-IASI authors to fix this situation, according to the exposed above, and reply to this comment with the new information (link and DOI) for the new repository. Also, modify the Code Availability Section of your manuscript accordingly in any potential reviewed version.
As a personal note, if the σ-IASI developers do not publish their code, I advise you to avoid using it in the future.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor