Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
06 Apr 2022
Development and technical paper |
| 06 Apr 2022
| 06 Apr 2022
Coupling a weather model directly to GNSS orbit determination – case studies with OpenIFS
Angel Navarro Trastoy
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Sebastian Strasser
Institute of Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
Lauri Tuppi
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Maksym Vasiuta
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Markku Poutanen
Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland
Torsten Mayer-Gürr
Institute of Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
Heikki Järvinen
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
Maksym Vasiuta, Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sanam Motlaghzadeh, Lauri Tuppi, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5015–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Propagation of electromagnetic signals in Earth's neutral atmosphere inflicts errors in space geodetic observations. To model these errors accurately, it is necessary to use a signal tracing algorithm which is informed of the state of the atmosphere. We developed such an algorithm and tested it by processing Global Navigation Satellite System network observations. Our algorithm's main advantage is lossless utilization of atmospheric information provided by numerical weather prediction models.
Maksym Vasiuta, Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sanam Motlaghzadeh, Lauri Tuppi, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5015–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5015-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Propagation of electromagnetic signals in Earth's neutral atmosphere inflicts errors in space geodetic observations. To model these errors accurately, it is necessary to use a signal tracing algorithm which is informed of the state of the atmosphere. We developed such an algorithm and tested it by processing Global Navigation Satellite System network observations. Our algorithm's main advantage is lossless utilization of atmospheric information provided by numerical weather prediction models.
Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, Jenni Kontkanen, Irina Sandu, Mario Acosta, Mohammed Hussam Al Turjmam, Ivan Alsina-Ferrer, Miguel Andrés-Martínez, Leo Arriola, Marvin Axness, Marc Batlle Martín, Peter Bauer, Tobias Becker, Daniel Beltrán, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Pierre-Antoine Bretonnière, Sebastien Cabaniols, Silvia Caprioli, Miguel Castrillo, Aparna Chandrasekar, Suvarchal Cheedela, Victor Correal, Emanuele Danovaro, Paolo Davini, Jussi Enkovaara, Claudia Frauen, Barbara Früh, Aina Gaya Àvila, Paolo Ghinassi, Rohit Ghosh, Supriyo Ghosh, Iker González, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Ioan Hadade, Christopher Haine, Carl Hartick, Utz-Uwe Haus, Shane Hearne, Heikki Järvinen, Bernat Jiménez, Amal John, Marlin Juchem, Thomas Jung, Jessica Kegel, Matthias Kelbling, Kai Keller, Bruno Kinoshita, Theresa Kiszler, Daniel Klocke, Lukas Kluft, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Joonas Kolstela, Luis Kornblueh, Sergey Kosukhin, Aleksander Lacima-Nadolnik, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, Jonni Lehtiranta, Tuomas Lunttila, Anna Luoma, Pekka Manninen, Alexey Medvedev, Sebastian Milinski, Ali Omar Abdelazim Mohammed, Sebastian Müller, Devaraju Naryanappa, Natalia Nazarova, Sami Niemelä, Bimochan Niraula, Henrik Nortamo, Aleksi Nummelin, Matteo Nurisso, Pablo Ortega, Stella Paronuzzi, Xabier Pedruzo Bagazgoitia, Charles Pelletier, Carlos Peña, Suraj Polade, Himansu Pradhan, Rommel Quintanilla, Tiago Quintino, Thomas Rackow, Jouni Räisänen, Maqsood Mubarak Rajput, René Redler, Balthasar Reuter, Nuno Rocha Monteiro, Francesc Roura-Adserias, Silva Ruppert, Susan Sayed, Reiner Schnur, Tanvi Sharma, Dmitry Sidorenko, Outi Sievi-Korte, Albert Soret, Christian Steger, Bjorn Stevens, Jan Streffing, Jaleena Sunny, Luiggi Tenorio, Stephan Thober, Ulf Tigerstedt, Oriol Tinto, Juha Tonttila, Heikki Tuomenvirta, Lauri Tuppi, Ginka Van Thielen, Emanuele Vitali, Jost von Hardenberg, Ingo Wagner, Nils Wedi, Jan Wehner, Sven Willner, Xavier Yepes-Arbós, Florian Ziemen, and Janos Zimmermann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2198, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The Climate Change Adaptation Digital Twin (Climate DT) pioneers the operationalisation of climate projections. The system produces global simulations with local granularity for adaptation decision-making. Applications are embedded to generate tailored indicators. A unified workflow orchestrates all components in several supercomputers. Data management ensures consistency and streaming enables real-time use. It is a complementary innovation to initiatives like CMIP, CORDEX, and climate services.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-509, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-509, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The nextGEMS project developed two Earth system models that resolve processes of the order of 10 km, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS performed simulations with coupled ocean, land, and atmosphere over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Pirkka Ollinaho, Glenn D. Carver, Simon T. K. Lang, Lauri Tuppi, Madeleine Ekblom, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2143–2160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
OpenEnsemble 1.0 is a novel dataset that aims to open ensemble or probabilistic weather forecasting research up to the academic community. The dataset contains atmospheric states that are required for running model forecasts of atmospheric evolution. Our capacity to observe the atmosphere is limited; thus, a single reconstruction of the atmospheric state contains some errors. Our dataset provides sets of 50 slightly different atmospheric states so that these errors can be taken into account.
