School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Kelong Chen
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Chongyi E
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Xiaoni You
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Dongcai He
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Liangbai Hu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Baokang Liu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Runke Wang
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Yaya Shi
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Chengxiu Li
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Fumei Liu
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,578 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,667
1,783
128
6,578
399
119
187
HTML: 4,667
PDF: 1,783
XML: 128
Total: 6,578
Supplement: 399
BibTeX: 119
EndNote: 187
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 5,222 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,765
1,354
103
5,222
262
103
172
HTML: 3,765
PDF: 1,354
XML: 103
Total: 5,222
Supplement: 262
BibTeX: 103
EndNote: 172
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Total article views: 1,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
902
429
25
1,356
137
16
15
HTML: 902
PDF: 429
XML: 25
Total: 1,356
Supplement: 137
BibTeX: 16
EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,578 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,360 with geography defined
and 218 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,222 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,095 with geography defined
and 127 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,265 with geography defined
and 91 with unknown origin.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as...
