School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Kelong Chen
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Chongyi E
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Xiaoni You
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Dongcai He
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Liangbai Hu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Baokang Liu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Runke Wang
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Yaya Shi
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Chengxiu Li
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Fumei Liu
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,955 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,880
1,937
138
6,955
412
127
197
HTML: 4,880
PDF: 1,937
XML: 138
Total: 6,955
Supplement: 412
BibTeX: 127
EndNote: 197
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 5,564 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,946
1,505
113
5,564
267
111
182
HTML: 3,946
PDF: 1,505
XML: 113
Total: 5,564
Supplement: 267
BibTeX: 111
EndNote: 182
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Total article views: 1,391 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
934
432
25
1,391
145
16
15
HTML: 934
PDF: 432
XML: 25
Total: 1,391
Supplement: 145
BibTeX: 16
EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,955 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,727 with geography defined
and 228 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,564 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,427 with geography defined
and 137 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,391 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,300 with geography defined
and 91 with unknown origin.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as...
