Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 859–882, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 859–882, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022
Model description paper
31 Jan 2022
Model description paper | 31 Jan 2022

MPR 1.0: a stand-alone multiscale parameter regionalization tool for improved parameter estimation of land surface models

Robert Schweppe et al.

Related authors

Uncertainty in water transit time estimation with StorAge Selection functions and tracer data interpolation
Arianna Borriero, Rohini Kumar, Tam V. Nguyen, Jan H. Fleckenstein, and Stefanie R. Lutz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-222,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-222, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Droughts can reduce the nitrogen retention capacity of catchments
Carolin Winter, Tam V. Nguyen, Andreas Musolff, Stefanie R. Lutz, Michael Rode, Rohini Kumar, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-431,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-431, 2022
Short summary
Developing a Parsimonious Canopy Model (PCM v1.0) to Predict Forest Gross Primary Productivity and Leaf Area Index
Bahar Bahrami, Anke Hildebrandt, Stephan Thober, Corinna Rebmann, Rico Fischer, Luis Samaniego, Oldrich Rakovec, and Rohini Kumar
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-87, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
GSTools v1.3: a toolbox for geostatistical modelling in Python
Sebastian Müller, Lennart Schüler, Alraune Zech, and Falk Heße
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3161–3182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022, 2022
Short summary
Water quality, discharge and catchment attributes for large-sample studies in Germany – QUADICA
Pia Ebeling, Rohini Kumar, Stefanie R. Lutz, Tam Nguyen, Fanny Sarrazin, Michael Weber, Olaf Büttner, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Musolff
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-6, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
FOCI-MOPS v1 – integration of marine biogeochemistry within the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI 1) Earth system model
Chia-Te Chien, Jonathan V. Durgadoo, Dana Ehlert, Ivy Frenger, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, Lavinia Patara, Sebastian Wahl, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5987–6024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessment of the Paris urban heat island in ERA5 and offline SURFEX-TEB (v8.1) simulations using the METEOSAT land surface temperature product
Miguel Nogueira, Alexandra Hurduc, Sofia Ermida, Daniela C. A. Lima, Pedro M. M. Soares, Frederico Johannsen, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5949–5965, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Earth system model CLIMBER-X v1.0 – Part 1: Climate model description and validation​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Matteo Willeit, Andrey Ganopolski, Alexander Robinson, and Neil R. Edwards
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5905–5948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022, 2022
Short summary
Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models
Takaya Uchida, Julien Le Sommer, Charles Stern, Ryan P. Abernathey, Chris Holdgraf, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Jonathan Gula, Guillaume Roullet, Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Dimitris Menemenlis, Clément Bricaud, Brian K. Arbic, Jay F. Shriver, Fangli Qiao, Bin Xiao, Arne Biastoch, René Schubert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, William K. Dewar, and Alan Wallcraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, 2022
Short summary
swNEMO_v4.0: an ocean model based on NEMO4 for the new-generation Sunway supercomputer
Yuejin Ye, Zhenya Song, Shengchang Zhou, Yao Liu, Qi Shu, Bingzhuo Wang, Weiguo Liu, Fangli Qiao, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5739–5756, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, S. V., Ford, R. W., Hambley, M., Hobson, J. M., Kavčič, I., Maynard, C. M., Melvin, T., Müller, E. H., Mullerworth, S., Porter, A. R., Rezny, M., Shipway, B. J., and Wong, R.: LFRic: Meeting the challenges of scalability and performance portability in Weather and Climate models, J. Parallel Distr. Com., 132, 383–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.02.007, 2019. a
Andre, B., Kluzek, E., and Sacks, W.: CLM Community Land Model, available at: https://escomp.github.io/ctsm-docs/versions/release-clm5.0/html/index.html (last access: 16 January 2022), 2020. a, b
Arheimer, B., Pimentel, R., Isberg, K., Crochemore, L., Andersson, J. C. M., Hasan, A., and Pineda, L.: Global catchment modelling using World-Wide HYPE (WWH), open data, and stepwise parameter estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 535–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-535-2020, 2020. a
Balsamo, G., Beljaars, A., Scipal, K., Viterbo, P., van den Hurk, B., Hirschi, M., and Betts, A. K.: A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model: Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the Integrated Forecast System, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 623–643, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1, 2009. a, b
Beck, H. E., Dijk, A. I. J. M. v., Roo, A. d., Miralles, D. G., McVicar, T. R., Schellekens, J., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3599–3622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018247, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
The recently released multiscale parameter regionalization (MPR) tool enables environmental modelers to efficiently use extensive datasets for model setups. It flexibly ingests the datasets using user-defined data–parameter relationships and rescales parameter fields to given model resolutions. Modern land surface models especially benefit from MPR through increased transparency and flexibility in modeling decisions. Thus, MPR empowers more sound and robust simulations of the Earth system.