School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Kelong Chen
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Chongyi E
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining, 810008, China
Xiaoni You
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Dongcai He
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Liangbai Hu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Baokang Liu
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Runke Wang
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Yaya Shi
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Chengxiu Li
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal
University, Tianshui 741001, China
Fumei Liu
MOE Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Land Surface Processes and
Ecological Conservation/Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Physical
Geography and Environmental Processes, Xining 810008, China
Viewed
Total article views: 5,890 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,248
1,528
114
5,890
370
107
171
HTML: 4,248
PDF: 1,528
XML: 114
Total: 5,890
Supplement: 370
BibTeX: 107
EndNote: 171
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 4,609 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,388
1,131
90
4,609
245
93
158
HTML: 3,388
PDF: 1,131
XML: 90
Total: 4,609
Supplement: 245
BibTeX: 93
EndNote: 158
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Sep 2022)
Total article views: 1,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
860
397
24
1,281
125
14
13
HTML: 860
PDF: 397
XML: 24
Total: 1,281
Supplement: 125
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Mar 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,890 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,684 with geography defined
and 206 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,609 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,491 with geography defined
and 118 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,193 with geography defined
and 88 with unknown origin.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as meteorology, soil, and remote sensing (RS) has notable disadvantages. We drove the CASA using RS data and conducted a case study of the Qinghai Lake basin alpine grassland. The simulated result is similar to published and measured net primary productivity (NPP). It may provide a reference for simulating vegetation NPP to satisfy the requirements of accounting carbon stocks and other applications.
The traditional Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by multisource data such as...
