School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Kelong Chen
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Chongyi E
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Xiaoni You
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Dongcai He
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Liangbai Hu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Baokang Liu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Runke Wang
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Yaya Shi
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Chengxiu Li
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Fumei Liu
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,419 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,563
1,733
123
6,419
391
115
179
HTML: 4,563
PDF: 1,733
XML: 123
Total: 6,419
Supplement: 391
BibTeX: 115
EndNote: 179
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 5,082 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,679
1,305
98
5,082
255
100
165
HTML: 3,679
PDF: 1,305
XML: 98
Total: 5,082
Supplement: 255
BibTeX: 100
EndNote: 165
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Total article views: 1,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
884
428
25
1,337
136
15
14
HTML: 884
PDF: 428
XML: 25
Total: 1,337
Supplement: 136
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,419 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,212 with geography defined
and 207 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,082 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,964 with geography defined
and 118 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,248 with geography defined
and 89 with unknown origin.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as...
