Articles | Volume 15, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2063–2084, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2063-2022
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2063–2084, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2063-2022
Model description paper
10 Mar 2022
Model description paper | 10 Mar 2022

The linear feedback precipitation model (LFPM 1.0) – a simple and efficient model for orographic precipitation in the context of landform evolution modeling

Stefan Hergarten and Jörg Robl

Related authors

Self-organization of channels and hillslopes in models of fluvial landform evolution
Stefan Hergarten and Alexa Pietrek
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-605,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-605, 2022
Short summary
Theoretical and numerical considerations of rivers in a tectonically inactive foreland
Stefan Hergarten
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 671–686, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-671-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modelling large‐scale landform‐evolution with a stream‐power law for glacial erosion (OpenLEM v37): Benchmarking experiments against a more process-based description of ice flow (iSOSIA v3.4.3)
Moritz Liebl, Jörg Robl, Stefan Hergarten, David Lundbek Egholm, and Kurt Stüwe
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-352,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-352, 2022
Short summary
Modeling glacial and fluvial landform evolution at large scales using a stream-power approach
Stefan Hergarten
Earth Surf. Dynam., 9, 937–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-937-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-937-2021, 2021
Short summary
Controls on the formation and size of potential landslide dams and dammed lakes in the Austrian Alps
Anne-Laure Argentin, Jörg Robl, Günther Prasicek, Stefan Hergarten, Daniel Hölbling, Lorena Abad, and Zahra Dabiri
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1615–1637, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1615-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1615-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
FOCI-MOPS v1 – integration of marine biogeochemistry within the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI 1) Earth system model
Chia-Te Chien, Jonathan V. Durgadoo, Dana Ehlert, Ivy Frenger, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, Lavinia Patara, Sebastian Wahl, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5987–6024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessment of the Paris urban heat island in ERA5 and offline SURFEX-TEB (v8.1) simulations using the METEOSAT land surface temperature product
Miguel Nogueira, Alexandra Hurduc, Sofia Ermida, Daniela C. A. Lima, Pedro M. M. Soares, Frederico Johannsen, and Emanuel Dutra
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5949–5965, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5949-2022, 2022
Short summary
The Earth system model CLIMBER-X v1.0 – Part 1: Climate model description and validation​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Matteo Willeit, Andrey Ganopolski, Alexander Robinson, and Neil R. Edwards
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5905–5948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022, 2022
Short summary
Cloud-based framework for inter-comparing submesoscale-permitting realistic ocean models
Takaya Uchida, Julien Le Sommer, Charles Stern, Ryan P. Abernathey, Chris Holdgraf, Aurélie Albert, Laurent Brodeau, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Jonathan Gula, Guillaume Roullet, Nikolay Koldunov, Sergey Danilov, Qiang Wang, Dimitris Menemenlis, Clément Bricaud, Brian K. Arbic, Jay F. Shriver, Fangli Qiao, Bin Xiao, Arne Biastoch, René Schubert, Baylor Fox-Kemper, William K. Dewar, and Alan Wallcraft
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5829–5856, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5829-2022, 2022
Short summary
swNEMO_v4.0: an ocean model based on NEMO4 for the new-generation Sunway supercomputer
Yuejin Ye, Zhenya Song, Shengchang Zhou, Yao Liu, Qi Shu, Bingzhuo Wang, Weiguo Liu, Fangli Qiao, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5739–5756, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5739-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anders, A. M., Roe, G. H., Montgomery, D. R., and Hallet, B.: Influence of precipitation phase on the form of mountain ranges, Geology, 36, 479–482, https://doi.org/10.1130/G24821A.1, 2008. a, b
Barstad, I. and Schüller, F.: An extension of Smith's linear theory of orographic precipitation: introduction of vertical layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2695–2709, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-10-05016.1, 2011. a
Barstad, I. and Smith, R. B.: Evaluation of an orographic precipitation model, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 85–99, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-404.1, 2005. a
Bonnet, S.: Shrinking and splitting of drainage basins in orogenic landscapes from the migration of the main drainage divide, Nat. Geosci., 2, 766–771, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo666, 2009. a
Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Toward a complete Himalayan hydrological budget: Spatiotemporal distribution of snowmelt and rainfall and their impact on river discharge, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F03019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001426, 2010. a, b
Download
Short summary
The influence of climate on landform evolution has attracted great interest over the past decades. This paper presents a simple model for simulating the influence of topography on precipitation and the decrease in precipitation over large continental areas. The approach can be included in numerical models of large-scale landform evolution and causes only a moderate increase in the numerical complexity. It opens a door to investigating feedbacks between climate and landform evolution.