School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Kelong Chen
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Chongyi E
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Xiaoni You
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Dongcai He
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Liangbai Hu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Baokang Liu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Runke Wang
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Yaya Shi
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Chengxiu Li
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Fumei Liu
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,039 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,341
1,584
114
6,039
373
107
173
HTML: 4,341
PDF: 1,584
XML: 114
Total: 6,039
Supplement: 373
BibTeX: 107
EndNote: 173
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 4,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,474
1,174
90
4,738
246
93
160
HTML: 3,474
PDF: 1,174
XML: 90
Total: 4,738
Supplement: 246
BibTeX: 93
EndNote: 160
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Total article views: 1,301 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
867
410
24
1,301
127
14
13
HTML: 867
PDF: 410
XML: 24
Total: 1,301
Supplement: 127
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,039 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,830 with geography defined
and 209 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,617 with geography defined
and 121 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,301 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,213 with geography defined
and 88 with unknown origin.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as...