Andreas Kvas, Jan Martin Brockmann, Sandro Krauss, Till Schubert, Thomas Gruber, Ulrich Meyer, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Wolf-Dieter Schuh, Adrian Jäggi, and Roland Pail
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 99–118, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-99-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-99-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Earth's gravity field provides invaluable insights into the state and changing nature of our planet. GOCO06s combines over 1 billion measurements from 19 satellites to produce a global gravity field model. The combination of different observation principles allows us to exploit the strengths of each satellite mission and provide a high-quality data set for Earth and climate sciences.
Martin Lasser, Ulrich Meyer, Adrian Jäggi, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Andreas Kvas, Karl Hans Neumayer, Christoph Dahle, Frank Flechtner, Jean-Michel Lemoine, Igor Koch, Matthias Weigelt, and Jakob Flury
Adv. Geosci., 55, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-55-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-55-1-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Correctly determining the orbit of Earth-orbiting satellites requires to account multiple background effects which appear in the system Earth. Usually, these effects are introduced by various complex force models, which are not always easy to handle. We publish and validate a data set of commonly used models to make it easier to track down potential issues when applying such background forces in orbit and gravity field determination.
Lauri Tuppi, Pirkka Ollinaho, Madeleine Ekblom, Vladimir Shemyakin, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5799–5812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents general guidelines on how to utilise computer algorithms efficiently in order to tune weather models so that they would produce better forecasts. The main conclusions are that the computer algorithms work most efficiently with a suitable cost function, certain forecast length and ensemble size. We expect that our results will facilitate the use of algorithmic methods in the tuning of weather models.
Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, and Heikki J. Järvinen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we investigate the role of the tropospheric forcing in the occurrence of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) that took place in February 2018, its predictability and teleconnection with the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by analysing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble forecast. The purpose of the paper is to present the results of the analysis of the atmospheric circulation before and during the SSW and clarify the driving mechanisms.
Janne Lampilahti, Hanna Elina Manninen, Katri Leino, Riikka Väänänen, Antti Manninen, Stephany Buenrostro Mazon, Tuomo Nieminen, Matti Leskinen, Joonas Enroth, Marja Bister, Sergej Zilitinkevich, Juha Kangasluoma, Heikki Järvinen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Tuukka Petäjä, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11841–11854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11841-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, by using co-located airborne and ground-based measurements, we show that counter-rotating horizontal circulations in the planetary boundary layer (roll vortices) frequently enhance regional new particle formation or induce localized bursts of new particle formation. These observations can be explained by the ability of the rolls to efficiently lift low-volatile vapors emitted from the surface to the top of the boundary layer where new particle formation is more favorable.
Cited articles
Arnold, D., Meindl, M., Beutler, G., Dach, R., Schaer, S., Lutz, S., Prange, L., Sośnica, K., Mervart, L., and Jäggi, A.: CODE's new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination, J. Geodesy, 89, 775–791, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0814-4, 2015. a
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956, 2015. a
Bevis, M., Businger, S., Herring, T., Rocken, C., Anthes, R., and Ware, R.: GPS Meteorology: Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapour Using the Global Positioning System, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 15787–15801, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01517, 1992. a
Böhm, J., Niell, A., Tregoning, P., and Schuh, H.: Global Mapping Function (GMF): A new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L07304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025546, 2006. a
Chen, G. and Herring, T. A.: Effects of atmospheric azimuthal asymmetry on the analysis of space geodetic data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 20489–20502, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB01739, 1997. a
CSC: CSC user guide, https://docs.csc.fi/computing/available-systems/ (last access: February 2021), 2021. a
Eresmaa, R., Järvinen, H., Niemelä, S., and Salonen, K.: Asymmetricity of ground-based GPS slant delay data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3143–3151, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3143-2007, 2007. a
Eresmaa, R., Healy, S., Järvinen, H., and Salonen, K.: Implementation of a ray-tracing operator for ground-based GPS Slant Delay observation modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D11114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009256, 2008a. a, b, c
Eresmaa, R., Järvinen, H., Nordman, M., Poutanen, M., and Luntama, J.-P.: Parameterization of tropospheric delay correction for mobile GNSS positioning: a case study of a cold front passage, Meteorol. Appl., 15, 447–454, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.86, 2008b. a
Eresmaa, R., Healy, S., and Tuppi, L.: Least travel time (LTT) operator, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4834412, 2021. a
Eriksson, D., MacMillan, D., and Gipson, J.: Tropospheric delay ray tracing applied in VLBI analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 9156–9170, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011552, 2014. a
Guerova, G., Jones, J., Douša, J., Dick, G., de Haan, S., Pottiaux, E., Bock, O., Pacione, R., Elgered, G., Vedel, H., and Bender, M.: Review of the state of the art and future prospects of the ground-based GNSS meteorology in Europe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5385–5406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5385-2016, 2016. a
Hauschild, A.: Basic Observation Equations, in: Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by: Teunissen, P. J. and Montenbruck, O., Springer Handbooks, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 561–582, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42928-1_19, 2017. a
Herring, T. A.: Modeling atmospheric delays in the analysis of space geodetic data, in: Proceedings of Refraction of Transatmospheric Signals in Geodesy, edited by: DeMunck, J. C. and Spoelstra, T. A. T., vol. 36 of Netherlands Geodetic Commission Series, The Hague, Netherlands, 57–164, 1992. a
Hobiger, T., Ichikawa, R., Takasu, T., Koyama, Y., and Kondo, T: Ray-traced troposphere slant delays for precise point positioning, Earth Planets Space, 60, e1–e4, https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352809, 2008. a
Hugentobler, U. and Montenbruck, O.: Satellite Orbits and Attitude, in: Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by: Teunissen, P. J. and Montenbruck, O., Springer Handbooks, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 59–90, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42928-1_3, 2017. a
Johnston, G., Riddell, A., and Hausler, G.: The International GNSS Service, in: Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by: Teunissen, P. J. and Montenbruck, O., Springer Handbooks, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 967–982, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42928-1_33, 2017.
a
Landskron, D. and Böhm, J.: VMF3/GPT3:refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping functions, J. Geodesy, 92, 349–360, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1066-2, 2018. a, b
Mayer-Gürr, T., Behzadpour, S., Eicker, A., Ellmer, M., Koch,
B., Krauss, S., Pock, C., Rieser, D., Strasser, S., Suesser-Rechberger, B., Zehentner, N., and Kvas, A.: GROOPS: A software toolkit for gravity field recovery and GNSS processing, Comput. Geosci., 155, 104864,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104864, 2021a. a, b
Mayer-Gürr, T., Behzadpour, S., Eicker, A., Ellmer, M., Koch, B., Krauss, S., Pock, C., Rieser, D., Strasser, S., Süsser-Rechberger, B., Zehentner, N., and Kvas, A.: GROOPS: A software toolkit for gravity field recovery and GNSS processing, https://github.com/groops-devs/groops (last access: March 2021), GitHub [code], 2021b. a
Nordman, M., Eresmaa, R., Poutanen, M., Järvinen, H., Koivula, H., and Luntama, J.-P.: Using numerical weather prediction model derived tropospheric slant delays in GPS processing: a case study, Geophysica, 43, 49–57, 2007. a
Nordman, M., Eresmaa, R., Boehm, J., Poutanen, M., Koivula, H., and Järvinen, H.: Effect of troposphere slant delays on regional double difference GPS processing, Earth Planets Space, 61, 845–852, 2009. a
Ollinaho, P., Carver, G. D., Lang, S. T. K., Tuppi, L., Ekblom, M., and Järvinen, H.: Ensemble prediction using a new dataset of ECMWF initial states – OpenEnsemble 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2143–2160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021, 2021. a, b
Petit, G. and Luzum, B. (Eds.): IERS Conventions (2010), IERS Technical Note 36, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/TechnicalNotes/tn36.html (last access: February 2021), 2010. a
Rocken, C., Sokolovskiy, S., Johnson, J. M., and Hunt, D.: Improved mapping of tropospheric delays, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 1205–1213, 2001. a
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding, Theory and Practice, 2, 256 pp., https://doi.org/10.1142/3171, 2000. a, b, c
Schönemann, E.: Analysis of GNSS raw observations in PPP solutions, Schriftenreihe der Fachrichtung Geodäsie, 42, https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/3843/ (last access: February 2021), 2014. a
Schönemann, E., Becker, M., and Springer, T.: A new Approach for GNSS Analysis in a Multi-GNSS and Multi-Signal Environment, Journal of Geodetic Science, 1, 204–214, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0023-2, 2011. a
Strasser, S., Mayer-Gürr, T., and Zehentner, N.: Processing of GNSS constellations and ground station networks using the raw observation approach, J. Geodesy, 93, 1045–1057, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1223-2, 2019. a, b, c
Zus, F., Dick, G., Dousa, J., Heise, S., and Wickert, J.: The rapid and precise computation of GPS slant total delays and mapping factors utilizing a numerical weather model, Radio Sci., 49, 207–216, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RS005280, 2014. a, b
Short summary
Production of satellite products relies on information from different centers. By coupling a weather model and an orbit determination solver we eliminate the dependence on one of the centers. The coupling has proven to be possible in the first stage, where no formatting has been applied to any of the models involved. This opens a window for further development and improvement to a coupling that has proven to be as good as the predecessor model.
Production of satellite products relies on information from different centers. By coupling a...
